Theorem kmlem5 10214

Description: Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
kmlem5	⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑧

Proof of Theorem kmlem5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		difss 4083	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤})) ⊆ 𝑤
2		sslin 4188	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤})) ⊆ 𝑤 → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤)
4		kmlem4 10213	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)
5	3, 4	sseqtrid 3973	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ∅)
6		ss0b 4351	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ∅ ↔ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)
7	5, 6	sylib 221	1 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ≠ wne 2956   ∖ cdif 3896   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899  ∅c0 4279  {csn 4584  ∪ cuni 4867

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-sn 4585  df-uni 4868

This theorem is used by:  kmlem9  10218