Theorem unopab 5171

Description: Union of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unopab	⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unopab

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2735	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
2	1	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	2exbidv 1925	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
4	1	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	2exbidv 1925	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
6	3, 5	unabw 4257	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑤 ∣ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))}
7		19.43 1883	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
8		andi 1009	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
9	8	exbii 1849	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
10		19.43 1883	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
11	9, 10	bitr2i 276	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
12	11	exbii 1849	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
13	7, 12	bitr3i 277	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
14	13	abbii 2798	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ∨ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
15	6, 14	eqtri 2754	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
16		df-opab 5154	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
17		df-opab 5154	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
18	16, 17	uneq12i 4116	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = ({𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
19		df-opab 5154	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
20	15, 18, 19	3eqtr4i 2764	1 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1541  ∃wex 1780  {cab 2709   ∪ cun 3900  ⟨cop 4582  {copab 5153

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-v 3438  df-un 3907  df-opab 5154

This theorem is referenced by:  xpundi  5685  xpundir  5686  cnvun  6089  coundi  6194  coundir  6195  mptun  6627  opsrtoslem1  21988  lgsquadlem3  27318