Theorem cbvexdw 2335

Description: Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvexd 2407 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Avoid ax-13 2371. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvaldw.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvaldw.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)
cbvaldw.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvexdw	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvexdw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvaldw.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
2		cbvaldw.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)
3	2	nfnd 1861	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ 𝜓)
4		cbvaldw.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
5		notbi 318	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒))
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 250	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)))
7	1, 3, 6	cbvaldw 2334	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜒))
8		alnex 1783	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓)
9		alnex 1783	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜒 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦𝜒)
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr3g 312	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦𝜒))
11	10	con4bid 316	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1539  ∃wex 1781  Ⅎwnf 1785

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-gabima  35815  bj-opabco  36064  wl-mo2t  36435