Theorem csbiebg 3147

Description: Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
csbiebg.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbiebg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem csbiebg

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2219	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑎 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
2	1	imbi1d 231	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
3	2	albidv 1850	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
4		csbeq1 3107	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
5	4	eqeq1d 2218	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
6		vex 2782	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
7		csbiebg.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
8	6, 7	csbieb 3146	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
9	3, 5, 8	vtoclbg 2842	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1373   = wceq 1375   ∈ wcel 2180  Ⅎwnfc 2339  ⦋csb 3104

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 713  ax-5 1473  ax-7 1474  ax-gen 1475  ax-ie1 1519  ax-ie2 1520  ax-8 1530  ax-10 1531  ax-11 1532  ax-i12 1533  ax-bndl 1535  ax-4 1536  ax-17 1552  ax-i9 1556  ax-ial 1560  ax-i5r 1561  ax-ext 2191

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 985  df-tru 1378  df-nf 1487  df-sb 1789  df-clab 2196  df-cleq 2202  df-clel 2205  df-nfc 2341  df-v 2781  df-sbc 3009  df-csb 3105

This theorem is referenced by: (None)