Theorem unabw 4266

Description: Union of two class abstractions. Version of unab 4267 using implicit substitution, which does not require ax-8 2151, ax-10 2182, ax-12 2219. (Contributed by GG, 15-Oct-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
unabw.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
unabw.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unabw	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜃,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem unabw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-un 3916	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})}
2		df-clab 2748	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		unabw.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	sbievw 2134	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
5	2, 4	bitri 278	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒)
6		df-clab 2748	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
7		unabw.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
8	7	sbievw 2134	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)
9	6, 8	bitri 278	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜃)
10	5, 9	orbi12i 927	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))
11	10	abbii 2836	. 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)}
12	1, 11	eqtri 2792	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∨ wo 860   = wceq 1567  [wsb 2097   ∈ wcel 2149  {cab 2747   ∪ cun 3909

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-9 2159  ax-ext 2741

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-ex 1807  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-un 3916

This theorem is referenced by:  dfif6  4493  unopab  5193  dmun  5901