Theorem kmlem5 10237

Description: Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
kmlem5	⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑧

Proof of Theorem kmlem5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		difss 4072	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤})) ⊆ 𝑤
2		sslin 4139	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤})) ⊆ 𝑤 → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤)
4		kmlem4 10236	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)
5	3, 4	sseqtrid 3950	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ∅)
6		ss0b 4350	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) ⊆ ∅ ↔ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)
7	5, 6	sylib 221	1 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ≠ wne 2955   ⊆ wss 3895   ∖ cdif 4045   ∩ cin 4089  ∅c0 4278  {csn 4584  ∪ cuni 4866

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-nul 4279  df-sn 4585  df-uni 4867

This theorem is used by:  kmlem9  10241