| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > upgr1wlkdlem2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Lemma 2 for upgr1wlkd 30771. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| upgr1wlkd.p | ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 |
| upgr1wlkd.f | ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 |
| upgr1wlkd.x | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) |
| upgr1wlkd.y | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) |
| upgr1wlkd.j | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| upgr1wlkdlem2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | upgr1wlkd.j | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) | |
| 2 | ssid 3935 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌} | |
| 3 | sseq2 3939 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌} → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌})) | |
| 4 | 3 | adantl 487 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) ∧ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌})) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | mpbiri 261 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) ∧ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽)) |
| 6 | 1, 5 | mpidan 702 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2147 ≠ wne 2959 ⊆ wss 3900 {cpr 4590 ‘cfv 6561 〈“cs1 14772 〈“cs2 15023 Vtxcvtx 29607 iEdgciedg 29608 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-9 2157 ax-ext 2735 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-ex 1813 df-cleq 2755 df-ss 3901 |
| This theorem is used by: upgr1wlkd 30771 upgr1trld 30772 upgr1pthd 30773 upgr1pthond 30774 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |