P. 27 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2601-2700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rexlimiv 2601*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimiva 2602*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimivw 2603*	Weaker version of rexlimiv 2601. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimd 2604	Deduction from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimd2 2605	Version of rexlimd 2604 with deduction version of second hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdv 2606*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 22-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdva 2607*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvaa 2608*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdv3a 2609*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). Frequently-used variant of rexlimdv 2606. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdva2 2610*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvw 2611*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimddv 2612*	Restricted existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	rexlimivv 2613*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimdvv 2614*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvva 2615*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.26 2616	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.27v 2617*	Restricted quantitifer version of one direction of 19.27 1572. (The other direction holds when 𝐴 is inhabited, see r19.27mv 3534.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.28v 2618*	Restricted quantifier version of one direction of 19.28 1574. (The other direction holds when 𝐴 is inhabited, see r19.28mv 3530.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26-2 2619	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26-3 2620	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 3 restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by FL, 22-Nov-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.26m 2621	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with mixed quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	ralbi 2622	Distribute a restricted universal quantifier over a biconditional. Theorem 19.15 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexbi 2623	Distribute a restricted existential quantifier over a biconditional. Theorem 19.18 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantification. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralbiim 2624	Split a biconditional and distribute quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	r19.27av 2625*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when 𝐴 is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.28av 2626*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when 𝐴 is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29 2627	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29r 2628	Variation of Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	ralnex2 2629	Relationship between two restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-May-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	r19.29af2 2630	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2627. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	r19.29af 2631*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2627. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	r19.29an 2632*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2627. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	r19.29a 2633*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2627. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	r19.29d2r 2634	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two restricted quantifiers, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.29vva 2635*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2627, version with two restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	r19.32r 2636	One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.30dc 2637	Restricted quantifier version of 19.30dc 1638. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.32vr 2638*	One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence, as seen at r19.32vdc 2639. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.32vdc 2639*	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, where 𝜑 is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.35-1 2640	Restricted quantifier version of 19.35-1 1635. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.36av 2641*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic, the converse would hold if 𝐴 has at least one element, but in intuitionistic logic, that is not a sufficient condition. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.37 2642	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic the converse would hold if 𝐴 has at least one element, but that is not sufficient in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by FL, 13-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.37av 2643*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.40 2644	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.41 2645	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.41v 2646*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.42v 2647*	Restricted version of Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.43 2648	Restricted version of Theorem 19.43 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.44av 2649*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. The other direction doesn't hold when 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.45av 2650*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when 𝐴 is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralcomf 2651*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexcomf 2652*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralcom 2653*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexcom 2654*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralrot3 2655*	Rotate three restricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	rexcom13 2656*	Swap 1st and 3rd restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexrot4 2657*	Rotate existential restricted quantifiers twice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	ralcom3 2658	A commutative law for restricted quantifiers that swaps the domain of the restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	reean 2659*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reeanv 2660*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	3reeanv 2661*	Rearrange three existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	nfreu1 2662	𝑥 is not free in ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfrmo1 2663	𝑥 is not free in ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfreudxy 2664*	Not-free deduction for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfreuxy 2665*	Not-free for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	rabid 2666	An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rabid2 2667*	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rabbi 2668	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbidva 2740. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabswap 2669	Swap with a membership relation in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	nfrab1 2670	The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfrabxy 2671*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	reubida 2672	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubidva 2673*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubidv 2674*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubiia 2675	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reubii 2676	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmobida 2677	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rmobidva 2678*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rmobidv 2679*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rmobiia 2680	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmobii 2681	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	raleqf 2682	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rexeqf 2683	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	reueq1f 2684	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rmoeq1f 2685	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	raleq 2686*	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rexeq 2687*	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	reueq1 2688*	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rmoeq1 2689*	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	raleqi 2690*	Equality inference for restricted universal qualifier. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	rexeqi 2691*	Equality inference for restricted existential qualifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	raleqdv 2692*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	rexeqdv 2693*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	raleqbi1dv 2694*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	rexeqbi1dv 2695*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reueqd 2696*	Equality deduction for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	rmoeqd 2697*	Equality deduction for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	raleqbidv 2698*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidv 2699*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	raleqbidva 2700*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))