Theorem bnj956 31364

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj956.1	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj956	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem bnj956

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj956.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵)
2		eleq2 2867	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	anbi1d 624	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
4	3	alexbii 1928	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
5		df-rex 3095	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))
6		df-rex 3095	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr4g 306	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))
8	1, 7	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))
9	8	abbidv 2918	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶})
10		df-iun 4712	. 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶}
11		df-iun 4712	. 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶}
12	9, 10, 11	3eqtr4g 2858	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 385  ∀wal 1651   = wceq 1653  ∃wex 1875   ∈ wcel 2157  {cab 2785  ∃wrex 3090  ∪ ciun 4710

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1891  ax-4 1905  ax-5 2006  ax-6 2072  ax-7 2107  ax-9 2166  ax-10 2185  ax-11 2200  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2777

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 386  df-or 875  df-tru 1657  df-ex 1876  df-nf 1880  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2786  df-cleq 2792  df-clel 2795  df-rex 3095  df-iun 4712

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1316  31408  bnj953  31526  bnj1000  31528  bnj966  31531