Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ceqsrexv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsrexv.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsrexv | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rex 3144 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | an12 643 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
3 | 2 | exbii 1844 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
4 | 1, 3 | bitr4i 280 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | eleq1 2900 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
6 | ceqsrexv.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | anbi12d 632 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) |
8 | 7 | ceqsexgv 3646 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) |
9 | 8 | bianabs 544 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ 𝜓)) |
10 | 4, 9 | syl5bb 285 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 = wceq 1533 ∃wex 1776 ∈ wcel 2110 ∃wrex 3139 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1907 ax-6 1966 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-ext 2793 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-ex 1777 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-rex 3144 |
This theorem is referenced by: ceqsrexbv 3649 ceqsrex2v 3650 reuxfrd 3738 f1oiso 7098 creur 11626 creui 11627 deg1ldg 24680 ulm2 24967 iscgra1 26590 reuxfrdf 30249 poimirlem24 34910 eqlkr3 36231 diclspsn 38324 rmxdiophlem 39605 expdiophlem1 39611 expdiophlem2 39612 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |