P. 24 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2301-2400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eqneltrd 2301	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )
Theorem	eqneltrrd 2302	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )
Theorem	neleqtrd 2303	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. B )
Theorem	neleqtrrd 2304	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. A )
Theorem	cleqh 2305*	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqf 2373. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( A = B <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> x e. B ) )
Theorem	nelneq 2306	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1997.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ -. B e. C ) -> -. A = B )
Theorem	nelneq2 2307	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ -. A e. C ) -> -. B = C )
Theorem	eqsb1lem 2308*	Lemma for eqsb1 2309. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	eqsb1 2309*	Substitution for the left-hand side in an equality. Class version of equsb3 1979. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	clelsb1 2310*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2183). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
Theorem	clelsb2 2311*	Substitution for the second argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb2 2184). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A e. x <-> A e. y )
Theorem	hbxfreq 2312	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfrbi 1495 for equivalence version. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )
Theorem	hblem 2313*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- ( z e. A -> A. x z e. A )
Theorem	abeq2 2314*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2319 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable ph (that has a free variable x) to a theorem with a class variable A, we substitute x e. A for ph throughout and simplify, where A is a new class variable not already in the wff. Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable A to one with ph, we substitute { x | ph } for A throughout and simplify, where x and ph are new set and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = { x | ph } <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) )
Theorem	abeq1 2315*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
|- ( { x | ph } = A <-> A. x ( ph <-> x e. A ) )
Theorem	abeq2i 2316	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.)
|- A = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( x e. A <-> ph )
Theorem	abeq1i 2317	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.)
|- { x | ph } = A   =>    |- ( ph <-> x e. A )
Theorem	abeq2d 2318	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )
Theorem	abbi 2319	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) <-> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi2i 2320*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x e. A <-> ph )   =>    |- A = { x | ph }
Theorem	abbii 2321	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { x | ps }
Theorem	abbid 2322	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbidv 2323*	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbi2dv 2324*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi1dv 2325*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> x e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = A )
Theorem	abid2 2326*	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
|- { x | x e. A } = A
Theorem	sb8ab 2327	Substitution of variable in class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | [ y / x ] ph }
Theorem	cbvabw 2328*	Version of cbvab 2329 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvab 2329	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvabv 2330*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	clelab 2331*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	clabel 2332*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
|- ( { x | ph } e. A <-> E. y ( y e. A /\ A. x ( x e. y <-> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sbab 2333*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of y for x into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- ( x = y -> A = { z | [ y / x ] z e. A } )
2.1.2.1  Elementary properties of class abstractions
Theorem	eqabdv 2334*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2335	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcjust 2336*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2337. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. y F/ x y e. A <-> A. z F/ x z e. A )
Definition	df-nfc 2337*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read " x is not free in A". Not-free means that the value of x cannot affect the value of A, e.g., any occurrence of x in A is effectively bound by a quantifier or something that expands to one (such as "there exists at most one"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1484 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A <-> A. y F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfci 2338*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x y e. A   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcii 2339*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcr 2340*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A -> F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfcrii 2341*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )
Theorem	nfcri 2342*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Note that unlike nfcr 2340, this does not require y and A to be disjoint.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x y e. A
Theorem	nfcd 2343*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfceqi 2344	Equality theorem for class not-free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( F/_ x A <-> F/_ x B )
Theorem	nfcxfr 2345	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcxfrd 2346	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfceqdf 2347	An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F/_ x A <-> F/_ x B ) )
Theorem	nfcv 2348*	If x is disjoint from A, then x is not free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcvd 2349*	If x is disjoint from A, then x is not free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	nfab1 2350	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x { x | ph }
Theorem	nfnfc1 2351	x is bound in F/_ x A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x F/_ x A
Theorem	clelsb1f 2352	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2183). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
Theorem	nfab 2353	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/_ x { y | ph }
Theorem	nfaba1 2354	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x { y | A. x ph }
Theorem	nfnfc 2355	Hypothesis builder for F/_ y A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x F/_ y A
Theorem	nfeq 2356	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel 2357	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfeq1 2358*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel1 2359*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfeq2 2360*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A = B
Theorem	nfel2 2361*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/ x A e. B
Theorem	nfcrd 2362*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfeqd 2363	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A = B )
Theorem	nfeld 2364	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A e. B )
Theorem	drnfc1 2365	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> A = B )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( F/_ x A <-> F/_ y B ) )
Theorem	drnfc2 2366	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> A = B )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( F/_ z A <-> F/_ z B ) )
Theorem	nfabdw 2367*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Version of nfabd 2368 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x { y | ps } )
Theorem	nfabd 2368	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x { y | ps } )
Theorem	dvelimdc 2369	Deduction form of dvelimc 2370. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ z ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ z B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( z = y -> A = B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( -. A. x x = y -> F/_ x B ) )
Theorem	dvelimc 2370	Version of dvelim 2045 for classes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ z B   &    |- ( z = y -> A = B )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> F/_ x B )
Theorem	nfcvf 2371	If x and y are distinct, then x is not free in y. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> F/_ x y )
Theorem	nfcvf2 2372	If x and y are distinct, then y is not free in x. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> F/_ y x )
Theorem	cleqf 2373	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqh 2305. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> x e. B ) )
Theorem	abid2f 2374	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- { x | x e. A } = A
Theorem	sbabel 2375*	Theorem to move a substitution in and out of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] { z | ph } e. A <-> { z | [ y / x ] ph } e. A )
2.1.4  Negated equality and membership
2.1.4.1  Negated equality
Syntax	wne 2376	Extend wff notation to include inequality.
wff A =/= B
Definition	df-ne 2377	Define inequality. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A =/= B <-> -. A = B )
Theorem	neii 2378	Inference associated with df-ne 2377. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
|- A =/= B   =>    |- -. A = B
Theorem	neir 2379	Inference associated with df-ne 2377. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
|- -. A = B   =>    |- A =/= B
Theorem	nner 2380	Negation of inequality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2018.)
|- ( A = B -> -. A =/= B )
Theorem	nnedc 2381	Negation of inequality where equality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2018.)
|- (DECID A = B -> ( -. A =/= B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	dcned 2382	Decidable equality implies decidable negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2020.)
|- ( ph -> DECID A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID A =/= B )
Theorem	neqned 2383	If it is not the case that two classes are equal, they are unequal. Converse of neneqd 2397. One-way deduction form of df-ne 2377. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) Allow a shortening of necon3bi 2426. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
|- ( ph -> -. A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A =/= B )
Theorem	neqne 2384	From non-equality to inequality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( -. A = B -> A =/= B )
Theorem	neirr 2385	No class is unequal to itself. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2018.)
|- -. A =/= A
Theorem	eqneqall 2386	A contradiction concerning equality implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A =/= B -> ph ) )
Theorem	dcne 2387	Decidable equality expressed in terms of =/=. Basically the same as df-dc 837. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Mar-2020.)
|- (DECID A = B <-> ( A = B \/ A =/= B ) )
Theorem	nonconne 2388	Law of noncontradiction with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.)
|- -. ( A = B /\ A =/= B )
Theorem	neeq1 2389	Equality theorem for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A =/= C <-> B =/= C ) )
Theorem	neeq2 2390	Equality theorem for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( C =/= A <-> C =/= B ) )
Theorem	neeq1i 2391	Inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A =/= C <-> B =/= C )
Theorem	neeq2i 2392	Inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( C =/= A <-> C =/= B )
Theorem	neeq12i 2393	Inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- ( A =/= C <-> B =/= D )
Theorem	neeq1d 2394	Deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= C <-> B =/= C ) )
Theorem	neeq2d 2395	Deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C =/= A <-> C =/= B ) )
Theorem	neeq12d 2396	Deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= C <-> B =/= D ) )
Theorem	neneqd 2397	Deduction eliminating inequality definition. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A =/= B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A = B )
Theorem	neneq 2398	From inequality to non-equality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( A =/= B -> -. A = B )
Theorem	eqnetri 2399	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
|- A = B   &    |- B =/= C   =>    |- A =/= C
Theorem	eqnetrd 2400	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> B =/= C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A =/= C )