Theorem 3bitr2rd 216

Description: Deduction from transitivity of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3bitr2d.1	|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
3bitr2d.2	|- ( ph -> ( th <-> ch ) )
3bitr2d.3	|- ( ph -> ( th <-> ta ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3bitr2rd	|- ( ph -> ( ta <-> ps ) )

Proof of Theorem 3bitr2rd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3bitr2d.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
2		3bitr2d.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( th <-> ch ) )
3	1, 2	bitr4d 190	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> th ) )
4		3bitr2d.3	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( th <-> ta ) )
5	3, 4	bitr2d 188	1 |- ( ph -> ( ta <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116

This theorem is referenced by:  fndmdif  5601  addsubeq4  8134  muleqadd  8586  nn0lt10b  9292  adddivflid  10248  frec2uzltd  10359  mul0inf  11204  summodnegmod  11784  lgsdilem  13722  lgsne0  13733  iooref1o  14066