Theorem bj-gabima 37637

Description: Generalized class abstraction as a direct image.

TODO: improve the support lemmas elimag 6068 and fvelima 6950 to nonfreeness hypothesis (and for the latter, biconditional). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-gabima.nf	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
bj-gabima.nff	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
bj-gabima.fun	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
bj-gabima.dm	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ dom 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-gabima	⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝐹‘𝑥) ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = (𝐹 “ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))

Proof of Theorem bj-gabima

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-gabima.nf	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
2		nfcvd 2928	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦)
3		vex 3461	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
4	3	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ V)
5		df-rex 3092	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦))
6	5	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦)))
7		eqcom 2772	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦)
8		df-clab 2744	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓)
9	8	bicomi 227	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
10	7, 9	anbi12ci 641	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦))
11	10	exbii 1881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦))
12	11	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑧(𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦)))
13	1	nf5i 2184	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
14		nfcv 2927	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
15	14	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦)
16		bj-gabima.nff	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
17		nfcv 2927	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑧
18	17	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑧)
19	16, 18	nffvd 6897	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑧))
20	15, 19	nfeqd 2937	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧))
21		nfs1v 2194	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓
22	21	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓)
23	20, 22	nfand 1930	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
24		fveq2 6885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
25	24	eqeq2d 2776	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
26		sbequ12r 2290	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓))
27	25, 26	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝜓)))
28	27	a1i 11	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝜓))))
29	13, 23, 28	cbvexdw 2373	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑧(𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝜓)))
30	6, 12, 29	3bitr2rd 311	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦))
31	1, 2, 4, 30	bj-elgab 37636	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ {(𝐹‘𝑥) ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦))
32		bj-gabima.fun	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
33	32	funfnd 6571	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
34		bj-gabima.dm	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ dom 𝐹)
35	33, 34	fvelimabd 6958	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑦))
36	31, 35	bitr4d 285	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ {(𝐹‘𝑥) ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})))
37	36	eqrdv 2763	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝐹‘𝑥) ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = (𝐹 “ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  Ⅎwnf 1816  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2743  Ⅎwnfc 2912  ∃wrex 3091  Vcvv 3457   ⊆ wss 3906  dom cdm 5663   “ cima 5666  Fun wfun 6534  ‘cfv 6540  {bj-cgab 37630

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-fv 6548  df-bj-gab 37631

This theorem is used by: (None)