Theorem ax16 1785

Description: Theorem showing that ax-16 1786 is redundant if ax-17 1506 is included in the axiom system. The important part of the proof is provided by aev 1784.

See ax16ALT 1831 for an alternate proof that does not require ax-10 1483 or ax-12 1489.

This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-16 1786 below so that theorems needing ax-16 1786 can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax16	|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem ax16

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		aev 1784	. 2 |- ( A. x x = y -> A. z x = z )
2		ax-17 1506	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> A. z ph )
3		sbequ12 1744	. . . . 5 |- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> [ z / x ] ph ) )
4	3	biimpcd 158	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( x = z -> [ z / x ] ph ) )
5	2, 4	alimdh 1443	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( A. z x = z -> A. z [ z / x ] ph ) )
6	2	hbsb3 1780	. . . 4 |- ( [ z / x ] ph -> A. x [ z / x ] ph )
7		stdpc7 1743	. . . 4 |- ( z = x -> ( [ z / x ] ph -> ph ) )
8	6, 2, 7	cbv3h 1721	. . 3 |- ( A. z [ z / x ] ph -> A. x ph )
9	5, 8	syl6com 35	. 2 |- ( A. z x = z -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )
10	1, 9	syl 14	1 |- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1329   [wsb 1735

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736

This theorem is referenced by:  dveeq2  1787  dveeq2or  1788  a16g  1836  exists2  2094