Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rspce | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
rspc.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspce | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2899 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | nfv 1920 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 | |
3 | rspc.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfan 1905 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) |
5 | eleq1 2820 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
6 | rspc.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | anbi12d 634 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) |
8 | 1, 4, 7 | spcegf 3494 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
9 | 8 | anabsi5 669 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) |
10 | df-rex 3059 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
11 | 9, 10 | sylibr 237 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1542 ∃wex 1786 Ⅎwnf 1790 ∈ wcel 2113 ∃wrex 3054 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1916 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2019 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2144 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2710 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 847 df-tru 1545 df-ex 1787 df-nf 1791 df-sb 2074 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2881 df-rex 3059 df-v 3399 |
This theorem is referenced by: rspcevOLD 3525 reuop 6119 ac6c4 9974 infcvgaux1i 15298 iunmbl2 24302 gsumpart 30884 esumcvg 31616 ptrecube 35389 poimirlem24 35413 sdclem1 35513 uzwo4 42123 eliuniincex 42181 elrnmpt1sf 42249 iuneqfzuzlem 42395 uzublem 42492 uzub 42493 limsupubuzlem 42779 sge0gerp 43459 smflim 43835 reupr 44492 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |