P. 24 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2301-2400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eleq1d 2301	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. C <-> B e. C ) )
Theorem	eleq2d 2302	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C e. A <-> C e. B ) )
Theorem	eleq12d 2303	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. C <-> B e. D ) )
Theorem	eleq1a 2304	A transitive-type law relating membership and equality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A e. B -> ( C = A -> C e. B ) )
Theorem	eqeltri 2305	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eqeltrri 2306	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   &    |- A e. C   =>    |- B e. C
Theorem	eleqtri 2307	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. B   &    |- B = C   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eleqtrri 2308	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. B   &    |- C = B   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eqeltrd 2309	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation, deduction form. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Dec-2002.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrd 2310	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> B e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrd 2311	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrd 2312	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	3eltr3i 2313	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- A e. B   &    |- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- C e. D
Theorem	3eltr4i 2314	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- A e. B   &    |- C = A   &    |- D = B   =>    |- C e. D
Theorem	3eltr3d 2315	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ph -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr4d 2316	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = A )   &    |- ( ph -> D = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr3g 2317	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr4g 2318	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- C = A   &    |- D = B   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	eqeltrid 2319	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrid 2320	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- B = A   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrid 2321	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A e. B   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrid 2322	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A e. B   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrdi 2323	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrdi 2324	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> B = A )   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrdi 2325	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- B = C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrdi 2326	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- C = B   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleq2s 2327	Substitution of equal classes into a membership antecedent. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> ph )   &    |- C = B   =>    |- ( A e. C -> ph )
Theorem	eqneltrd 2328	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )
Theorem	eqneltrrd 2329	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )
Theorem	neleqtrd 2330	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. B )
Theorem	neleqtrrd 2331	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. A )
Theorem	cleqh 2332*	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqf 2409. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( A = B <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> x e. B ) )
Theorem	nelneq 2333	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1997.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ -. B e. C ) -> -. A = B )
Theorem	nelneq2 2334	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ -. A e. C ) -> -. B = C )
Theorem	eqsb1lem 2335*	Lemma for eqsb1 2336. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	eqsb1 2336*	Substitution for the left-hand side in an equality. Class version of equsb3 2005. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	clelsb1 2337*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2210). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
Theorem	clelsb2 2338*	Substitution for the second argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb2 2211). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A e. x <-> A e. y )
Theorem	hbxfreq 2339	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfrbi 1521 for equivalence version. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )
Theorem	hblem 2340*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- ( z e. A -> A. x z e. A )
Theorem	abeq2 2341*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2351 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable ph (that has a free variable x) to a theorem with a class variable A, we substitute x e. A for ph throughout and simplify, where A is a new class variable not already in the wff. Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable A to one with ph, we substitute { x | ph } for A throughout and simplify, where x and ph are new set and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = { x | ph } <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) )
Theorem	abeq1 2342*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
|- ( { x | ph } = A <-> A. x ( ph <-> x e. A ) )
Theorem	abeq2i 2343	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.)
|- A = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( x e. A <-> ph )
Theorem	abeq1i 2344	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.)
|- { x | ph } = A   =>    |- ( ph <-> x e. A )
Theorem	abeq2d 2345	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )
Theorem	abbibcom 2346	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) <-> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi2i 2347*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x e. A <-> ph )   =>    |- A = { x | ph }
Theorem	abbii 2348	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { x | ps }
Theorem	abbid 2349	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbib 2350	Equal class abstractions require equivalent formulas, and conversely. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-8 1553 and df-clel 2228 (by avoiding use of cleqh 2332). (Revised by BJ, 23-Jun-2019.) Definitial form. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Feb-2025.)
|- ( { x | ph } = { x | ps } <-> A. x ( ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	abbi 2351	Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2350, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) -> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbidv 2352*	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbi2dv 2353*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi1dv 2354*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> x e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = A )
Theorem	abid2 2355*	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
|- { x | x e. A } = A
Theorem	sb8ab 2356	Substitution of variable in class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | [ y / x ] ph }
Theorem	cbvabw 2357*	Version of cbvab 2358 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvab 2358	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvabv 2359*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	clelab 2360*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	clabel 2361*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
|- ( { x | ph } e. A <-> E. y ( y e. A /\ A. x ( x e. y <-> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sbab 2362*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of y for x into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- ( x = y -> A = { z | [ y / x ] z e. A } )
2.1.2.1  Elementary properties of class abstractions
Theorem	eqabdv 2363*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )
Theorem	eqabcdv 2364*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> x e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = A )
Theorem	eqabi 2365*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
|- ( x e. A <-> ph )   =>    |- A = { x | ph }
Theorem	abid1 2366*	Every class is equal to a class abstraction (the class of sets belonging to it). Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. This is a generalization to classes of cvjust 2227. The proof does not rely on cvjust 2227, so cvjust 2227 could be proved as a special instance of it. Note however that abid1 2366 necessarily relies on df-clel 2228, whereas cvjust 2227 does not. This theorem requires ax-ext 2214, df-clab 2219, df-cleq 2225, df-clel 2228, but to prove that any specific class term not containing class variables is a setvar or is equal to a class abstraction does not require these $a-statements. This last fact is a metatheorem, consequence of the fact that the only $a-statements with typecode class are cv 1397, cab 2218, and statements corresponding to defined class constructors. Note on the simultaneous presence in set.mm of this abid1 2366 and its commuted form abid2 2355: It is rare that two forms so closely related both appear in set.mm. Indeed, such equalities are generally used in later proofs as parts of transitive inferences, and with the many variants of eqtri 2253 (search for *eqtr*), it would be rare that either one would shorten a proof compared to the other. There is typically a choice between what we call a "definitional form", where the shorter expression is on the LHS (left-hand side), and a "computational form", where the shorter expression is on the RHS (right-hand side). An example is df-2 9296 versus 1p1e2 9354. We do not need 1p1e2 9354, but because it occurs "naturally" in computations, it can be useful to have it directly, together with a uniform set of 1-digit operations like 1p2e3 9372, etc. In most cases, we do not need both a definitional and a computational forms. A definitional form would favor consistency with genuine definitions, while a computational form is often more natural. The situation is similar with biconditionals in propositional calculus: see for instance pm4.24 395 and anidm 396, while other biconditionals generally appear in a single form (either definitional, but more often computational). In the present case, the equality is important enough that both abid1 2366 and abid2 2355 are in set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 10-Nov-2020.)
|- A = { x | x e. A }
Theorem	eqab 2367*	One direction of eqabb 2368. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 13-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) -> A = { x | ph } )
Theorem	eqabb 2368*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbib 2350 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable ph (that has a free variable x) to a theorem with a class variable A, we substitute x e. A for ph throughout and simplify, where A is a new class variable not already in the wff. An example is the conversion of zfauscl 4230 to inex1 4244 (look at the instance of zfauscl 4230 that occurs in the proof of inex1 4244). Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable A to one with ph, we substitute { x | ph } for A throughout and simplify, where x and ph are new setvar and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A = { x | ph } <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) )
Theorem	eqabcb 2369*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. Commuted form of eqabb 2368. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
|- ( { x | ph } = A <-> A. x ( ph <-> x e. A ) )
Theorem	eqabrd 2370	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction form of eqabb 2368). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2371	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcjust 2372*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2373. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. y F/ x y e. A <-> A. z F/ x z e. A )
Definition	df-nfc 2373*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read " x is not free in A". Not-free means that the value of x cannot affect the value of A, e.g., any occurrence of x in A is effectively bound by a quantifier or something that expands to one (such as "there exists at most one"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1510 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A <-> A. y F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfci 2374*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x y e. A   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcii 2375*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcr 2376*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A -> F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfcrii 2377*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )
Theorem	nfcri 2378*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Note that unlike nfcr 2376, this does not require y and A to be disjoint.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x y e. A
Theorem	nfcd 2379*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfceqi 2380	Equality theorem for class not-free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( F/_ x A <-> F/_ x B )
Theorem	nfcxfr 2381	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcxfrd 2382	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfceqdf 2383	An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F/_ x A <-> F/_ x B ) )
Theorem	nfcv 2384*	If x is disjoint from A, then x is not free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcvd 2385*	If x is disjoint from A, then x is not free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfab1 2386	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x { x | ph }
Theorem	nfnfc1 2387	x is bound in F/_ x A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x F/_ x A
Theorem	clelsb1f 2388	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2210). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
Theorem	nfab 2389	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/_ x { y | ph }
Theorem	nfaba1 2390	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x { y | A. x ph }
Theorem	nfnfc 2391	Hypothesis builder for F/_ y A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x F/_ y A
Theorem	nfeq 2392	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel 2393	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfeq1 2394*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel1 2395*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfeq2 2396*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel2 2397*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfcrd 2398*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfeqd 2399	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A = B )
Theorem	nfeld 2400	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A e. B )