Theorem cbvexdw 2339

Description: Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvexd 2408 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Avoid ax-13 2372. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvaldw.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvaldw.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)
cbvaldw.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvexdw	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvexdw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvaldw.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
2		cbvaldw.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)
3	2	nfnd 1859	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ 𝜓)
4		cbvaldw.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
5		notbi 319	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒))
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 251	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)))
7	1, 3, 6	cbvaldw 2338	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜒))
8		alnex 1782	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓)
9		alnex 1782	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜒 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦𝜒)
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr3g 313	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦𝜒))
11	10	con4bid 317	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1539  ∃wex 1780  Ⅎwnf 1784

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-gabima  36984  bj-opabco  37232  wl-mo2t  37619