Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 299 of 466) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29289) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29290-30812) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30813-46532) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | pjpoi 29801 | Projection in terms of orthocomplement projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | pjoc1i 29802 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | pjchi 29803 | Projection of a vector in the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(ii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | pjoccl 29804 | The part of a vector that belongs to the orthocomplemented space. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)) | ||
Theorem | pjoc1 29805 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | pjomli 29806 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 29775. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml 29807 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 29775. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjococi 29808 | Proof of orthocomplement theorem using projections. Compare ococ 29777. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐻)) = 𝐻 | ||
Theorem | pjoc2i 29809 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | pjoc2 29810 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | sh0le 29811 | The zero subspace is the smallest subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ch0le 29812 | The zero subspace is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | shle0 29813 | No subspace is smaller than the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | chle0 29814 | No Hilbert lattice element is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | chnlen0 29815 | A Hilbert lattice element that is not a subset of another is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | ch0pss 29816 | The zero subspace is a proper subset of nonzero Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (0ℋ ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | orthin 29817 | The intersection of orthogonal subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | ssjo 29818 | The lattice join of a subset with its orthocomplement is the whole space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
Theorem | shne0i 29819* | A nonzero subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | shs0i 29820 | Hilbert subspace sum with the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | shs00i 29821 | Two subspaces are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | ch0lei 29822 | The closed subspace zero is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chle0i 29823 | No Hilbert closed subspace is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chne0i 29824* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | chocini 29825 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | chj0i 29826 | Join with lattice zero in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chm1i 29827 | Meet with lattice one in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chjcli 29828 | Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
Theorem | chsleji 29829 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chseli 29830* | Membership in subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | chincli 29831 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
Theorem | chsscon3i 29832 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chsscon1i 29833 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chsscon2i 29834 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chcon2i 29835 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chcon1i 29836 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chcon3i 29837 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chunssji 29838 | Union is smaller than Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chjcomi 29839 | Commutative law for join in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chub1i 29840 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chub2i 29841 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chlubi 29842 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | chlubii 29843 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements (one direction of chlubi 29842). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | chlej1i 29844 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej2i 29845 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlej12i 29846 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb1i 29847 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmm1i 29848 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm2i 29849 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm3i 29850 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmm4i 29851 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmj1i 29852 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj2i 29853 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj3i 29854 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmj4i 29855 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chnlei 29856 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chjassi 29857 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chj00i 29858 | Two Hilbert lattice elements are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chjoi 29859 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ | ||
Theorem | chj1i 29860 | Join with Hilbert lattice unit. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ℋ) = ℋ | ||
Theorem | chm0i 29861 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | chm0 29862 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | shjshsi 29863 | Hilbert lattice join equals the double orthocomplement of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (⊥‘(⊥‘(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | shjshseli 29864 | A closed subspace sum equals Hilbert lattice join. Part of Lemma 31.1.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chne0 29865* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | chocin 29866 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chssoc 29867 | A closed subspace less than its orthocomplement is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | chj0 29868 | Join with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chslej 29869 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chincl 29870 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
Theorem | chsscon3 29871 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chsscon1 29872 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chsscon2 29873 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon3 29874 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon1 29875 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon2 29876 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chjcom 29877 | Commutative law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chub1 29878 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chub2 29879 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chlub 29880 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej1 29881 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej2 29882 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb1 29883 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb2 29884 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chnle 29885 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chjo 29886 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement is all of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chabs1 29887 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chabs2 29888 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chabs1i 29889 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chabs2i 29890 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chjidm 29891 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chjidmi 29892 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chj12i 29893 | A rearrangement of Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chj4i 29894 | Rearrangement of the join of 4 Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | chjjdiri 29895 | Hilbert lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm1 29896 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmm2 29897 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmm3 29898 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm4 29899 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj1 29900 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |