Theorem cbvexd 2411

Description: Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 2454. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2375. Use the weaker cbvexdw 2340 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvald.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvald.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)
cbvald.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvexd	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvexd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvald.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
2		cbvald.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)
3	2	nfnd 1856	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ 𝜓)
4		cbvald.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
5		notbi 319	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒))
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 251	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)))
7	1, 3, 6	cbvald 2410	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜒))
8		alnex 1778	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓)
9		alnex 1778	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜒 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦𝜒)
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr3g 313	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦𝜒))
11	10	con4bid 317	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1535  ∃wex 1776  Ⅎwnf 1780

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-13 2375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvexdva  2413  dfid3  5586  axrepndlem2  10631  axunnd  10634  axpowndlem2  10636  axpownd  10639  axregndlem2  10641  axinfndlem1  10643  axacndlem4  10648  wl-mo2df  37551  wl-eudf  37553