Theorem eqabdv 2325

Description: Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
eqabdv.1	|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqabdv	|- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   ph, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem eqabdv

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqabdv.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )
2	1	sbbidv 1899	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> [ y / x ] ps ) )
3		clelsb1 2301	. . . 4 |- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
4	3	bicomi 132	. . 3 |- ( y e. A <-> [ y / x ] x e. A )
5		df-clab 2183	. . 3 |- ( y e. { x | ps } <-> [ y / x ] ps )
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr4g 223	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( y e. A <-> y e. { x | ps } ) )
7	6	eqrdv 2194	1 |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   [wsb 1776   e. wcel 2167   {cab 2182

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192

This theorem is referenced by:  wrdval  10938  wrdnval  10965  dfrhm2  13710  rspsn  14090