P. 24 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2301-2400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eleq2i 2301	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( C e. A <-> C e. B )
Theorem	eleq12i 2302	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- ( A e. C <-> B e. D )
Theorem	eleq1d 2303	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. C <-> B e. C ) )
Theorem	eleq2d 2304	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C e. A <-> C e. B ) )
Theorem	eleq12d 2305	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. C <-> B e. D ) )
Theorem	eleq1a 2306	A transitive-type law relating membership and equality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A e. B -> ( C = A -> C e. B ) )
Theorem	eqeltri 2307	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eqeltrri 2308	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   &    |- A e. C   =>    |- B e. C
Theorem	eleqtri 2309	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. B   &    |- B = C   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eleqtrri 2310	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. B   &    |- C = B   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eqeltrd 2311	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation, deduction form. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Dec-2002.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrd 2312	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> B e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrd 2313	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrd 2314	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	3eltr3i 2315	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- A e. B   &    |- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- C e. D
Theorem	3eltr4i 2316	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- A e. B   &    |- C = A   &    |- D = B   =>    |- C e. D
Theorem	3eltr3d 2317	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ph -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr4d 2318	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = A )   &    |- ( ph -> D = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr3g 2319	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr4g 2320	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- C = A   &    |- D = B   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	eqeltrid 2321	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrid 2322	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- B = A   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrid 2323	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A e. B   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrid 2324	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A e. B   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrdi 2325	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrdi 2326	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> B = A )   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrdi 2327	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- B = C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrdi 2328	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- C = B   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleq2s 2329	Substitution of equal classes into a membership antecedent. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> ph )   &    |- C = B   =>    |- ( A e. C -> ph )
Theorem	eqneltrd 2330	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )
Theorem	eqneltrrd 2331	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )
Theorem	neleqtrd 2332	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. B )
Theorem	neleqtrrd 2333	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. A )
Theorem	cleqh 2334*	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqf 2411. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( A = B <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> x e. B ) )
Theorem	nelneq 2335	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1997.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ -. B e. C ) -> -. A = B )
Theorem	nelneq2 2336	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ -. A e. C ) -> -. B = C )
Theorem	eqsb1lem 2337*	Lemma for eqsb1 2338. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	eqsb1 2338*	Substitution for the left-hand side in an equality. Class version of equsb3 2007. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	clelsb1 2339*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2212). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
Theorem	clelsb2 2340*	Substitution for the second argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb2 2213). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A e. x <-> A e. y )
Theorem	hbxfreq 2341	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfrbi 1521 for equivalence version. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )
Theorem	hblem 2342*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- ( z e. A -> A. x z e. A )
Theorem	abeq2 2343*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2353 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable ph (that has a free variable x) to a theorem with a class variable A, we substitute x e. A for ph throughout and simplify, where A is a new class variable not already in the wff. Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable A to one with ph, we substitute { x | ph } for A throughout and simplify, where x and ph are new set and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = { x | ph } <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) )
Theorem	abeq1 2344*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
|- ( { x | ph } = A <-> A. x ( ph <-> x e. A ) )
Theorem	abeq2i 2345	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.)
|- A = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( x e. A <-> ph )
Theorem	abeq1i 2346	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.)
|- { x | ph } = A   =>    |- ( ph <-> x e. A )
Theorem	abeq2d 2347	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )
Theorem	abbibcom 2348	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) <-> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi2i 2349*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x e. A <-> ph )   =>    |- A = { x | ph }
Theorem	abbii 2350	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { x | ps }
Theorem	abbid 2351	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbib 2352	Equal class abstractions require equivalent formulas, and conversely. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-8 1553 and df-clel 2230 (by avoiding use of cleqh 2334). (Revised by BJ, 23-Jun-2019.) Definitial form. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Feb-2025.)
|- ( { x | ph } = { x | ps } <-> A. x ( ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	abbi 2353	Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2352, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) -> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbidv 2354*	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbi2dv 2355*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi1dv 2356*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> x e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = A )
Theorem	abid2 2357*	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
|- { x | x e. A } = A
Theorem	sb8ab 2358	Substitution of variable in class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | [ y / x ] ph }
Theorem	cbvabw 2359*	Version of cbvab 2360 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvab 2360	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvabv 2361*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	clelab 2362*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	clabel 2363*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
|- ( { x | ph } e. A <-> E. y ( y e. A /\ A. x ( x e. y <-> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sbab 2364*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of y for x into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- ( x = y -> A = { z | [ y / x ] z e. A } )
2.1.2.1  Elementary properties of class abstractions
Theorem	eqabdv 2365*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )
Theorem	eqabcdv 2366*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> x e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = A )
Theorem	eqabi 2367*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
|- ( x e. A <-> ph )   =>    |- A = { x | ph }
Theorem	abid1 2368*	Every class is equal to a class abstraction (the class of sets belonging to it). Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. This is a generalization to classes of cvjust 2229. The proof does not rely on cvjust 2229, so cvjust 2229 could be proved as a special instance of it. Note however that abid1 2368 necessarily relies on df-clel 2230, whereas cvjust 2229 does not. This theorem requires ax-ext 2216, df-clab 2221, df-cleq 2227, df-clel 2230, but to prove that any specific class term not containing class variables is a setvar or is equal to a class abstraction does not require these $a-statements. This last fact is a metatheorem, consequence of the fact that the only $a-statements with typecode class are cv 1397, cab 2220, and statements corresponding to defined class constructors. Note on the simultaneous presence in set.mm of this abid1 2368 and its commuted form abid2 2357: It is rare that two forms so closely related both appear in set.mm. Indeed, such equalities are generally used in later proofs as parts of transitive inferences, and with the many variants of eqtri 2255 (search for *eqtr*), it would be rare that either one would shorten a proof compared to the other. There is typically a choice between what we call a "definitional form", where the shorter expression is on the LHS (left-hand side), and a "computational form", where the shorter expression is on the RHS (right-hand side). An example is df-2 9313 versus 1p1e2 9371. We do not need 1p1e2 9371, but because it occurs "naturally" in computations, it can be useful to have it directly, together with a uniform set of 1-digit operations like 1p2e3 9389, etc. In most cases, we do not need both a definitional and a computational forms. A definitional form would favor consistency with genuine definitions, while a computational form is often more natural. The situation is similar with biconditionals in propositional calculus: see for instance pm4.24 395 and anidm 396, while other biconditionals generally appear in a single form (either definitional, but more often computational). In the present case, the equality is important enough that both abid1 2368 and abid2 2357 are in set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 10-Nov-2020.)
|- A = { x | x e. A }
Theorem	eqab 2369*	One direction of eqabb 2370. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 13-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) -> A = { x | ph } )
Theorem	eqabb 2370*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbib 2352 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable ph (that has a free variable x) to a theorem with a class variable A, we substitute x e. A for ph throughout and simplify, where A is a new class variable not already in the wff. An example is the conversion of zfauscl 4235 to inex1 4249 (look at the instance of zfauscl 4235 that occurs in the proof of inex1 4249). Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable A to one with ph, we substitute { x | ph } for A throughout and simplify, where x and ph are new setvar and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A = { x | ph } <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) )
Theorem	eqabcb 2371*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. Commuted form of eqabb 2370. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
|- ( { x | ph } = A <-> A. x ( ph <-> x e. A ) )
Theorem	eqabrd 2372	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction form of eqabb 2370). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2373	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcjust 2374*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. y F/ x y e. A <-> A. z F/ x z e. A )
Definition	df-nfc 2375*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read " x is not free in A". Not-free means that the value of x cannot affect the value of A, e.g., any occurrence of x in A is effectively bound by a quantifier or something that expands to one (such as "there exists at most one"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1510 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A <-> A. y F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfci 2376*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x y e. A   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcii 2377*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcr 2378*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A -> F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfcrii 2379*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )
Theorem	nfcri 2380*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Note that unlike nfcr 2378, this does not require y and A to be disjoint.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x y e. A
Theorem	nfcd 2381*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfceqi 2382	Equality theorem for class not-free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( F/_ x A <-> F/_ x B )
Theorem	nfcxfr 2383	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcxfrd 2384	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfceqdf 2385	An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F/_ x A <-> F/_ x B ) )
Theorem	nfcv 2386*	If x is disjoint from A, then x is not free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcvd 2387*	If x is disjoint from A, then x is not free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfab1 2388	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x { x | ph }
Theorem	nfnfc1 2389	x is bound in F/_ x A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x F/_ x A
Theorem	clelsb1f 2390	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2212). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
Theorem	nfab 2391	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/_ x { y | ph }
Theorem	nfaba1 2392	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x { y | A. x ph }
Theorem	nfnfc 2393	Hypothesis builder for F/_ y A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x F/_ y A
Theorem	nfeq 2394	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel 2395	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfeq1 2396*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel1 2397*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfeq2 2398*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel2 2399*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfcrd 2400*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )