Theorem csbiebg 3114

Description: Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis x = A -> B = C and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
csbiebg.2	|- F/_ x C

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbiebg	|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> B = C ) <-> [_ A / x ]_ B = C ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   B( x)   C( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem csbiebg

Dummy variable a is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2199	. . . 4 |- ( a = A -> ( x = a <-> x = A ) )
2	1	imbi1d 231	. . 3 |- ( a = A -> ( ( x = a -> B = C ) <-> ( x = A -> B = C ) ) )
3	2	albidv 1835	. 2 |- ( a = A -> ( A. x ( x = a -> B = C ) <-> A. x ( x = A -> B = C ) ) )
4		csbeq1 3075	. . 3 |- ( a = A -> [_ a / x ]_ B = [_ A / x ]_ B )
5	4	eqeq1d 2198	. 2 |- ( a = A -> ( [_ a / x ]_ B = C <-> [_ A / x ]_ B = C ) )
6		vex 2755	. . 3 |- a e. _V
7		csbiebg.2	. . 3 |- F/_ x C
8	6, 7	csbieb 3113	. 2 |- ( A. x ( x = a -> B = C ) <-> [_ a / x ]_ B = C )
9	3, 5, 8	vtoclbg 2813	1 |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> B = C ) <-> [_ A / x ]_ B = C ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1362   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2160   F/_wnfc 2319   [_csb 3072

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-v 2754  df-sbc 2978  df-csb 3073

This theorem is referenced by: (None)