P. 290 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28901-29000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cgrancol 28901	Angle congruence preserves non-colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	dfcgra2 28902*	This is the full statement of definition 11.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. This proof serves to confirm that the definition we have chosen, df-cgra 28880 is indeed equivalent to the textbook's definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑎) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑎) = (𝐸 − 𝐷)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑐) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝑐) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))) ∧ ((𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑑) ∧ (𝐷 − 𝑑) = (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑓) ∧ (𝐹 − 𝑓) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))) ∧ (𝑎 − 𝑐) = (𝑑 − 𝑓)))))
Theorem	sacgr 28903	Supplementary angles of congruent angles are themselves congruent. Theorem 11.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by Igor Ieskov, 16-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑌𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	oacgr 28904	Vertical angle theorem. Vertical, or opposite angles are the facing pair of angles formed when two lines intersect. Eudemus of Rhodes attributed the proof to Thales of Miletus. The proposition showed that since both of a pair of vertical angles are supplementary to both of the adjacent angles, the vertical angles are equal in measure. We follow the same path. Theorem 11.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	acopy 28905*	Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
Theorem	acopyeu 28906	Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. Akin to a uniqueness theorem, this states that if two points 𝑋 and 𝑌 both fulfill the conditions, then they are on the same half-line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑌)
16.2.17  Angle Comparisons
Syntax	cinag 28907	Extend class relation with the geometrical "point in angle" relation.
class inA
Syntax	cleag 28908	Extend class relation with the "angle less than" relation.
class ≤∠
Definition	df-inag 28909*	Definition of the geometrical "in angle" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ inA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑝, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ((𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ (((𝑡‘0) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ (𝑡‘2) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ (𝑡‘1)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥 ∈ ((𝑡‘0)(Itv‘𝑔)(𝑡‘2)) ∧ (𝑥 = (𝑡‘1) ∨ 𝑥((hlG‘𝑔)‘(𝑡‘1))𝑝))))})
Theorem	isinag 28910*	Property for point 𝑋 to lie in the angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩. Definition 11.23 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋)))))
Theorem	isinagd 28911	Sufficient conditions for in-angle relation, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	inagflat 28912	Any point lies in a flat angle. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	inagswap 28913	Swap the order of the half lines delimiting the angle. Theorem 11.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	inagne1 28914	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inagne2 28915	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inagne3 28916	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inaghl 28917	The "point lie in angle" relation is independent of the points chosen on the half lines starting from 𝐵. Theorem 11.25 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐹”⟩)
Definition	df-leag 28918*	Definition of the geometrical "angle less than" relation. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ≤∠ = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥(inA‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)(𝑏‘2)”⟩ ∧ ⟨“(𝑎‘0)(𝑎‘1)(𝑎‘2)”⟩(cgrA‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)𝑥”⟩))})
Theorem	isleag 28919*	Geometrical "less than" property for angles. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑥”⟩)))
Theorem	isleagd 28920	Sufficient condition for "less than" angle relation, deduction version (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	leagne1 28921	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	leagne2 28922	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	leagne3 28923	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)
Theorem	leagne4 28924	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸)
Theorem	cgrg3col4 28925*	Lemma 11.28 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. Extend a congruence of three points with a fourth colinear point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝑋”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹𝑦”⟩)
16.2.18  Congruence Theorems
Theorem	tgsas1 28926	First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then third sides are equal in length. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))
Theorem	tgsas 28927	First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	tgsas2 28928	First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)
Theorem	tgsas3 28929	First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	tgasa1 28930	Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))
Theorem	tgasa 28931	Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	tgsss1 28932	Third congruence theorem: SSS (Side-Side-Side): If the three pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	tgsss2 28933	Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)
Theorem	tgsss3 28934	Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	dfcgrg2 28935	Congruence for two triangles can also be defined as congruence of sides and angles (6 parts). This is often the actual textbook definition of triangle congruence, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#Congruence_of_triangles. With this definition, the "SSS" congruence theorem has an additional part, namely, that triangle congruence implies congruence of the sides (which means equality of the lengths). Because our development of elementary geometry strives to closely follow Schwabhaeuser's, our original definition of shape congruence, df-cgrg 28583, already covers that part: see trgcgr 28588. This theorem is also named "CPCTC", which stands for "Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#CPCTC 28588. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) ∧ (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩))))
Theorem	isoas 28936	Congruence theorem for isocele triangles: if two angles of a triangle are congruent, then the corresponding sides also are. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐵”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − 𝐶))
16.2.19  Equilateral triangles
Syntax	ceqlg 28937	Declare the class of equilateral triangles.
class eqltrG
Definition	df-eqlg 28938*	Define the class of equilateral triangles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ eqltrG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∣ 𝑥(cgrG‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑥‘1)(𝑥‘2)(𝑥‘0)”⟩})
Theorem	iseqlg 28939	Property of a triangle being equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺) ↔ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩))
Theorem	iseqlgd 28940	Condition for a triangle to be equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐶 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺))
16.3  Properties of geometries
16.3.1  Isomorphisms between geometries
Theorem	f1otrgds 28941*	Convenient lemma for f1otrg 28943. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	f1otrgitv 28942*	Convenient lemma for f1otrg 28943. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑍) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑌))))
Theorem	f1otrg 28943*	A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (LineG‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑧))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiG)
Theorem	f1otrge 28944*	A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also the property of being a Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiGE)
16.4  Geometry in Hilbert spaces
Syntax	cttg 28945	Function to convert an algebraic structure to a Tarski geometry.
class toTG
Definition	df-ttg 28946*	Define a function converting a subcomplex Hilbert space to a Tarski Geometry. It does so by equipping the structure with a betweenness operation. Note that because the scalar product is applied over the interval (0[,]1), only spaces whose scalar field is a superset of that interval can be considered. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Mar-2019.)
⊢ toTG = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧(-g‘𝑤)𝑥) = (𝑘( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)(𝑦(-g‘𝑤)𝑥))}) / 𝑖⦌((𝑤 sSet ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝑖⟩) sSet ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})⟩))
Theorem	ttgval 28947*	Define a function to augment a subcomplex Hilbert space with betweenness and a line definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 = ((𝐻 sSet ⟨(Itv‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})⟩) sSet ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})⟩) ∧ 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})))
Theorem	ttglem 28948	Lemma for ttgbas 28949, ttgvsca 28952 etc. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (LineG‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Itv‘ndx)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝐻) = (𝐸‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgbas 28949	The base set of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgplusg 28950	The addition operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgsub 28951	The subtraction operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgvsca 28952	The scalar product of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgds 28953	The metric of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgitvval 28954*	Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑋𝐼𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))})
Theorem	ttgelitv 28955*	Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑍 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))))
Theorem	ttgbtwnid 28956	Any subcomplex module equipped with the betweenness operation fulfills the identity of betweenness (Axiom A6). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	ttgcontlem1 28957	Lemma for % ttgcont . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (𝑀 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0[,]𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝐾 · (𝑌 − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑀 · (𝑁 − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 + (𝐿 · (𝑁 − 𝐴))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))
Theorem	xmstrkgc 28958	Any metric space fulfills Tarski's geometry axioms of congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ ∞MetSp → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC)
16.4.1  Geometry in the complex plane
Theorem	cchhllem 28959*	Lemma for chlbas and chlvsca . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) sSet ⟨(·𝑖‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · (∗‘𝑦)))⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘ℂfld) = (𝐸‘𝐶)
16.4.2  Geometry in Euclidean spaces
16.4.2.1  Definition of the Euclidean space
Syntax	cee 28960	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean space generator.
class 𝔼
Syntax	cbtwn 28961	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean betweenness predicate.
class Btwn
Syntax	ccgr 28962	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean congruence predicate.
class Cgr
Definition	df-ee 28963	Define the Euclidean space generator. For details, see elee 28966. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝔼 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑛)))
Definition	df-btwn 28964*	Define the Euclidean betweenness predicate. For details, see brbtwn 28972. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Btwn = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑧‘𝑖))))}
Definition	df-cgr 28965*	Define the Euclidean congruence predicate. For details, see brcgr 28973. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Cgr = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑥)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑖))↑2))}
Theorem	elee 28966	Membership in a Euclidean space. We define Euclidean space here using Cartesian coordinates over 𝑁 space. We later abstract away from this using Tarski's geometry axioms, so this exact definition is unimportant. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ))
Theorem	mptelee 28967*	A condition for a mapping to be an element of a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by SN, 2-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	mpteleeOLD 28968*	Obsolete version of mptelee 28967 as of 2-Feb-2026. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	eleenn 28969	If 𝐴 is in (𝔼‘𝑁), then 𝑁 is a natural. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eleei 28970	The forward direction of elee 28966. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	eedimeq 28971	A point belongs to at most one Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀)) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)
Theorem	brbtwn 28972*	The binary relation form of the betweenness predicate. The statement 𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ should be informally read as "𝐴 lies on a line segment between 𝐵 and 𝐶. This exact definition is abstracted away by Tarski's geometry axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐵‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝐶‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	brcgr 28973*	The binary relation form of the congruence predicate. The statement ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ should be read informally as "the 𝑁 dimensional point 𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐶 is from 𝐷, or "the line segment 𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the line segment 𝐶𝐷. This particular definition is encapsulated by Tarski's axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))
Theorem	fveere 28974	The function value of a point is a real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	fveecn 28975	The function value of a point is a complex. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eqeefv 28976*	Two points are equal iff they agree in all dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (𝐵‘𝑖)))
Theorem	eqeelen 28977*	Two points are equal iff the square of the distance between them is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = 0))
Theorem	brbtwn2 28978*	Alternate characterization of betweenness, with no existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))))))
Theorem	colinearalglem1 28979	Lemma for colinearalg 28983. Expand out a multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐹 − 𝐷)) = ((𝐸 − 𝐷) · (𝐶 − 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝐵 · 𝐹) − ((𝐴 · 𝐹) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))) = ((𝐶 · 𝐸) − ((𝐴 · 𝐸) + (𝐶 · 𝐷)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem2 28980*	Lemma for colinearalg 28983. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)) · ((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))) = (((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗)) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem3 28981*	Lemma for colinearalg 28983. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · ((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))) = (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) · ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem4 28982*	Lemma for colinearalg 28983. Prove a disjunction that will be needed in the final proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)((((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖))) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · (((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐶‘𝑖))) ≤ 0))
Theorem	colinearalg 28983*	An algebraic characterization of colinearity. Note the similarity to brbtwn2 28978. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ((𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	eleesub 28984*	Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	eleesubd 28985*	Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. Deduction form of eleesub 28984. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
16.4.2.2  Tarski's axioms for geometry for the Euclidean space
Theorem	axdimuniq 28986	The unique dimension axiom. If a point is in 𝑁 dimensional space and in 𝑀 dimensional space, then 𝑁 = 𝑀. This axiom is not traditionally presented with Tarski's axioms, but we require it here as we are considering spaces in arbitrary dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀))) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)
Theorem	axcgrrflx 28987	𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐵 is from 𝐴. Axiom A1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩)
Theorem	axcgrtr 28988	Congruence is transitive. Axiom A2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	axcgrid 28989	If there is no distance between 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 = 𝐵. Axiom A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐶⟩ → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	axsegconlem1 28990*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Handle the degenerate case. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)(∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑥‘𝑖))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝑥‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))
Theorem	axsegconlem2 28991*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that the square of the distance between two points is a real number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axsegconlem3 28992*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that the square of the distance between two points is nonnegative. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 0 ≤ 𝑆)
Theorem	axsegconlem4 28993*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that the distance between two points is a real number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (√‘𝑆) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axsegconlem5 28994*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that the distance between two points is nonnegative. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 0 ≤ (√‘𝑆))
Theorem	axsegconlem6 28995*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that the distance between two distinct points is positive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 0 < (√‘𝑆))
Theorem	axsegconlem7 28996*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that a particular ratio of distances is in the closed unit interval. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇))) ∈ (0[,]1))
Theorem	axsegconlem8 28997*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that a particular mapping generates a point. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	axsegconlem9 28998*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that 𝐵𝐹 is congruent to 𝐶𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐹‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2))
Theorem	axsegconlem10 28999*	Lemma for axsegcon 29000. Show that the scaling constant from axsegconlem7 28996 produces the betweenness condition for 𝐴, 𝐵 and 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − ((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)))) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇))) · (𝐹‘𝑖))))
Theorem	axsegcon 29000*	Any segment 𝐴𝐵 can be extended to a point 𝑥 such that 𝐵𝑥 is congruent to 𝐶𝐷. Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩))