Theorem unab 4254

Description: Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbor 2339	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2739	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2739	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		df-clab 2739	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
5	3, 4	orbi12i 928	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 307	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)})
7	6	uneqri 4103	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2738   ∪ cun 3897

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-v 3452  df-un 3904

This theorem is used by:  unrab  4261  rabun2  4270  hashf1lem2  14521  vdwlem6  17078  addsasslem1  28268  addsasslem2  28269  addsdilem1  28416  addsdilem2  28417  mulsasslem1  28428  mulsasslem2  28429  vtxdun  29941  satfvsuclem1  35938  satf0suclem  35954  fmlasuc0  35963  ecun  39141  sticksstones22  43034  diophun  43618