Theorem eqrrabd 4034

Description: Deduce equality with a restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eqrrabd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
eqrrabd.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqrrabd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem eqrrabd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1947	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		nfcv 2923	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3		nfrab1 3432	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
4		eqrrabd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
5	4	sseld 3930	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
6	5	pm4.71rd 572	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
7		eqrrabd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))
8	7	pm5.32da 590	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	6, 8	bitrd 282	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
10		rabid 3433	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
11	9, 10	bitr4di 292	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}))
12	1, 2, 3, 11	eqrd 3950	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3413   ⊆ wss 3899

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-rab 3414  df-ss 3916

This theorem is used by:  tmachlem-agreeprod  47916  usgrexmpl2nb0  49098  usgrexmpl2nb1  49099  usgrexmpl2nb2  49100  usgrexmpl2nb3  49101  usgrexmpl2nb4  49102  usgrexmpl2nb5  49103