Theorem unabw 4238

Description: Union of two class abstractions. Version of unab 4239 using implicit substitution, which does not require ax-8 2123, ax-10 2154, ax-12 2191. (Contributed by GG, 15-Oct-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
unabw.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
unabw.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unabw	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜃,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem unabw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-un 3890	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})}
2		df-clab 2720	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		unabw.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	sbievw 2106	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
5	2, 4	bitri 277	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒)
6		df-clab 2720	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
7		unabw.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
8	7	sbievw 2106	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)
9	6, 8	bitri 277	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜃)
10	5, 9	orbi12i 921	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))
11	10	abbii 2808	. 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)}
12	1, 11	eqtri 2764	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∨ wo 854   = wceq 1548  [wsb 2074   ∈ wcel 2121  {cab 2719   ∪ cun 3883

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-9 2131  ax-ext 2713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-un 3890

This theorem is referenced by:  dfif6  4460  unopab  5155  dmun  5859