| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ceqsrexv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsrexv.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsrexv | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-rex 3071 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 2 | an12 645 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 3 | 2 | exbii 1848 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitr4i 278 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 5 | eleq1 2829 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 6 | ceqsrexv.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | anbi12d 632 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| 8 | 7 | ceqsexgv 3654 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| 9 | 8 | bianabs 541 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 10 | 4, 9 | bitrid 283 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1540 ∃wex 1779 ∈ wcel 2108 ∃wrex 3070 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2708 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-tru 1543 df-ex 1780 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-rex 3071 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ceqsrexbv 3656 ceqsrex2v 3658 reuxfrd 3754 f1oiso 7371 creur 12260 creui 12261 deg1ldg 26131 ulm2 26428 iscgra1 28818 reuxfrdf 32510 poimirlem24 37651 eqlkr3 39102 diclspsn 41196 rmxdiophlem 43027 expdiophlem1 43033 expdiophlem2 43034 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |