P. 44 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4301-4400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	soeq2 4301	Equality theorem for the strict ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Or A <-> R Or B ) )
Theorem	sonr 4302	A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ B e. A ) -> -. B R B )
Theorem	sotr 4303	A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> ( ( B R C /\ C R D ) -> B R D ) )
Theorem	issod 4304*	An irreflexive, transitive, trichotomous relation is a linear ordering (in the sense of df-iso 4282). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) ) -> ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> R Or A )
Theorem	sowlin 4305	A strict order relation satisfies weak linearity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Oct-2018.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> ( B R C -> ( B R D \/ D R C ) ) )
Theorem	so2nr 4306	A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) ) -> -. ( B R C /\ C R B ) )
Theorem	so3nr 4307	A strict order relation has no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> -. ( B R C /\ C R D /\ D R B ) )
Theorem	sotricim 4308	One direction of sotritric 4309 holds for all weakly linear orders. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2019.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) ) -> ( B R C -> -. ( B = C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	sotritric 4309	A trichotomy relationship, given a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2019.)
|- R Or A   &    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C \/ B = C \/ C R B ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C <-> -. ( B = C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	sotritrieq 4310	A trichotomy relationship, given a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2019.)
|- R Or A   &    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C \/ B = C \/ C R B ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B = C <-> -. ( B R C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	so0 4311	Any relation is a strict ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- R Or (/)
2.3.9  Founded and set-like relations
Syntax	wfrfor 4312	Extend wff notation to include the well-founded predicate.
wff FrFor R A S
Syntax	wfr 4313	Extend wff notation to include the well-founded predicate. Read: ' R is a well-founded relation on A.'
wff R Fr A
Syntax	wse 4314	Extend wff notation to include the set-like predicate. Read: ' R is set-like on A.'
wff R Se A
Syntax	wwe 4315	Extend wff notation to include the well-ordering predicate. Read: ' R well-orders A.'
wff R We A
Definition	df-frfor 4316*	Define the well-founded relation predicate where A might be a proper class. By passing in S we allow it potentially to be a proper class rather than a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- (FrFor R A S <-> ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. S ) -> x e. S ) -> A C_ S ) )
Definition	df-frind 4317*	Define the well-founded relation predicate. In the presence of excluded middle, there are a variety of equivalent ways to define this. In our case, this definition, in terms of an inductive principle, works better than one along the lines of "there is an element which is minimal when A is ordered by R". Because s is constrained to be a set (not a proper class) here, sometimes it may be necessary to use FrFor directly rather than via Fr. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R Fr A <-> A. sFrFor R A s )
Definition	df-se 4318*	Define the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
|- ( R Se A <-> A. x e. A { y e. A | y R x } e. _V )
Definition	df-wetr 4319*	Define the well-ordering predicate. It is unusual to define "well-ordering" in the absence of excluded middle, but we mean an ordering which is like the ordering which we have for ordinals (for example, it does not entail trichotomy because ordinals do not have that as seen at ordtriexmid 4505). Given excluded middle, well-ordering is usually defined to require trichotomy (and the definition of Fr is typically also different). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R We A <-> ( R Fr A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A A. z e. A ( ( x R y /\ y R z ) -> x R z ) ) )
Theorem	seex 4320*	The R-preimage of an element of the base set in a set-like relation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( R Se A /\ B e. A ) -> { x e. A | x R B } e. _V )
Theorem	exse 4321	Any relation on a set is set-like on it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> R Se A )
Theorem	sess1 4322	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( R C_ S -> ( S Se A -> R Se A ) )
Theorem	sess2 4323	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( R Se B -> R Se A ) )
Theorem	seeq1 4324	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R Se A <-> S Se A ) )
Theorem	seeq2 4325	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Se A <-> R Se B ) )
Theorem	nfse 4326	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R Se A
Theorem	epse 4327	The epsilon relation is set-like on any class. (This is the origin of the term "set-like": a set-like relation "acts like" the epsilon relation of sets and their elements.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- _E Se A
Theorem	frforeq1 4328	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R = S -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor S A T ) )
Theorem	freq1 4329	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R Fr A <-> S Fr A ) )
Theorem	frforeq2 4330	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A = B -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor R B T ) )
Theorem	freq2 4331	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Fr A <-> R Fr B ) )
Theorem	frforeq3 4332	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( S = T -> (FrFor R A S <-> FrFor R A T ) )
Theorem	nffrfor 4333	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x S   =>    |- F/ xFrFor R A S
Theorem	nffr 4334	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R Fr A
Theorem	frirrg 4335	A well-founded relation is irreflexive. This is the case where A exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( R Fr A /\ A e. V /\ B e. A ) -> -. B R B )
Theorem	fr0 4336	Any relation is well-founded on the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- R Fr (/)
Theorem	frind 4337*	Induction over a well-founded set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2021.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( ch /\ x e. A ) -> ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> ps ) -> ph ) )   &    |- ( ch -> R Fr A )   &    |- ( ch -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ( ch /\ x e. A ) -> ph )
Theorem	efrirr 4338	Irreflexivity of the epsilon relation: a class founded by epsilon is not a member of itself. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- ( _E Fr A -> -. A e. A )
Theorem	tz7.2 4339	Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, of except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to antecedent _E Fr A. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ _E Fr A /\ B e. A ) -> ( B C_ A /\ B =/= A ) )
Theorem	nfwe 4340	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R We A
Theorem	weeq1 4341	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R We A <-> S We A ) )
Theorem	weeq2 4342	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R We A <-> R We B ) )
Theorem	wefr 4343	A well-ordering is well-founded. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
|- ( R We A -> R Fr A )
Theorem	wepo 4344	A well-ordering is a partial ordering. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( R We A /\ A e. V ) -> R Po A )
Theorem	wetrep 4345*	An epsilon well-ordering is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( _E We A /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. A /\ z e. A ) ) -> ( ( x e. y /\ y e. z ) -> x e. z ) )
Theorem	we0 4346	Any relation is a well-ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
|- R We (/)
2.3.10  Ordinals
Syntax	word 4347	Extend the definition of a wff to include the ordinal predicate.
wff Ord A
Syntax	con0 4348	Extend the definition of a class to include the class of all ordinal numbers. (The 0 in the name prevents creating a file called con.html, which causes problems in Windows.)
class On
Syntax	wlim 4349	Extend the definition of a wff to include the limit ordinal predicate.
wff Lim A
Syntax	csuc 4350	Extend class notation to include the successor function.
class suc A
Definition	df-iord 4351*	Define the ordinal predicate, which is true for a class that is transitive and whose elements are transitive. Definition of ordinal in [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic". Some sources will define a notation for ordinal order corresponding to < and <_ but we just use e. and C_ respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Oct-2018.) Use its alias dford3 4352 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( Ord A <-> ( Tr A /\ A. x e. A Tr x ) )
Theorem	dford3 4352*	Alias for df-iord 4351. Use it instead of df-iord 4351 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Oct-2018.)
|- ( Ord A <-> ( Tr A /\ A. x e. A Tr x ) )
Definition	df-on 4353	Define the class of all ordinal numbers. Definition 7.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- On = { x | Ord x }
Definition	df-ilim 4354	Define the limit ordinal predicate, which is true for an ordinal that has the empty set as an element and is not a successor (i.e. that is the union of itself). Our definition combines the definition of Lim of [BellMachover] p. 471 and Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42, and then changes A =/= (/) to (/) e. A (which would be equivalent given the law of the excluded middle, but which is not for us). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2018.) Use its alias dflim2 4355 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Theorem	dflim2 4355	Alias for df-ilim 4354. Use it instead of df-ilim 4354 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Definition	df-suc 4356	Define the successor of a class. When applied to an ordinal number, the successor means the same thing as "plus 1". Definition 7.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41, who use "+ 1" to denote this function. Our definition is a generalization to classes. Although it is not conventional to use it with proper classes, it has no effect on a proper class (sucprc 4397). Some authors denote the successor operation with a prime (apostrophe-like) symbol, such as Definition 6 of [Suppes] p. 134 and the definition of successor in [Mendelson] p. 246 (who uses the symbol "Suc" as a predicate to mean "is a successor ordinal"). The definition of successor of [Enderton] p. 68 denotes the operation with a plus-sign superscript. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- suc A = ( A u. { A } )
Theorem	ordeq 4357	Equality theorem for the ordinal predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Ord A <-> Ord B ) )
Theorem	elong 4358	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. On <-> Ord A ) )
Theorem	elon 4359	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. On <-> Ord A )
Theorem	eloni 4360	An ordinal number has the ordinal property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. On -> Ord A )
Theorem	elon2 4361	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A e. On <-> ( Ord A /\ A e. _V ) )
Theorem	limeq 4362	Equality theorem for the limit predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Lim A <-> Lim B ) )
Theorem	ordtr 4363	An ordinal class is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Ord A -> Tr A )
Theorem	ordelss 4364	An element of an ordinal class is a subset of it. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B C_ A )
Theorem	trssord 4365	A transitive subclass of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ A C_ B /\ Ord B ) -> Ord A )
Theorem	ordelord 4366	An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> Ord B )
Theorem	tron 4367	The class of all ordinal numbers is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2009.)
|- Tr On
Theorem	ordelon 4368	An element of an ordinal class is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	onelon 4369	An element of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Theorem 2.2(iii) of [BellMachover] p. 469. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	ordin 4370	The intersection of two ordinal classes is ordinal. Proposition 7.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ Ord B ) -> Ord ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	onin 4371	The intersection of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. On ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. On )
Theorem	onelss 4372	An element of an ordinal number is a subset of the number. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( B e. A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	ordtr1 4373	Transitive law for ordinal classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
|- ( Ord C -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	ontr1 4374	Transitive law for ordinal numbers. Theorem 7M(b) of [Enderton] p. 192. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
|- ( C e. On -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	onintss 4375*	If a property is true for an ordinal number, then the minimum ordinal number for which it is true is smaller or equal. Theorem Schema 61 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. On -> ( ps -> |^| { x e. On | ph } C_ A ) )
Theorem	ord0 4376	The empty set is an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1994.)
|- Ord (/)
Theorem	0elon 4377	The empty set is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(b) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- (/) e. On
Theorem	inton 4378	The intersection of the class of ordinal numbers is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2003.)
|- |^| On = (/)
Theorem	nlim0 4379	The empty set is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- -. Lim (/)
Theorem	limord 4380	A limit ordinal is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> Ord A )
Theorem	limuni 4381	A limit ordinal is its own supremum (union). (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> A = U. A )
Theorem	limuni2 4382	The union of a limit ordinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.)
|- ( Lim A -> Lim U. A )
Theorem	0ellim 4383	A limit ordinal contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
|- ( Lim A -> (/) e. A )
Theorem	limelon 4384	A limit ordinal class that is also a set is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ Lim A ) -> A e. On )
Theorem	onn0 4385	The class of all ordinal numbers is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.)
|- On =/= (/)
Theorem	onm 4386	The class of all ordinal numbers is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2019.)
|- E. x x e. On
Theorem	suceq 4387	Equality of successors. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> suc A = suc B )
Theorem	elsuci 4388	Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either A or B be sets. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. suc B -> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
Theorem	elsucg 4389	Membership in a successor. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
Theorem	elsuc2g 4390	Variant of membership in a successor, requiring that B rather than A be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
Theorem	elsuc 4391	Membership in a successor. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
Theorem	elsuc2 4392	Membership in a successor. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( B e. suc A <-> ( B e. A \/ B = A ) )
Theorem	nfsuc 4393	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for successor. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x suc A
Theorem	elelsuc 4394	Membership in a successor. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. B -> A e. suc B )
Theorem	sucel 4395*	Membership of a successor in another class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.)
|- ( suc A e. B <-> E. x e. B A. y ( y e. x <-> ( y e. A \/ y = A ) ) )
Theorem	suc0 4396	The successor of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
|- suc (/) = { (/) }
Theorem	sucprc 4397	A proper class is its own successor. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> suc A = A )
Theorem	unisuc 4398	A transitive class is equal to the union of its successor. Combines Theorem 4E of [Enderton] p. 72 and Exercise 6 of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( Tr A <-> U. suc A = A )
Theorem	unisucg 4399	A transitive class is equal to the union of its successor. Combines Theorem 4E of [Enderton] p. 72 and Exercise 6 of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( Tr A <-> U. suc A = A ) )
Theorem	sssucid 4400	A class is included in its own successor. Part of Proposition 7.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41 (generalized to arbitrary classes). (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- A C_ suc A