| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 321 of 512) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31525) |
(31526-33048) |
(33049-51158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | pjhtheu 32001* | Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed uniquely into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102. See pjhtheu2 32023 for the uniqueness of 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Definition | df-pjh 32002* | Define the projection function on a Hilbert space, as a mapping from the Hilbert lattice to a function on Hilbert space. Every closed subspace is associated with a unique projection function. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 66, adopted as a definition. (projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴 is the projection of vector 𝐴 onto closed subspace 𝐻. Note that the range of projℎ is the set of all projection operators, so 𝑇 ∈ ran projℎ means that 𝑇 is a projection operator. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ projℎ = (ℎ ∈ Cℋ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℋ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℎ ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘ℎ)𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | pjhfval 32003* | The value of the projection map. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ ℋ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | pjhval 32004* | Value of a projection. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | pjpreeq 32005* | Equality with a projection. This version of pjeq 32006 does not assume the Axiom of Choice via pjhth 32000. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻))) → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | pjeq 32006* | Equality with a projection. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | axpjcl 32007 | Closure of a projection in its subspace. If we consider this together with axpjpj 32027 to be axioms, the need for the ax-hcompl 31809 can often be avoided for the kinds of theorems we are interested in here. An interesting project is to see how far we can go by using them in place of it. In particular, we can prove the orthomodular law pjomli 32042.) (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | pjhcl 32008 | Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | omlsilem 32009 | Lemma for orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 & ⊢ (𝐻 ∩ (⊥‘𝐺)) = 0ℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ (⊥‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | omlsii 32010 | Subspace inference form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | omlsi 32011 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ococi 32012 | Complement of complement of a closed subspace of Hilbert space. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Beran] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ococ 32013 | Complement of complement of a closed subspace of Hilbert space. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Beran] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dfch2 32014 | Alternate definition of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2000.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Cℋ = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℋ ∣ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝑥)) = 𝑥} | ||
| Theorem | ococin 32015* | The double complement is the smallest closed subspace containing a subset of Hilbert space. Remark 3.12(B) of [Beran] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | hsupval2 32016* | Alternate definition of supremum of a subset of the Hilbert lattice. Definition of supremum in Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. We actually define it on any collection of Hilbert space subsets, not just the Hilbert lattice Cℋ, to allow more general theorems. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 ℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | chsupval2 32017* | The value of the supremum of a set of closed subspaces of Hilbert space. Definition of supremum in Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | sshjval2 32018* | Value of join in the set of closed subspaces of Hilbert space Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2000.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | chsupid 32019* | A subspace is the supremum of all smaller subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chsupsn 32020 | Value of supremum of subset of Cℋ on a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝐴}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | shlub 32021 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound (among Hilbert lattice elements) of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | shlubi 32022 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound (among Hilbert lattice elements) of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | pjhtheu2 32023* | Uniqueness of 𝑦 for the projection theorem. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pjcli 32024 | Closure of a projection in its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | pjhcli 32025 | Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | pjpjpre 32026 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. This formulation of axpjpj 32027 avoids pjhth 32000. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | axpjpj 32027 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. See comment in axpjcl 32007. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjclii 32028 | Closure of a projection in its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | pjhclii 32029 | Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ | ||
| Theorem | pjpj0i 32030 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpji 32031 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpjhth 32032* | Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpjhthi 32033* | Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | pjop 32034 | Orthocomplement projection in terms of projection. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjpo 32035 | Projection in terms of orthocomplement projection. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjopi 32036 | Orthocomplement projection in terms of projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpoi 32037 | Projection in terms of orthocomplement projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjoc1i 32038 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | pjchi 32039 | Projection of a vector in the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(ii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pjoccl 32040 | The part of a vector that belongs to the orthocomplemented space. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | pjoc1 32041 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
| Theorem | pjomli 32042 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 32011. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pjoml 32043 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 32011. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pjococi 32044 | Proof of orthocomplement theorem using projections. Compare ococ 32013. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐻)) = 𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | pjoc2i 32045 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | pjoc2 32046 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
| Theorem | sh0le 32047 | The zero subspace is the smallest subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ch0le 32048 | The zero subspace is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | shle0 32049 | No subspace is smaller than the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | chle0 32050 | No Hilbert lattice element is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | chnlen0 32051 | A Hilbert lattice element that is not a subset of another is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | ch0pss 32052 | The zero subspace is a proper subset of nonzero Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (0ℋ ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | orthin 32053 | The intersection of orthogonal subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | ssjo 32054 | The lattice join of a subset with its orthocomplement is the whole space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | shne0i 32055* | A nonzero subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | shs0i 32056 | Hilbert subspace sum with the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | shs00i 32057 | Two subspaces are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | ch0lei 32058 | The closed subspace zero is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chle0i 32059 | No Hilbert closed subspace is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | chne0i 32060* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | chocini 32061 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chj0i 32062 | Join with lattice zero in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chm1i 32063 | Meet with lattice one in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chjcli 32064 | Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | chsleji 32065 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chseli 32066* | Membership in subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | chincli 32067 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | chsscon3i 32068 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon1i 32069 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon2i 32070 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chcon2i 32071 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chcon1i 32072 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chcon3i 32073 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chunssji 32074 | Union is smaller than Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chjcomi 32075 | Commutative law for join in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chub1i 32076 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chub2i 32077 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chlubi 32078 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | chlubii 32079 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements (one direction of chlubi 32078). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | chlej1i 32080 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chlej2i 32081 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chlej12i 32082 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | chlejb1i 32083 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm1i 32084 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm2i 32085 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm3i 32086 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm4i 32087 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj1i 32088 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj2i 32089 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj3i 32090 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj4i 32091 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chnlei 32092 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chjassi 32093 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chj00i 32094 | Two Hilbert lattice elements are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | chjoi 32095 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chj1i 32096 | Join with Hilbert lattice one. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ℋ) = ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chm0i 32097 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chm0 32098 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | shjshsi 32099 | Hilbert lattice join equals the double orthocomplement of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (⊥‘(⊥‘(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | shjshseli 32100 | A closed subspace sum equals Hilbert lattice join. Part of Lemma 31.1.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |