P. 44 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4301-4400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sotricim 4301	One direction of sotritric 4302 holds for all weakly linear orders. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2019.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) ) -> ( B R C -> -. ( B = C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	sotritric 4302	A trichotomy relationship, given a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2019.)
|- R Or A   &    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C \/ B = C \/ C R B ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C <-> -. ( B = C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	sotritrieq 4303	A trichotomy relationship, given a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2019.)
|- R Or A   &    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C \/ B = C \/ C R B ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B = C <-> -. ( B R C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	so0 4304	Any relation is a strict ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- R Or (/)
2.3.9  Founded and set-like relations
Syntax	wfrfor 4305	Extend wff notation to include the well-founded predicate.
wff FrFor R A S
Syntax	wfr 4306	Extend wff notation to include the well-founded predicate. Read: ' R is a well-founded relation on A.'
wff R Fr A
Syntax	wse 4307	Extend wff notation to include the set-like predicate. Read: ' R is set-like on A.'
wff R Se A
Syntax	wwe 4308	Extend wff notation to include the well-ordering predicate. Read: ' R well-orders A.'
wff R We A
Definition	df-frfor 4309*	Define the well-founded relation predicate where A might be a proper class. By passing in S we allow it potentially to be a proper class rather than a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- (FrFor R A S <-> ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. S ) -> x e. S ) -> A C_ S ) )
Definition	df-frind 4310*	Define the well-founded relation predicate. In the presence of excluded middle, there are a variety of equivalent ways to define this. In our case, this definition, in terms of an inductive principle, works better than one along the lines of "there is an element which is minimal when A is ordered by R". Because s is constrained to be a set (not a proper class) here, sometimes it may be necessary to use FrFor directly rather than via Fr. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R Fr A <-> A. sFrFor R A s )
Definition	df-se 4311*	Define the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
|- ( R Se A <-> A. x e. A { y e. A | y R x } e. _V )
Definition	df-wetr 4312*	Define the well-ordering predicate. It is unusual to define "well-ordering" in the absence of excluded middle, but we mean an ordering which is like the ordering which we have for ordinals (for example, it does not entail trichotomy because ordinals do not have that as seen at ordtriexmid 4498). Given excluded middle, well-ordering is usually defined to require trichotomy (and the definition of Fr is typically also different). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R We A <-> ( R Fr A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A A. z e. A ( ( x R y /\ y R z ) -> x R z ) ) )
Theorem	seex 4313*	The R-preimage of an element of the base set in a set-like relation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( R Se A /\ B e. A ) -> { x e. A | x R B } e. _V )
Theorem	exse 4314	Any relation on a set is set-like on it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> R Se A )
Theorem	sess1 4315	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( R C_ S -> ( S Se A -> R Se A ) )
Theorem	sess2 4316	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( R Se B -> R Se A ) )
Theorem	seeq1 4317	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R Se A <-> S Se A ) )
Theorem	seeq2 4318	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Se A <-> R Se B ) )
Theorem	nfse 4319	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R Se A
Theorem	epse 4320	The epsilon relation is set-like on any class. (This is the origin of the term "set-like": a set-like relation "acts like" the epsilon relation of sets and their elements.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- _E Se A
Theorem	frforeq1 4321	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R = S -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor S A T ) )
Theorem	freq1 4322	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R Fr A <-> S Fr A ) )
Theorem	frforeq2 4323	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A = B -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor R B T ) )
Theorem	freq2 4324	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Fr A <-> R Fr B ) )
Theorem	frforeq3 4325	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( S = T -> (FrFor R A S <-> FrFor R A T ) )
Theorem	nffrfor 4326	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x S   =>    |- F/ xFrFor R A S
Theorem	nffr 4327	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R Fr A
Theorem	frirrg 4328	A well-founded relation is irreflexive. This is the case where A exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( R Fr A /\ A e. V /\ B e. A ) -> -. B R B )
Theorem	fr0 4329	Any relation is well-founded on the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- R Fr (/)
Theorem	frind 4330*	Induction over a well-founded set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2021.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( ch /\ x e. A ) -> ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> ps ) -> ph ) )   &    |- ( ch -> R Fr A )   &    |- ( ch -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ( ch /\ x e. A ) -> ph )
Theorem	efrirr 4331	Irreflexivity of the epsilon relation: a class founded by epsilon is not a member of itself. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- ( _E Fr A -> -. A e. A )
Theorem	tz7.2 4332	Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, of except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to antecedent _E Fr A. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ _E Fr A /\ B e. A ) -> ( B C_ A /\ B =/= A ) )
Theorem	nfwe 4333	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R We A
Theorem	weeq1 4334	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R We A <-> S We A ) )
Theorem	weeq2 4335	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R We A <-> R We B ) )
Theorem	wefr 4336	A well-ordering is well-founded. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
|- ( R We A -> R Fr A )
Theorem	wepo 4337	A well-ordering is a partial ordering. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( R We A /\ A e. V ) -> R Po A )
Theorem	wetrep 4338*	An epsilon well-ordering is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( _E We A /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. A /\ z e. A ) ) -> ( ( x e. y /\ y e. z ) -> x e. z ) )
Theorem	we0 4339	Any relation is a well-ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
|- R We (/)
2.3.10  Ordinals
Syntax	word 4340	Extend the definition of a wff to include the ordinal predicate.
wff Ord A
Syntax	con0 4341	Extend the definition of a class to include the class of all ordinal numbers. (The 0 in the name prevents creating a file called con.html, which causes problems in Windows.)
class On
Syntax	wlim 4342	Extend the definition of a wff to include the limit ordinal predicate.
wff Lim A
Syntax	csuc 4343	Extend class notation to include the successor function.
class suc A
Definition	df-iord 4344*	Define the ordinal predicate, which is true for a class that is transitive and whose elements are transitive. Definition of ordinal in [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic". Some sources will define a notation for ordinal order corresponding to < and <_ but we just use e. and C_ respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Oct-2018.) Use its alias dford3 4345 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( Ord A <-> ( Tr A /\ A. x e. A Tr x ) )
Theorem	dford3 4345*	Alias for df-iord 4344. Use it instead of df-iord 4344 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Oct-2018.)
|- ( Ord A <-> ( Tr A /\ A. x e. A Tr x ) )
Definition	df-on 4346	Define the class of all ordinal numbers. Definition 7.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- On = { x | Ord x }
Definition	df-ilim 4347	Define the limit ordinal predicate, which is true for an ordinal that has the empty set as an element and is not a successor (i.e. that is the union of itself). Our definition combines the definition of Lim of [BellMachover] p. 471 and Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42, and then changes A =/= (/) to (/) e. A (which would be equivalent given the law of the excluded middle, but which is not for us). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2018.) Use its alias dflim2 4348 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Theorem	dflim2 4348	Alias for df-ilim 4347. Use it instead of df-ilim 4347 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Definition	df-suc 4349	Define the successor of a class. When applied to an ordinal number, the successor means the same thing as "plus 1". Definition 7.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41, who use "+ 1" to denote this function. Our definition is a generalization to classes. Although it is not conventional to use it with proper classes, it has no effect on a proper class (sucprc 4390). Some authors denote the successor operation with a prime (apostrophe-like) symbol, such as Definition 6 of [Suppes] p. 134 and the definition of successor in [Mendelson] p. 246 (who uses the symbol "Suc" as a predicate to mean "is a successor ordinal"). The definition of successor of [Enderton] p. 68 denotes the operation with a plus-sign superscript. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- suc A = ( A u. { A } )
Theorem	ordeq 4350	Equality theorem for the ordinal predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Ord A <-> Ord B ) )
Theorem	elong 4351	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. On <-> Ord A ) )
Theorem	elon 4352	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. On <-> Ord A )
Theorem	eloni 4353	An ordinal number has the ordinal property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. On -> Ord A )
Theorem	elon2 4354	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A e. On <-> ( Ord A /\ A e. _V ) )
Theorem	limeq 4355	Equality theorem for the limit predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Lim A <-> Lim B ) )
Theorem	ordtr 4356	An ordinal class is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Ord A -> Tr A )
Theorem	ordelss 4357	An element of an ordinal class is a subset of it. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B C_ A )
Theorem	trssord 4358	A transitive subclass of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ A C_ B /\ Ord B ) -> Ord A )
Theorem	ordelord 4359	An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> Ord B )
Theorem	tron 4360	The class of all ordinal numbers is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2009.)
|- Tr On
Theorem	ordelon 4361	An element of an ordinal class is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	onelon 4362	An element of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Theorem 2.2(iii) of [BellMachover] p. 469. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	ordin 4363	The intersection of two ordinal classes is ordinal. Proposition 7.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ Ord B ) -> Ord ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	onin 4364	The intersection of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. On ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. On )
Theorem	onelss 4365	An element of an ordinal number is a subset of the number. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( B e. A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	ordtr1 4366	Transitive law for ordinal classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
|- ( Ord C -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	ontr1 4367	Transitive law for ordinal numbers. Theorem 7M(b) of [Enderton] p. 192. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
|- ( C e. On -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	onintss 4368*	If a property is true for an ordinal number, then the minimum ordinal number for which it is true is smaller or equal. Theorem Schema 61 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. On -> ( ps -> |^| { x e. On | ph } C_ A ) )
Theorem	ord0 4369	The empty set is an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1994.)
|- Ord (/)
Theorem	0elon 4370	The empty set is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(b) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- (/) e. On
Theorem	inton 4371	The intersection of the class of ordinal numbers is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2003.)
|- |^| On = (/)
Theorem	nlim0 4372	The empty set is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- -. Lim (/)
Theorem	limord 4373	A limit ordinal is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> Ord A )
Theorem	limuni 4374	A limit ordinal is its own supremum (union). (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> A = U. A )
Theorem	limuni2 4375	The union of a limit ordinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.)
|- ( Lim A -> Lim U. A )
Theorem	0ellim 4376	A limit ordinal contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
|- ( Lim A -> (/) e. A )
Theorem	limelon 4377	A limit ordinal class that is also a set is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ Lim A ) -> A e. On )
Theorem	onn0 4378	The class of all ordinal numbers is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.)
|- On =/= (/)
Theorem	onm 4379	The class of all ordinal numbers is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2019.)
|- E. x x e. On
Theorem	suceq 4380	Equality of successors. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> suc A = suc B )
Theorem	elsuci 4381	Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either A or B be sets. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. suc B -> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
Theorem	elsucg 4382	Membership in a successor. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
Theorem	elsuc2g 4383	Variant of membership in a successor, requiring that B rather than A be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
Theorem	elsuc 4384	Membership in a successor. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
Theorem	elsuc2 4385	Membership in a successor. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( B e. suc A <-> ( B e. A \/ B = A ) )
Theorem	nfsuc 4386	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for successor. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x suc A
Theorem	elelsuc 4387	Membership in a successor. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. B -> A e. suc B )
Theorem	sucel 4388*	Membership of a successor in another class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.)
|- ( suc A e. B <-> E. x e. B A. y ( y e. x <-> ( y e. A \/ y = A ) ) )
Theorem	suc0 4389	The successor of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
|- suc (/) = { (/) }
Theorem	sucprc 4390	A proper class is its own successor. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> suc A = A )
Theorem	unisuc 4391	A transitive class is equal to the union of its successor. Combines Theorem 4E of [Enderton] p. 72 and Exercise 6 of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( Tr A <-> U. suc A = A )
Theorem	unisucg 4392	A transitive class is equal to the union of its successor. Combines Theorem 4E of [Enderton] p. 72 and Exercise 6 of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( Tr A <-> U. suc A = A ) )
Theorem	sssucid 4393	A class is included in its own successor. Part of Proposition 7.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41 (generalized to arbitrary classes). (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- A C_ suc A
Theorem	sucidg 4394	Part of Proposition 7.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2012.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. suc A )
Theorem	sucid 4395	A set belongs to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2012.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. suc A
Theorem	nsuceq0g 4396	No successor is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2018.)
|- ( A e. V -> suc A =/= (/) )
Theorem	eqelsuc 4397	A set belongs to the successor of an equal set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A = B -> A e. suc B )
Theorem	iunsuc 4398*	Inductive definition for the indexed union at a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Feb-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> B = C )   =>    |- U_ x e. suc A B = ( U_ x e. A B u. C )
Theorem	suctr 4399	The successor of a transitive class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.)
|- ( Tr A -> Tr suc A )
Theorem	trsuc 4400	A set whose successor belongs to a transitive class also belongs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ suc B e. A ) -> B e. A )