P. 290 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28901-29000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cgraid 28901	Angle congruence is reflexive. Theorem 11.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	cgraswap 28902	Swap rays in a congruence relation. Theorem 11.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	cgrcgra 28903	Triangle congruence implies angle congruence. This is a portion of CPCTC, focusing on a specific angle. (Contributed by Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgracom 28904	Angle congruence commutes. Theorem 11.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	cgratr 28905	Angle congruence is transitive. Theorem 11.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)
Theorem	flatcgra 28906	Flat angles are congruent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgraswaplr 28907	Swap both side of angle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐸𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	cgrabtwn 28908	Angle congruence preserves flat angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))
Theorem	cgrahl 28909	Angle congruence preserves null angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)
Theorem	cgracol 28910	Angle congruence preserves colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	cgrancol 28911	Angle congruence preserves non-colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	dfcgra2 28912*	This is the full statement of definition 11.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. This proof serves to confirm that the definition we have chosen, df-cgra 28890 is indeed equivalent to the textbook's definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑎) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑎) = (𝐸 − 𝐷)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑐) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝑐) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))) ∧ ((𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑑) ∧ (𝐷 − 𝑑) = (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑓) ∧ (𝐹 − 𝑓) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))) ∧ (𝑎 − 𝑐) = (𝑑 − 𝑓)))))
Theorem	sacgr 28913	Supplementary angles of congruent angles are themselves congruent. Theorem 11.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by Igor Ieskov, 16-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑌𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	oacgr 28914	Vertical angle theorem. Vertical, or opposite angles are the facing pair of angles formed when two lines intersect. Eudemus of Rhodes attributed the proof to Thales of Miletus. The proposition showed that since both of a pair of vertical angles are supplementary to both of the adjacent angles, the vertical angles are equal in measure. We follow the same path. Theorem 11.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	acopy 28915*	Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
Theorem	acopyeu 28916	Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. Akin to a uniqueness theorem, this states that if two points 𝑋 and 𝑌 both fulfill the conditions, then they are on the same half-line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑌)
16.2.17  Angle Comparisons
Syntax	cinag 28917	Extend class relation with the geometrical "point in angle" relation.
class inA
Syntax	cleag 28918	Extend class relation with the "angle less than" relation.
class ≤∠
Definition	df-inag 28919*	Definition of the geometrical "in angle" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ inA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑝, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ((𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ (((𝑡‘0) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ (𝑡‘2) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ (𝑡‘1)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥 ∈ ((𝑡‘0)(Itv‘𝑔)(𝑡‘2)) ∧ (𝑥 = (𝑡‘1) ∨ 𝑥((hlG‘𝑔)‘(𝑡‘1))𝑝))))})
Theorem	isinag 28920*	Property for point 𝑋 to lie in the angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩. Definition 11.23 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋)))))
Theorem	isinagd 28921	Sufficient conditions for in-angle relation, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	inagflat 28922	Any point lies in a flat angle. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	inagswap 28923	Swap the order of the half lines delimiting the angle. Theorem 11.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	inagne1 28924	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inagne2 28925	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inagne3 28926	Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	inaghl 28927	The "point lie in angle" relation is independent of the points chosen on the half lines starting from 𝐵. Theorem 11.25 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐹”⟩)
Definition	df-leag 28928*	Definition of the geometrical "angle less than" relation. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ≤∠ = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥(inA‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)(𝑏‘2)”⟩ ∧ ⟨“(𝑎‘0)(𝑎‘1)(𝑎‘2)”⟩(cgrA‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)𝑥”⟩))})
Theorem	isleag 28929*	Geometrical "less than" property for angles. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑥”⟩)))
Theorem	isleagd 28930	Sufficient condition for "less than" angle relation, deduction version (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	leagne1 28931	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	leagne2 28932	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	leagne3 28933	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)
Theorem	leagne4 28934	Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸)
Theorem	cgrg3col4 28935*	Lemma 11.28 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. Extend a congruence of three points with a fourth colinear point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝑋”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹𝑦”⟩)
16.2.18  Congruence Theorems
Theorem	tgsas1 28936	First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then third sides are equal in length. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))
Theorem	tgsas 28937	First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	tgsas2 28938	First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)
Theorem	tgsas3 28939	First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	tgasa1 28940	Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))
Theorem	tgasa 28941	Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	tgsss1 28942	Third congruence theorem: SSS (Side-Side-Side): If the three pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	tgsss2 28943	Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩)
Theorem	tgsss3 28944	Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	dfcgrg2 28945	Congruence for two triangles can also be defined as congruence of sides and angles (6 parts). This is often the actual textbook definition of triangle congruence, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#Congruence_of_triangles. With this definition, the "SSS" congruence theorem has an additional part, namely, that triangle congruence implies congruence of the sides (which means equality of the lengths). Because our development of elementary geometry strives to closely follow Schwabhaeuser's, our original definition of shape congruence, df-cgrg 28593, already covers that part: see trgcgr 28598. This theorem is also named "CPCTC", which stands for "Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#CPCTC 28598. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) ∧ (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩))))
Theorem	isoas 28946	Congruence theorem for isocele triangles: if two angles of a triangle are congruent, then the corresponding sides also are. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐵”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − 𝐶))
16.2.19  Equilateral triangles
Syntax	ceqlg 28947	Declare the class of equilateral triangles.
class eqltrG
Definition	df-eqlg 28948*	Define the class of equilateral triangles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ eqltrG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∣ 𝑥(cgrG‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑥‘1)(𝑥‘2)(𝑥‘0)”⟩})
Theorem	iseqlg 28949	Property of a triangle being equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺) ↔ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩))
Theorem	iseqlgd 28950	Condition for a triangle to be equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐶 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺))
16.3  Properties of geometries
16.3.1  Isomorphisms between geometries
Theorem	f1otrgds 28951*	Convenient lemma for f1otrg 28953. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	f1otrgitv 28952*	Convenient lemma for f1otrg 28953. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑍) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑌))))
Theorem	f1otrg 28953*	A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (LineG‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑧))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiG)
Theorem	f1otrge 28954*	A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also the property of being a Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiGE)
16.4  Geometry in Hilbert spaces
Syntax	cttg 28955	Function to convert an algebraic structure to a Tarski geometry.
class toTG
Definition	df-ttg 28956*	Define a function converting a subcomplex Hilbert space to a Tarski Geometry. It does so by equipping the structure with a betweenness operation. Note that because the scalar product is applied over the interval (0[,]1), only spaces whose scalar field is a superset of that interval can be considered. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Mar-2019.)
⊢ toTG = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧(-g‘𝑤)𝑥) = (𝑘( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)(𝑦(-g‘𝑤)𝑥))}) / 𝑖⦌((𝑤 sSet ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝑖⟩) sSet ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})⟩))
Theorem	ttgval 28957*	Define a function to augment a subcomplex Hilbert space with betweenness and a line definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 = ((𝐻 sSet ⟨(Itv‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})⟩) sSet ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})⟩) ∧ 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})))
Theorem	ttglem 28958	Lemma for ttgbas 28959, ttgvsca 28962 etc. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (LineG‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Itv‘ndx)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝐻) = (𝐸‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgbas 28959	The base set of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgplusg 28960	The addition operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgsub 28961	The subtraction operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgvsca 28962	The scalar product of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgds 28963	The metric of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgitvval 28964*	Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑋𝐼𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))})
Theorem	ttgelitv 28965*	Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑍 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))))
Theorem	ttgbtwnid 28966	Any subcomplex module equipped with the betweenness operation fulfills the identity of betweenness (Axiom A6). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	ttgcontlem1 28967	Lemma for % ttgcont . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (𝑀 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0[,]𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝐾 · (𝑌 − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑀 · (𝑁 − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 + (𝐿 · (𝑁 − 𝐴))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))
Theorem	xmstrkgc 28968	Any metric space fulfills Tarski's geometry axioms of congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ ∞MetSp → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC)
16.4.1  Geometry in the complex plane
Theorem	cchhllem 28969*	Lemma for chlbas and chlvsca . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) sSet ⟨(·𝑖‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · (∗‘𝑦)))⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘ℂfld) = (𝐸‘𝐶)
16.4.2  Geometry in Euclidean spaces
16.4.2.1  Definition of the Euclidean space
Syntax	cee 28970	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean space generator.
class 𝔼
Syntax	cbtwn 28971	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean betweenness predicate.
class Btwn
Syntax	ccgr 28972	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean congruence predicate.
class Cgr
Definition	df-ee 28973	Define the Euclidean space generator. For details, see elee 28976. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝔼 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑛)))
Definition	df-btwn 28974*	Define the Euclidean betweenness predicate. For details, see brbtwn 28982. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Btwn = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑧‘𝑖))))}
Definition	df-cgr 28975*	Define the Euclidean congruence predicate. For details, see brcgr 28983. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Cgr = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑥)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑖))↑2))}
Theorem	elee 28976	Membership in a Euclidean space. We define Euclidean space here using Cartesian coordinates over 𝑁 space. We later abstract away from this using Tarski's geometry axioms, so this exact definition is unimportant. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ))
Theorem	mptelee 28977*	A condition for a mapping to be an element of a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by SN, 2-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	mpteleeOLD 28978*	Obsolete version of mptelee 28977 as of 2-Feb-2026. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	eleenn 28979	If 𝐴 is in (𝔼‘𝑁), then 𝑁 is a natural. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eleei 28980	The forward direction of elee 28976. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	eedimeq 28981	A point belongs to at most one Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀)) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)
Theorem	brbtwn 28982*	The binary relation form of the betweenness predicate. The statement 𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ should be informally read as "𝐴 lies on a line segment between 𝐵 and 𝐶. This exact definition is abstracted away by Tarski's geometry axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐵‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝐶‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	brcgr 28983*	The binary relation form of the congruence predicate. The statement ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ should be read informally as "the 𝑁 dimensional point 𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐶 is from 𝐷, or "the line segment 𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the line segment 𝐶𝐷. This particular definition is encapsulated by Tarski's axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))
Theorem	fveere 28984	The function value of a point is a real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	fveecn 28985	The function value of a point is a complex. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eqeefv 28986*	Two points are equal iff they agree in all dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (𝐵‘𝑖)))
Theorem	eqeelen 28987*	Two points are equal iff the square of the distance between them is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = 0))
Theorem	brbtwn2 28988*	Alternate characterization of betweenness, with no existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))))))
Theorem	colinearalglem1 28989	Lemma for colinearalg 28993. Expand out a multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐹 − 𝐷)) = ((𝐸 − 𝐷) · (𝐶 − 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝐵 · 𝐹) − ((𝐴 · 𝐹) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))) = ((𝐶 · 𝐸) − ((𝐴 · 𝐸) + (𝐶 · 𝐷)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem2 28990*	Lemma for colinearalg 28993. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)) · ((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))) = (((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗)) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem3 28991*	Lemma for colinearalg 28993. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · ((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))) = (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) · ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem4 28992*	Lemma for colinearalg 28993. Prove a disjunction that will be needed in the final proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)((((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖))) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · (((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐶‘𝑖))) ≤ 0))
Theorem	colinearalg 28993*	An algebraic characterization of colinearity. Note the similarity to brbtwn2 28988. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ((𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	eleesub 28994*	Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	eleesubd 28995*	Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. Deduction form of eleesub 28994. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
16.4.2.2  Tarski's axioms for geometry for the Euclidean space
Theorem	axdimuniq 28996	The unique dimension axiom. If a point is in 𝑁 dimensional space and in 𝑀 dimensional space, then 𝑁 = 𝑀. This axiom is not traditionally presented with Tarski's axioms, but we require it here as we are considering spaces in arbitrary dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀))) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)
Theorem	axcgrrflx 28997	𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐵 is from 𝐴. Axiom A1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩)
Theorem	axcgrtr 28998	Congruence is transitive. Axiom A2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	axcgrid 28999	If there is no distance between 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 = 𝐵. Axiom A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐶⟩ → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	axsegconlem1 29000*	Lemma for axsegcon 29010. Handle the degenerate case. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)(∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑥‘𝑖))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝑥‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))