Theorem nfcrii 2299

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcri.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrii	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrii

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcri.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfcr 2298	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
4	3	nfri 1506	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
5	4	hblem 2272	1 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1340  Ⅎwnf 1447   ∈ wcel 2135  Ⅎwnfc 2293

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1434  ax-7 1435  ax-gen 1436  ax-ie1 1480  ax-ie2 1481  ax-8 1491  ax-10 1492  ax-11 1493  ax-i12 1494  ax-bndl 1496  ax-4 1497  ax-17 1513  ax-i9 1517  ax-ial 1521  ax-i5r 1522  ax-ext 2146

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1448  df-sb 1750  df-cleq 2157  df-clel 2160  df-nfc 2295

This theorem is referenced by:  nfcri  2300