Theorem unab 4238

Description: Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbor 2302	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2714	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2714	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		df-clab 2714	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
5	3, 4	orbi12i 913	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 304	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)})
7	6	uneqri 4091	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∨ wo 845   = wceq 1539  [wsb 2065   ∈ wcel 2104  {cab 2713   ∪ cun 3890

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-v 3439  df-un 3897

This theorem is referenced by:  unrab  4245  rabun2  4253  dmun  5832  hashf1lem2  14219  vdwlem6  16736  vtxdun  27897  satfvsuclem1  33370  satf0suclem  33386  fmlasuc0  33395  sticksstones22  40324  diophun  40790