Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rspce | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
rspc.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspce | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2908 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | nfv 1920 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 | |
3 | rspc.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfan 1905 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) |
5 | eleq1 2827 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
6 | rspc.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | anbi12d 630 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) |
8 | 1, 4, 7 | spcegf 3529 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
9 | 8 | anabsi5 665 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) |
10 | df-rex 3071 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
11 | 9, 10 | sylibr 233 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∃wex 1785 Ⅎwnf 1789 ∈ wcel 2109 ∃wrex 3066 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1801 ax-4 1815 ax-5 1916 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2014 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2140 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2174 ax-ext 2710 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-tru 1544 df-ex 1786 df-nf 1790 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2817 df-nfc 2890 df-rex 3071 df-v 3432 |
This theorem is referenced by: rspcevOLD 3561 reuop 6193 ac6c4 10221 infcvgaux1i 15550 iunmbl2 24702 gsumpart 31294 esumcvg 32033 ptrecube 35756 poimirlem24 35780 sdclem1 35880 uzwo4 42554 eliuniincex 42612 elrnmpt1sf 42680 iuneqfzuzlem 42827 uzublem 42924 uzub 42925 limsupubuzlem 43207 sge0gerp 43887 smflim 44263 reupr 44926 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |