Theorem rexeqf 2669

Description: Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleq1f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
raleq1f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem rexeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleq1f.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		raleq1f.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2327	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2241	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 465	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	exbid 1616	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
7		df-rex 2461	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8		df-rex 2461	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4g 223	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1353  ∃wex 1492   ∈ wcel 2148  Ⅎwnfc 2306  ∃wrex 2456

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rex 2461

This theorem is referenced by:  rexeq  2673