Theorem unab 4254

Description: Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbor 2340	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		df-clab 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
5	3, 4	orbi12i 928	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 307	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)})
7	6	uneqri 4103	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739   ∪ cun 3897

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-v 3453  df-un 3904

This theorem is used by:  unrab  4261  rabun2  4270  hashf1lem2  14594  vdwlem6  17157  addsasslem1  28382  addsasslem2  28383  addsdilem1  28530  addsdilem2  28531  mulsasslem1  28542  mulsasslem2  28543  vtxdun  30055  satfvsuclem1  36103  satf0suclem  36119  fmlasuc0  36128  dfproplem  38621  ecun  39305  sticksstones22  43198  diophun  43763