P. 290 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28901-29000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	outpasch 28901*	Axiom of Pasch, outer form. This was proven by Gupta from other axioms and is therefore presented as Theorem 9.6 in [Schwabhauser] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑥)))
Theorem	hlpasch 28902*	An application of the axiom of Pasch for half-lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑒 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐷)))
Syntax	chpg 28903	"Belong to the same open half-plane" relation for points in a geometry.
class hpG
Definition	df-hpg 28904*	Define the open half plane relation for a geometry 𝐺. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. See hpgbr 28906 to find the same formulation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ hpG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑏𝑖𝑐)))}))
Theorem	ishpg 28905*	Value of the half-plane relation for a given line 𝐷. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑂𝑐)})
Theorem	hpgbr 28906*	Half-planes : property for points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to belong to the same open half plane delimited by line 𝐷. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐)))
Theorem	hpgne1 28907*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	hpgne2 28908*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	lnopp2hpgb 28909*	Theorem 9.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵𝑂𝐶 ↔ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵))
Theorem	lnoppnhpg 28910*	If two points lie on the opposite side of a line 𝐷, they are not on the same half-plane. Theorem 9.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)
Theorem	hpgerlem 28911*	Lemma for the proof that the half-plane relation is an equivalence relation. Lemma 9.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴𝑂𝑐)
Theorem	hpgid 28912*	The half-plane relation is reflexive. Theorem 9.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgcom 28913*	The half-plane relation commutes. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgtr 28914*	The half-plane relation is transitive. Theorem 9.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
Theorem	colopp 28915*	Opposite sides of a line for colinear points. Theorem 9.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	colhp 28916*	Half-plane relation for colinear points. Theorem 9.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	hphl 28917*	If two points are on the same half-line with endpoint on a line, they are on the same half-plane defined by this line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
16.2.15  Midpoints and Line Mirroring
Syntax	cmid 28918	Declare the constant for the midpoint operation.
class midG
Syntax	clmi 28919	Declare the constant for the line mirroring function.
class lInvG
Definition	df-mid 28920*	Define the midpoint operation. Definition 10.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. See ismidb 28924, midbtwn 28925, and midcgr 28926. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ midG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑚 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)𝑏 = (((pInvG‘𝑔)‘𝑚)‘𝑎))))
Definition	df-lmi 28921*	Define the line mirroring function. Definition 10.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. See islmib 28933. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ lInvG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)((𝑎(midG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∈ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑚(⟂G‘𝑔)(𝑎(LineG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏))))))
Theorem	midf 28922	Midpoint as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (midG‘𝐺):(𝑃 × 𝑃)⟶𝑃)
Theorem	midcl 28923	Closure of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	ismidb 28924	Property of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝑀))
Theorem	midbtwn 28925	Betweenness of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))
Theorem	midcgr 28926	Congruence of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	midid 28927	Midpoint of a null segment. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	midcom 28928	Commutativity rule for the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐵(midG‘𝐺)𝐴))
Theorem	mirmid 28929	Point inversion preserves midpoints. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)(midG‘𝐺)(𝑆‘𝐵)) = (𝑆‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵)))
Theorem	lmieu 28930*	Uniqueness of the line mirror point. Theorem 10.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝑏) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑏) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑏)))
Theorem	lmif 28931	Line mirror as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃⟶𝑃)
Theorem	lmicl 28932	Closure of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	islmib 28933	Property of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ↔ ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	lmicom 28934	The line mirroring function is an involution. Theorem 10.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmilmi 28935	Line mirroring is an involution. Theorem 10.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmireu 28936*	Any point has a unique antecedent through line mirroring. Theorem 10.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑀‘𝑏) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmieq 28937	Equality deduction for line mirroring. Theorem 10.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = (𝑀‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	lmiinv 28938	The invariants of the line mirroring lie on the mirror line. Theorem 10.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	lmicinv 28939	The mirroring line is an invariant. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmimid 28940	If we have a right angle, then the mirror point is the point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) = (𝑆‘𝐶))
Theorem	lmif1o 28941	The line mirroring function 𝑀 is a bijection. Theorem 10.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	lmiisolem 28942	Lemma for lmiiso 28943. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐴))(midG‘𝐺)(𝐵(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmiiso 28943	The line mirroring function is an isometry, i.e. it is conserves congruence. Because it is also a bijection, it is also a motion. Theorem 10.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmimot 28944	Line mirroring is a motion of the geometric space. Theorem 10.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 90. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	hypcgrlem1 28945	Lemma for hypcgr 28947, case where triangles share a cathetus. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐷)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgrlem2 28946	Lemma for hypcgr 28947, case where triangles share one vertex 𝐵. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐶(midG‘𝐺)𝐹)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgr 28947	If the catheti of two right-angled triangles are congruent, so is their hypothenuse. Theorem 10.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 91. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	lmiopp 28948*	Line mirroring produces points on the opposite side of the mirroring line. Theorem 10.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂(𝑀‘𝐴))
Theorem	lnperpex 28949*	Existence of a perpendicular to a line 𝐿 at a given point 𝐴. Theorem 10.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑝𝐿𝐴) ∧ 𝑝((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝑄))
Theorem	trgcopy 28950*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: existence part. First part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
Theorem	trgcopyeulem 28951*	Lemma for trgcopyeu 28952. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸))) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	trgcopyeu 28952*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: uniqueness part. Second part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
16.2.16  Congruence of angles
Syntax	ccgra 28953	Declare the constant for the congruence between angles relation.
class cgrA
Definition	df-cgra 28954*	Define the congruence relation between angles. As for triangles we use "words of points". See iscgra 28955 for a more human readable version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2020.)
⊢ cgrA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(hlG‘𝑔) / 𝑘]((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑎(cgrG‘𝑔)⟨“𝑥(𝑏‘1)𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘0) ∧ 𝑦(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘2)))})
Theorem	iscgra 28955*	Property for two angles ABC and DEF to be congruent. This is a modified version of the definition 11.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. where the number of constructed points has been reduced to two. We chose this version rather than the textbook version because it is shorter and therefore simpler to work with. Theorem dfcgra2 28976 shows that those definitions are indeed equivalent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑥𝐸𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷 ∧ 𝑦(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgra1 28956*	A special version of iscgra 28955 where one distance is known to be equal. In this case, angle congruence can be written with only one quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑥”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgrad 28957	Sufficient conditions for angle congruence, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgrane1 28958	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	cgrane2 28959	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	cgrane3 28960	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	cgrane4 28961	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)
Theorem	cgrahl1 28962	Angle congruence is independent of the choice of points on the rays. Proposition 11.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgrahl2 28963	Angle congruence is independent of the choice of points on the rays. Proposition 11.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)
Theorem	cgracgr 28964	First direction of proposition 11.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. Again, this is "half" of the proposition, i.e. only two additional points are used, while Schwabhauser has four. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝑋) = (𝐸 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	cgraid 28965	Angle congruence is reflexive. Theorem 11.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	cgraswap 28966	Swap rays in a congruence relation. Theorem 11.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	cgrcgra 28967	Triangle congruence implies angle congruence. This is a portion of CPCTC, focusing on a specific angle. (Contributed by Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgracom 28968	Angle congruence commutes. Theorem 11.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	cgratr 28969	Angle congruence is transitive. Theorem 11.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)
Theorem	flatcgra 28970	Flat angles are congruent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgraswaplr 28971	Swap both side of angle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐸𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	cgrabtwn 28972	Angle congruence preserves flat angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))
Theorem	cgrahl 28973	Angle congruence preserves null angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)
Theorem	cgracol 28974	Angle congruence preserves colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	cgrancol 28975	Angle congruence preserves non-colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	dfcgra2 28976*	This is the full statement of definition 11.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. This proof serves to confirm that the definition we have chosen, df-cgra 28954 is indeed equivalent to the textbook's definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑎) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑎) = (𝐸 − 𝐷)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑐) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝑐) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))) ∧ ((𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑑) ∧ (𝐷 − 𝑑) = (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑓) ∧ (𝐹 − 𝑓) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))) ∧ (𝑎 − 𝑐) = (𝑑 − 𝑓)))))
Theorem	sacgr 28977	Supplementary angles of congruent angles are themselves congruent. Theorem 11.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by Igor Ieskov, 16-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑌𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	oacgr 28978	Vertical angle theorem. Vertical, or opposite angles are the facing pair of angles formed when two lines intersect. Eudemus of Rhodes attributed the proof to Thales of Miletus. The proposition showed that since both of a pair of vertical angles are supplementary to both of the adjacent angles, the vertical angles are equal in measure. We follow the same path. Theorem 11.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	acopy 28979*	Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
Theorem	acopyeu 28980	Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. Akin to a uniqueness theorem, this states that if two points 𝑋 and 𝑌 both fulfill the conditions, then they are on the same half-line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑌)
16.2.17  Angle Comparisons
Syntax	cinag 28981	Extend class relation with the geometrical "point in angle" relation.
class inA
Syntax	cleag 28982	Extend class relation with the "angle less than" relation.
class ≤∠
Definition	df-inag 28983*	Definition of the geometrical "in angle" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ inA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑝, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ((𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ (((𝑡‘0) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ (𝑡‘2) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ (𝑡‘1)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥 ∈ ((𝑡‘0)(Itv‘𝑔)(𝑡‘2)) ∧ (𝑥 = (𝑡‘1) ∨ 𝑥((hlG‘𝑔)‘(𝑡‘1))𝑝))))})
Theorem	isinag 28984*	Property for point 𝑋 to lie in the angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩. Definition 11.23 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋)))))
Theorem	isinagd 28985	Sufficient conditions for in-angle relation, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	inagflat 28986	Any point lies in a flat angle. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	inagswap 28987	Swap the order of the half lines delimiting the angle. Theorem 11.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	inagne1 28988	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inagne2 28989	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inagne3 28990	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inaghl 28991	The "point lie in angle" relation is independent of the points chosen on the half lines starting from 𝐵. Theorem 11.25 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐹”⟩)
Definition	df-leag 28992*	Definition of the geometrical "angle less than" relation. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ≤∠ = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥(inA‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)(𝑏‘2)”⟩ ∧ ⟨“(𝑎‘0)(𝑎‘1)(𝑎‘2)”⟩(cgrA‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)𝑥”⟩))})
Theorem	isleag 28993*	Geometrical "less than" property for angles. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑥”⟩)))
Theorem	isleagd 28994	Sufficient condition for "less than" angle relation, deduction version (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	leagne1 28995	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	leagne2 28996	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	leagne3 28997	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)
Theorem	leagne4 28998	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸)
Theorem	cgrg3col4 28999*	Lemma 11.28 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. Extend a congruence of three points with a fourth colinear point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝑋”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹𝑦”⟩)
16.2.18  Congruence Theorems
Theorem	tgsas1 29000	First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then third sides are equal in length. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))