Theorem frforeq2 4347

Description: Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frforeq2	|- ( A = B -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor R B T ) )

Proof of Theorem frforeq2

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleq 2673	. . . . 5 |- ( A = B -> ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) <-> A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) ) )
2	1	imbi1d 231	. . . 4 |- ( A = B -> ( ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) <-> ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) ) )
3	2	raleqbi1dv 2681	. . 3 |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) <-> A. x e. B ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) ) )
4		sseq1 3180	. . 3 |- ( A = B -> ( A C_ T <-> B C_ T ) )
5	3, 4	imbi12d 234	. 2 |- ( A = B -> ( ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> A C_ T ) <-> ( A. x e. B ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> B C_ T ) ) )
6		df-frfor 4333	. 2 |- (FrFor R A T <-> ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> A C_ T ) )
7		df-frfor 4333	. 2 |- (FrFor R B T <-> ( A. x e. B ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> B C_ T ) )
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4g 223	1 |- ( A = B -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor R B T ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1353   e. wcel 2148   A.wral 2455   C_ wss 3131   class class class wbr 4005  FrFor wfrfor 4329

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144  df-frfor 4333

This theorem is referenced by:  freq2  4348