MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ifpsnprss Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ifpsnprss 27406
Description: Lemma for wlkvtxeledg 27407: Two adjacent (not necessarily different) vertices 𝐴 and 𝐵 in a walk are incident with an edge 𝐸. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2021.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ifpsnprss (if-(𝐴 = 𝐵, 𝐸 = {𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐸) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐸)

Proof of Theorem ifpsnprss
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssidd 3992 . . 3 ((𝐴 = 𝐵𝐸 = {𝐴}) → {𝐴} ⊆ {𝐴})
2 preq2 4672 . . . . . 6 (𝐵 = 𝐴 → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐴, 𝐴})
3 dfsn2 4582 . . . . . 6 {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴}
42, 3syl6eqr 2876 . . . . 5 (𝐵 = 𝐴 → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐴})
54eqcoms 2831 . . . 4 (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐴})
65adantr 483 . . 3 ((𝐴 = 𝐵𝐸 = {𝐴}) → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐴})
7 simpr 487 . . 3 ((𝐴 = 𝐵𝐸 = {𝐴}) → 𝐸 = {𝐴})
81, 6, 73sstr4d 4016 . 2 ((𝐴 = 𝐵𝐸 = {𝐴}) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐸)
981fpid3 1075 1 (if-(𝐴 = 𝐵, 𝐸 = {𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐸) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐸)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 398  if-wif 1057   = wceq 1537  wss 3938  {csn 4569  {cpr 4571
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-ifp 1058  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-v 3498  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572
This theorem is referenced by:  wlkvtxeledg  27407
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator