Theorem nfcrii 2385

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcri.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrii	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrii

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcri.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfcr 2384	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
4	3	nfri 1572	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
5	4	hblem 2346	1 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1400  Ⅎwnf 1513   ∈ wcel 2209  Ⅎwnfc 2379

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381

This theorem is referenced by:  nfcri  2386