Theorem csbiebg 3101

Description: Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
csbiebg.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbiebg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem csbiebg

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2187	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑎 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
2	1	imbi1d 231	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
3	2	albidv 1824	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
4		csbeq1 3062	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
5	4	eqeq1d 2186	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
6		vex 2742	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
7		csbiebg.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
8	6, 7	csbieb 3100	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
9	3, 5, 8	vtoclbg 2800	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1351   = wceq 1353   ∈ wcel 2148  Ⅎwnfc 2306  ⦋csb 3059

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-v 2741  df-sbc 2965  df-csb 3060

This theorem is referenced by: (None)