Theorem csbiebg 3190

Description: Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
csbiebg.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbiebg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem csbiebg

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2248	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑎 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
2	1	imbi1d 231	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
3	2	albidv 1877	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
4		csbeq1 3150	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
5	4	eqeq1d 2247	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
6		vex 2824	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
7		csbiebg.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
8	6, 7	csbieb 3189	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
9	3, 5, 8	vtoclbg 2884	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1400   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  Ⅎwnfc 2379  ⦋csb 3147

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148

This theorem is referenced by: (None)