P. 290 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28901-29000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	miriso 28901	The point inversion function is an isometry, i.e. it is conserves congruence. Because it is also a bijection, it is also a motion. Theorem 7.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 50. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝑋) − (𝑀‘𝑌)) = (𝑋 − 𝑌))
Theorem	mirbtwni 28902	Point inversion preserves betweenness, first half of Theorem 7.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 51. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝑌) ∈ ((𝑀‘𝑋)𝐼(𝑀‘𝑍)))
Theorem	mirbtwnb 28903	Point inversion preserves betweenness. Theorem 7.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 51. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ↔ (𝑀‘𝑌) ∈ ((𝑀‘𝑋)𝐼(𝑀‘𝑍))))
Theorem	mircgrs 28904	Point inversion preserves congruence. Theorem 7.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 51. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑍 − 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝑋) − (𝑀‘𝑌)) = ((𝑀‘𝑍) − (𝑀‘𝑇)))
Theorem	mirmir2 28905	Point inversion of a point inversion through another point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘((𝑆‘𝑌)‘𝑋)) = ((𝑆‘(𝑀‘𝑌))‘(𝑀‘𝑋)))
Theorem	mirmot 28906	Point investion is a motion of the geometric space. Theorem 7.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 51. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	mirln 28907	If two points are on the same line, so is the mirror point of one through the other. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	mirln2 28908	If a point and its mirror point are both on the same line, so is the center of the point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	mirconn 28909	Point inversion of connectedness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑋)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼(𝑀‘𝑌)))
Theorem	mirhl 28910	If two points 𝑋 and 𝑌 are on the same half-line from 𝑍, the same applies to the mirror points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝑍)𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝑋)(𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝑍))(𝑀‘𝑌))
Theorem	mirbtwnhl 28911	If the center of the point inversion 𝐴 is between two points 𝑋 and 𝑌, then the half lines are mirrored. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(𝐾‘𝐴)𝑋 ↔ (𝑀‘𝑍)(𝐾‘𝐴)𝑌))
Theorem	mirhl2 28912	Deduce half-line relation from mirror point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼(𝑀‘𝑌)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐴)𝑌)
Theorem	mircgrextend 28913	Link congruence over a pair of mirror points. cf tgcgrextend 28712. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝑋 − 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐴)) = (𝑋 − (𝑁‘𝑋)))
Theorem	mirtrcgr 28914	Point inversion of one point of a triangle around another point preserves triangle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“(𝑀‘𝐴)𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∼ ⟨“(𝑁‘𝑋)𝑌𝑍”⟩)
Theorem	mirauto 28915	Point inversion preserves point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑀‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑀‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝑋)‘𝑌) = 𝑍)
Theorem	miduniq 28916	Uniqueness of the middle point, expressed with point inversion. Theorem 7.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 51. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝑋) = 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	miduniq1 28917	Uniqueness of the middle point, expressed with point inversion. Theorem 7.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 52. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = ((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	miduniq2 28918	If two point inversions commute, they are identical. Theorem 7.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 52. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)‘((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝑋)) = ((𝑆‘𝐵)‘((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑋)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	colmid 28919	Colinearity and equidistance implies midpoint. Theorem 7.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 52. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑋 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	symquadlem 28920	Lemma of the symmetrical quadrilateral. The diagonals of quadrilaterals with congruent opposing sides intersect at their middle point. In Euclidean geometry, such quadrilaterals are called parallelograms, as opposing sides are parallel. However, this is not necessarily true in the case of absolute geometry. Lemma 7.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 52. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑀‘𝐶))
Theorem	krippenlem 28921	Lemma for krippen 28922. We can assume krippen.7 "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐸) = (𝐶 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑁‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))
Theorem	krippen 28922	Krippenlemma (German for crib's lemma) Lemma 7.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 53. proven by Gupta 1965 as Theorem 3.45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐸) = (𝐶 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑁‘𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))
Theorem	midexlem 28923*	Lemma for the existence of a middle point. Lemma 7.25 of [Schwabhauser] p. 55. This proof of the existence of a midpoint requires the existence of a third point 𝐶 equidistant to 𝐴 and 𝐵 This condition will be removed later. Because the operation notation (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) for a midpoint implies its uniqueness, it cannot be used until uniqueness is proven, and until then, an equivalent mirror point notation 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) has to be used. See mideu 28969 for the existence and uniqueness of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴))
16.2.13  Right angles
Syntax	crag 28924	Declare the constant for the class of right angles.
class ∟G
Definition	df-rag 28925*	Define the class of right angles. Definition 8.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 57. See israg 28928. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ∟G = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ Word (Base‘𝑔) ∣ ((♯‘𝑤) = 3 ∧ ((𝑤‘0)(dist‘𝑔)(𝑤‘2)) = ((𝑤‘0)(dist‘𝑔)(((pInvG‘𝑔)‘(𝑤‘1))‘(𝑤‘2))))})
Syntax	cperpg 28926	Declare the constant for the perpendicular relation.
class ⟂G
Definition	df-perpg 28927*	Define the "perpendicular" relation. Definition 8.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. See isperp 28943. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ⟂G = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝑔))})
Theorem	israg 28928	Property for 3 points A, B, C to form a right angle. Definition 8.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 57. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐴 − ((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝐶))))
Theorem	ragcom 28929	Commutative rule for right angles. Theorem 8.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 57. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	ragcol 28930	The right angle property is independent of the choice of point on one side. Theorem 8.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	ragmir 28931	Right angle property is preserved by point inversion. Theorem 8.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝐶)”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	mirrag 28932	Right angle is conserved by point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“(𝑀‘𝐴)(𝑀‘𝐵)(𝑀‘𝐶)”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	ragtrivb 28933	Trivial right angle. Theorem 8.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐵”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	ragflat2 28934	Deduce equality from two right angles. Theorem 8.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	ragflat 28935	Deduce equality from two right angles. Theorem 8.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐵”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	ragtriva 28936	Trivial right angle. Theorem 8.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐴”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ragflat3 28937	Right angle and colinearity. Theorem 8.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ragcgr 28938	Right angle and colinearity. Theorem 8.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	motrag 28939	Right angles are preserved by motions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“(𝐹‘𝐴)(𝐹‘𝐵)(𝐹‘𝐶)”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	ragncol 28940	Right angle implies non-colinearity. A consequence of theorem 8.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	perpln1 28941	Derive a line from perpendicularity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)
Theorem	perpln2 28942	Derive a line from perpendicularity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)
Theorem	isperp 28943*	Property for 2 lines A, B to be perpendicular. Item (ii) of definition 8.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)))
Theorem	perpcom 28944	The "perpendicular" relation commutes. Theorem 8.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	perpneq 28945	Two perpendicular lines are different. Theorem 8.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	isperp2 28946*	Property for 2 lines A, B, intersecting at a point X to be perpendicular. Item (i) of definition 8.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ⟨“𝑢𝑋𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)))
Theorem	isperp2d 28947	One direction of isperp2 28946. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑈𝑋𝑉”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	ragperp 28948	Deduce that two lines are perpendicular from a right angle statement. One direction of theorem 8.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑈𝑋𝑉”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)
Theorem	footexALT 28949*	Alternative version of footex 28952 which minimization requires a notably long time. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footexlem1 28950	Lemma for footex 28952. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	footexlem2 28951	Lemma for footex 28952. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐿𝑋)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footex 28952*	From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. This point is unique, see foot 28953. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	foot 28953*	From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a unique point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. That point is called the foot from 𝐶 on 𝐴. Theorem 8.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 60. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footne 28954	Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	footeq 28955	Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	hlperpnel 28956	A point on a half-line which is perpendicular to a line cannot be on that line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑈𝐿𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑈)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	perprag 28957	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	perpdragALT 28958	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	perpdrag 28959	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	colperp 28960	Deduce a perpendicularity from perpendicularity and colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐶)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷)
Theorem	colperpexlem1 28961	Lemma for colperp 28960. First part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐴𝑄”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	colperpexlem2 28962	Lemma for colperpex 28964. Second part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑄)
Theorem	colperpexlem3 28963*	Lemma for colperpex 28964. Case 1 of theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝))))
Theorem	colperpex 28964*	In dimension 2 and above, on a line (𝐴𝐿𝐵) there is always a perpendicular 𝑃 from 𝐴 on a given plane (here given by 𝐶, in case 𝐶 does not lie on the line). Theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝))))
Theorem	mideulem2 28965	Lemma for opphllem 28966, which is itself used for mideu 28969. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇𝐼𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑂)𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑀)
Theorem	opphllem 28966*	Lemma 8.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 66. This is used later for mideulem 28967 and later for opphl 28985. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑂 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝑅)))
Theorem	mideulem 28967*	Lemma for mideu 28969. We can assume mideulem.9 "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝐵 − 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	midex 28968*	Existence of the midpoint, part Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. Note that this proof requires a construction in 2 dimensions or more, i.e. it does not prove the existence of a midpoint in dimension 1, for a geometry restricted to a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	mideu 28969*	Existence and uniqueness of the midpoint, Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
16.2.14  Half-planes
Theorem	islnopp 28970*	The property for two points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to lie on the opposite sides of a set 𝐷 Definition 9.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))))
Theorem	islnoppd 28971*	Deduce that 𝐴 and 𝐵 lie on opposite sides of line 𝐿. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)
Theorem	oppne1 28972*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne2 28973*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne3 28974*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	oppcom 28975*	Commutativity rule for "opposite" Theorem 9.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opptgdim2 28976*	If two points opposite to a line exist, dimension must be 2 or more. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)
Theorem	oppnid 28977*	The "opposite to a line" relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opphllem1 28978*	Lemma for opphl 28985. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem2 28979*	Lemma for opphl 28985. Lemma 9.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem3 28980*	Lemma for opphl 28985: We assume opphllem3.l "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	opphllem4 28981*	Lemma for opphl 28985. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem5 28982*	Second part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem6 28983*	First part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	oppperpex 28984*	Restating colperpex 28964 using the "opposite side of a line" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷 ∧ 𝐶𝑂𝑝))
Theorem	opphl 28985*	If two points 𝐴 and 𝐶 lie on opposite sides of a line 𝐷, then any point of the half line (𝑅𝐴) also lies opposite to 𝐶. Theorem 9.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	outpasch 28986*	Axiom of Pasch, outer form. This was proven by Gupta from other axioms and is therefore presented as Theorem 9.6 in [Schwabhauser] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑥)))
Theorem	hlpasch 28987*	An application of the axiom of Pasch for half-lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑒 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐷)))
Syntax	chpg 28988	"Belong to the same open half-plane" relation for points in a geometry.
class hpG
Definition	df-hpg 28989*	Define the open half plane relation for a geometry 𝐺. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. See hpgbr 28991 to find the same formulation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ hpG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑏𝑖𝑐)))}))
Theorem	ishpg 28990*	Value of the half-plane relation for a given line 𝐷. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑂𝑐)})
Theorem	hpgbr 28991*	Half-planes : property for points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to belong to the same open half plane delimited by line 𝐷. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐)))
Theorem	hpgne1 28992*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	hpgne2 28993*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	lnopp2hpgb 28994*	Theorem 9.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵𝑂𝐶 ↔ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵))
Theorem	lnoppnhpg 28995*	If two points lie on the opposite side of a line 𝐷, they are not on the same half-plane. Theorem 9.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)
Theorem	hpgerlem 28996*	Lemma for the proof that the half-plane relation is an equivalence relation. Lemma 9.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴𝑂𝑐)
Theorem	hpgid 28997*	The half-plane relation is reflexive. Theorem 9.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgcom 28998*	The half-plane relation commutes. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgtr 28999*	The half-plane relation is transitive. Theorem 9.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
Theorem	colopp 29000*	Opposite sides of a line for colinear points. Theorem 9.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)))