| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rexeqf | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| raleq1f.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
| raleq1f.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rexeqf | ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | raleq1f.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
| 2 | raleq1f.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | nfeq 2380 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵 |
| 4 | eleq2 2293 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 5 | 4 | anbi1d 465 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 6 | 3, 5 | exbid 1662 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 7 | df-rex 2514 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | df-rex 2514 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3bitr4g 223 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1395 ∃wex 1538 ∈ wcel 2200 Ⅎwnfc 2359 ∃wrex 2509 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 714 ax-5 1493 ax-7 1494 ax-gen 1495 ax-ie1 1539 ax-ie2 1540 ax-8 1550 ax-10 1551 ax-11 1552 ax-i12 1553 ax-bndl 1555 ax-4 1556 ax-17 1572 ax-i9 1576 ax-ial 1580 ax-i5r 1581 ax-ext 2211 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1398 df-nf 1507 df-sb 1809 df-cleq 2222 df-clel 2225 df-nfc 2361 df-rex 2514 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rexeq 2729 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |