P. 102 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10101-10200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
2.6.14  The Ackermann bijection
Theorem	ackbij2lem1 10101	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem1 10102	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1lem2 10103	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem3 10104	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem4 10105	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → {𝐴} ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem5 10106	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (card‘𝒫 suc 𝐴) = ((card‘𝒫 𝐴) +o (card‘𝒫 𝐴)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem6 10107	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem7 10108*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem8 10109*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘{𝐴}) = (card‘𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1lem9 10110*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐹‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((𝐹‘𝐴) +o (𝐹‘𝐵)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem10 10111*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)⟶ω
Theorem	ackbij1lem11 10112*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem12 10113*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	ackbij1lem13 10114*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	ackbij1lem14 10115*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘{𝐴}) = suc (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1lem15 10116*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)) → ¬ (𝐹‘(𝐴 ∩ suc 𝑐)) = (𝐹‘(𝐵 ∩ suc 𝑐)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem16 10117*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ackbij1lem17 10118*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)–1-1→ω
Theorem	ackbij1lem18 10119*	Lemma for ackbij1 10120. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑏) = suc (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1 10120*	The Ackermann bijection, part 1: each natural number can be uniquely coded in binary as a finite set of natural numbers and conversely. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)–1-1-onto→ω
Theorem	ackbij1b 10121*	The Ackermann bijection, part 1b: the bijection from ackbij1 10120 restricts naturally to the powers of particular naturals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹 “ 𝒫 𝐴) = (card‘𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij2lem2 10122*	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐴):(𝑅1‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→(card‘(𝑅1‘𝐴)))
Theorem	ackbij2lem3 10123*	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐴) ⊆ (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij2lem4 10124*	Lemma for ackbij2 10125. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐵) ⊆ (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij2 10125*	The Ackermann bijection, part 2: hereditarily finite sets can be represented by recursive binary notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ∪ (rec(𝐺, ∅) “ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐻:∪ (𝑅1 “ ω)–1-1-onto→ω
Theorem	r1om 10126	The set of hereditarily finite sets is countable. See ackbij2 10125 for an explicit bijection that works without Infinity. See also r1omALT 10659. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘ω) ≈ ω
Theorem	fictb 10127	A set is countable iff its collection of finite intersections is countable. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ ω ↔ (fi‘𝐴) ≼ ω))
2.6.15  Cofinality (without Axiom of Choice)
Theorem	cflem 10128*	A lemma used to simplify cofinality computations, showing the existence of the cardinal of an unbounded subset of a set 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) Avoid ax-11 2159. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 25-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = (card‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤)))
Theorem	cflemOLD 10129*	Obsolete version of cflem 10128 as of 25-Jul-2025. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = (card‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤)))
Theorem	cfval 10130*	Value of the cofinality function. Definition B of Saharon Shelah, Cardinal Arithmetic (1994), p. xxx (Roman numeral 30). The cofinality of an ordinal number 𝐴 is the cardinality (size) of the smallest unbounded subset 𝑦 of the ordinal number. Unbounded means that for every member of 𝐴, there is a member of 𝑦 that is at least as large. Cofinality is a measure of how "reachable from below" an ordinal is. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (cf‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = (card‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤))})
Theorem	cff 10131	Cofinality is a function on the class of ordinal numbers to the class of cardinal numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ cf:On⟶On
Theorem	cfub 10132*	An upper bound on cofinality. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (cf‘𝐴) ⊆ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = (card‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑦))}
Theorem	cflm 10133*	Value of the cofinality function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition of cofinality of [Enderton] p. 257. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (cf‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = (card‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑦))})
Theorem	cf0 10134	Value of the cofinality function at 0. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (cf‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	cardcf 10135	Cofinality is a cardinal number. Proposition 11.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (card‘(cf‘𝐴)) = (cf‘𝐴)
Theorem	cflecard 10136	Cofinality is bounded by the cardinality of its argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (cf‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐴)
Theorem	cfle 10137	Cofinality is bounded by its argument. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (cf‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	cfon 10138	The cofinality of any set is an ordinal (although it only makes sense when 𝐴 is an ordinal). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (cf‘𝐴) ∈ On
Theorem	cfeq0 10139	Only the ordinal zero has cofinality zero. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((cf‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
Theorem	cfsuc 10140	Value of the cofinality function at a successor ordinal. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (cf‘suc 𝐴) = 1o)
Theorem	cff1 10141*	There is always a map from (cf‘𝐴) to 𝐴 (this is a stronger condition than the definition, which only presupposes a map from some 𝑦 ≈ (cf‘𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑓(𝑓:(cf‘𝐴)–1-1→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ (cf‘𝐴)𝑧 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑤)))
Theorem	cfflb 10142*	If there is a cofinal map from 𝐵 to 𝐴, then 𝐵 is at least (cf‘𝐴). This theorem and cff1 10141 motivate the picture of (cf‘𝐴) as the greatest lower bound of the domain of cofinal maps into 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑤)) → (cf‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	cfval2 10143*	Another expression for the cofinality function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (cf‘𝐴) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤} (card‘𝑥))
Theorem	coflim 10144*	A simpler expression for the cofinality predicate, at a limit ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))
Theorem	cflim3 10145*	Another expression for the cofinality function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → (cf‘𝐴) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∪ 𝑥 = 𝐴} (card‘𝑥))
Theorem	cflim2 10146	The cofinality function is a limit ordinal iff its argument is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ Lim (cf‘𝐴))
Theorem	cfom 10147	Value of the cofinality function at omega (the set of natural numbers). Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (cf‘ω) = ω
Theorem	cfss 10148*	There is a cofinal subset of 𝐴 of cardinality (cf‘𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (cf‘𝐴) ∧ ∪ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
Theorem	cfslb 10149	Any cofinal subset of 𝐴 is at least as large as (cf‘𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∪ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → (cf‘𝐴) ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	cfslbn 10150	Any subset of 𝐴 smaller than its cofinality has union less than 𝐴. (This is the contrapositive to cfslb 10149.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ (cf‘𝐴)) → ∪ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cfslb2n 10151*	Any small collection of small subsets of 𝐴 cannot have union 𝐴, where "small" means smaller than the cofinality. This is a stronger version of cfslb 10149. This is a common application of cofinality: under AC, (ℵ‘1) is regular, so it is not a countable union of countable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≺ (cf‘𝐴))) → (𝐵 ≺ (cf‘𝐴) → ∪ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))
Theorem	cofsmo 10152*	Any cofinal map implies the existence of a strictly monotone cofinal map with a domain no larger than the original. Proposition 11.7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 101. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑓‘𝑤) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑤)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐵∃𝑔(𝑔:𝑥⟶𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑔‘𝑣))))
Theorem	cfsmolem 10153*	Lemma for cfsmo 10154. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑔‘dom 𝑧) ∪ ∪ 𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑧 suc (𝑧‘𝑡)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (recs(𝐹) ↾ (cf‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑓(𝑓:(cf‘𝐴)⟶𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ (cf‘𝐴)𝑧 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑤)))
Theorem	cfsmo 10154*	The map in cff1 10141 can be assumed to be a strictly monotone ordinal function without loss of generality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑓(𝑓:(cf‘𝐴)⟶𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ (cf‘𝐴)𝑧 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑤)))
Theorem	cfcoflem 10155*	Lemma for cfcof 10157, showing subset relation in one direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) → (cf‘𝐴) ⊆ (cf‘𝐵)))
Theorem	coftr 10156*	If there is a cofinal map from 𝐵 to 𝐴 and another from 𝐶 to 𝐴, then there is also a cofinal map from 𝐶 to 𝐵. Proposition 11.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 102. A limited form of transitivity for the "cof" relation. This is really a lemma for cfcof 10157. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ∩ {𝑛 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑡) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑛)})    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) → (∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐶⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑔‘𝑤)) → ∃ℎ(ℎ:𝐶⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ⊆ (ℎ‘𝑤))))
Theorem	cfcof 10157*	If there is a cofinal map from 𝐴 to 𝐵, then they have the same cofinality. This was used as Definition 11.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 100, who defines an equivalence relation cof (𝐴, 𝐵) and defines our cf(𝐵) as the minimum 𝐵 such that cof (𝐴, 𝐵). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑤)) → (cf‘𝐴) = (cf‘𝐵)))
Theorem	cfidm 10158	The cofinality function is idempotent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (cf‘(cf‘𝐴)) = (cf‘𝐴)
Theorem	alephsing 10159	The cofinality of a limit aleph is the same as the cofinality of its argument, so if (ℵ‘𝐴) < 𝐴, then (ℵ‘𝐴) is singular. Conversely, if (ℵ‘𝐴) is regular (i.e. weakly inaccessible), then (ℵ‘𝐴) = 𝐴, so 𝐴 has to be rather large (see alephfp 9991). Proposition 11.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 103. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → (cf‘(ℵ‘𝐴)) = (cf‘𝐴))
2.6.16  Eight inequivalent definitions of finite set
Theorem	sornom 10160*	The range of a single-step monotone function from ω into a partially ordered set is a chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ ω ((𝐹‘𝑎)𝑅(𝐹‘suc 𝑎) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑎)) ∧ 𝑅 Po ran 𝐹) → 𝑅 Or ran 𝐹)
Syntax	cfin1a 10161	Extend class notation to include the class of Ia-finite sets.
class FinIa
Syntax	cfin2 10162	Extend class notation to include the class of II-finite sets.
class FinII
Syntax	cfin4 10163	Extend class notation to include the class of IV-finite sets.
class FinIV
Syntax	cfin3 10164	Extend class notation to include the class of III-finite sets.
class FinIII
Syntax	cfin5 10165	Extend class notation to include the class of V-finite sets.
class FinV
Syntax	cfin6 10166	Extend class notation to include the class of VI-finite sets.
class FinVI
Syntax	cfin7 10167	Extend class notation to include the class of VII-finite sets.
class FinVII
Definition	df-fin1a 10168*	A set is Ia-finite iff it is not the union of two I-infinite sets. Equivalent to definition Ia of [Levy58] p. 2. A I-infinite Ia-finite set is also known as an amorphous set. This is the second of Levy's eight definitions of finite set. Levy's I-finite is equivalent to our df-fin 8868 and not repeated here. These eight definitions are equivalent with Choice but strictly decreasing in strength in models where Choice fails; conversely, they provide a series of increasingly stronger notions of infiniteness. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Nov-2014.)
⊢ FinIa = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(𝑦 ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 ∖ 𝑦) ∈ Fin)}
Definition	df-fin2 10169*	A set is II-finite (Tarski finite) iff every nonempty chain of subsets contains a maximum element. Definition II of [Levy58] p. 2. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Nov-2014.)
⊢ FinII = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑥((𝑦 ≠ ∅ ∧ [⊊] Or 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)}
Definition	df-fin4 10170*	A set is IV-finite (Dedekind finite) iff it has no equinumerous proper subset. Definition IV of [Levy58] p. 3. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Nov-2014.)
⊢ FinIV = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 ≈ 𝑥)}
Definition	df-fin3 10171	A set is III-finite (weakly Dedekind finite) iff its power set is Dedekind finite. Definition III of [Levy58] p. 2. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Nov-2014.)
⊢ FinIII = {𝑥 ∣ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ FinIV}
Definition	df-fin5 10172	A set is V-finite iff it behaves finitely under ⊔. Definition V of [Levy58] p. 3. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Nov-2014.)
⊢ FinV = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 ≺ (𝑥 ⊔ 𝑥))}
Definition	df-fin6 10173	A set is VI-finite iff it behaves finitely under ×. Definition VI of [Levy58] p. 4. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Nov-2014.)
⊢ FinVI = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ≺ 2o ∨ 𝑥 ≺ (𝑥 × 𝑥))}
Definition	df-fin7 10174*	A set is VII-finite iff it cannot be infinitely well-ordered. Equivalent to definition VII of [Levy58] p. 4. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Nov-2014.)
⊢ FinVII = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ (On ∖ ω)𝑥 ≈ 𝑦}
Theorem	isfin1a 10175*	Definition of a Ia-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIa ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ∈ Fin ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦) ∈ Fin)))
Theorem	fin1ai 10176	Property of a Ia-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ FinIa ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∈ Fin ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∈ Fin))
Theorem	isfin2 10177*	Definition of a II-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinII ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐴((𝑦 ≠ ∅ ∧ [⊊] Or 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	fin2i 10178	Property of a II-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ FinII ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ [⊊] Or 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	isfin3 10179	Definition of a III-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinIII ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ FinIV)
Theorem	isfin4 10180*	Definition of a IV-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIV ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ≈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	fin4i 10181	Infer that a set is IV-infinite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ FinIV)
Theorem	isfin5 10182	Definition of a V-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinV ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐴 ≺ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐴)))
Theorem	isfin6 10183	Definition of a VI-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinVI ↔ (𝐴 ≺ 2o ∨ 𝐴 ≺ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	isfin7 10184*	Definition of a VII-finite set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinVII ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ (On ∖ ω)𝐴 ≈ 𝑦))
Theorem	sdom2en01 10185	A set with less than two elements has 0 or 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 2o ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 1o))
Theorem	infpssrlem1 10186	Lemma for infpssr 10191. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (rec(◡𝐹, 𝐶) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝐶)
Theorem	infpssrlem2 10187	Lemma for infpssr 10191. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (rec(◡𝐹, 𝐶) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ω → (𝐺‘suc 𝑀) = (◡𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑀)))
Theorem	infpssrlem3 10188	Lemma for infpssr 10191. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (rec(◡𝐹, 𝐶) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ω⟶𝐴)
Theorem	infpssrlem4 10189	Lemma for infpssr 10191. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (rec(◡𝐹, 𝐶) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀) → (𝐺‘𝑀) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑁))
Theorem	infpssrlem5 10190	Lemma for infpssr 10191. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (rec(◡𝐹, 𝐶) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ω ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	infpssr 10191	Dedekind infinity implies existence of a denumerable subset: take a single point witnessing the proper subset relation and iterate the embedding. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ω ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	fin4en1 10192	Dedekind finite is a cardinal property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIV → 𝐵 ∈ FinIV))
Theorem	ssfin4 10193	Dedekind finite sets have Dedekind finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ FinIV ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ FinIV)
Theorem	domfin4 10194	A set dominated by a Dedekind finite set is Dedekind finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ FinIV ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ FinIV)
Theorem	ominf4 10195	ω is Dedekind infinite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ ¬ ω ∈ FinIV
Theorem	infpssALT 10196*	Alternate proof of infpss 10099, shorter but requiring Replacement (ax-rep 5215). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴))
Theorem	isfin4-2 10197	Alternate definition of IV-finite sets: they lack a denumerable subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIV ↔ ¬ ω ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	isfin4p1 10198	Alternate definition of IV-finite sets: they are strictly dominated by their successors. (Thus, the proper subset referred to in isfin4 10180 can be assumed to be only a singleton smaller than the original.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinIV ↔ 𝐴 ≺ (𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	fin23lem7 10199*	Lemma for isfin2-2 10202. The componentwise complement of a nonempty collection of sets is nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	fin23lem11 10200*	Lemma for isfin2-2 10202. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = (𝐴 ∖ 𝑣) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑐) ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑤 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑐) ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓))