P. 102 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10101-10200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	fin23lem19 10101*	Lemma for fin23 10154. The first set in 𝑈 to see an input set is either contained in it or disjoint from it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ((𝑈‘suc 𝐴) ⊆ (𝑡‘𝐴) ∨ ((𝑈‘suc 𝐴) ∩ (𝑡‘𝐴)) = ∅))
Theorem	fin23lem20 10102*	Lemma for fin23 10154. 𝑋 is either contained in or disjoint from all input sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (∩ ran 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑡‘𝐴) ∨ (∩ ran 𝑈 ∩ (𝑡‘𝐴)) = ∅))
Theorem	fin23lem17 10103*	Lemma for fin23 10154. By ? Fin3DS ? , 𝑈 achieves its minimum (𝑋 in the synopsis above, but we will not be assigning a symbol here). TODO: Fix comment; math symbol Fin3DS does not exist. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((∪ ran 𝑡 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑡:ω–1-1→𝑉) → ∩ ran 𝑈 ∈ ran 𝑈)
Theorem	fin23lem21 10104*	Lemma for fin23 10154. 𝑋 is not empty. We only need here that 𝑡 has at least one set in its range besides ∅; the much stronger hypothesis here will serve as our induction hypothesis though. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((∪ ran 𝑡 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑡:ω–1-1→𝑉) → ∩ ran 𝑈 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	fin23lem28 10105*	Lemma for fin23 10154. The residual is also one-to-one. This preserves the induction invariant. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = {𝑣 ∈ ω ∣ ∩ ran 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑡‘𝑣)}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑃) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (ω ∖ 𝑃)(𝑥 ∩ (ω ∖ 𝑃)) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = if(𝑃 ∈ Fin, (𝑡 ∘ 𝑅), ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ ((𝑡‘𝑧) ∖ ∩ ran 𝑈)) ∘ 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑡:ω–1-1→V → 𝑍:ω–1-1→V)
Theorem	fin23lem29 10106*	Lemma for fin23 10154. The residual is built from the same elements as the previous sequence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = {𝑣 ∈ ω ∣ ∩ ran 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑡‘𝑣)}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑃) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (ω ∖ 𝑃)(𝑥 ∩ (ω ∖ 𝑃)) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = if(𝑃 ∈ Fin, (𝑡 ∘ 𝑅), ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ ((𝑡‘𝑧) ∖ ∩ ran 𝑈)) ∘ 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ ran 𝑍 ⊆ ∪ ran 𝑡
Theorem	fin23lem30 10107*	Lemma for fin23 10154. The residual is disjoint from the common set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = {𝑣 ∈ ω ∣ ∩ ran 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑡‘𝑣)}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑃) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (ω ∖ 𝑃)(𝑥 ∩ (ω ∖ 𝑃)) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = if(𝑃 ∈ Fin, (𝑡 ∘ 𝑅), ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ ((𝑡‘𝑧) ∖ ∩ ran 𝑈)) ∘ 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝑡 → (∪ ran 𝑍 ∩ ∩ ran 𝑈) = ∅)
Theorem	fin23lem31 10108*	Lemma for fin23 10154. The residual is has a strictly smaller range than the previous sequence. This will be iterated to build an unbounded chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = {𝑣 ∈ ω ∣ ∩ ran 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑡‘𝑣)}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑃) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (ω ∖ 𝑃)(𝑥 ∩ (ω ∖ 𝑃)) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = if(𝑃 ∈ Fin, (𝑡 ∘ 𝑅), ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ ((𝑡‘𝑧) ∖ ∩ ran 𝑈)) ∘ 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑡:ω–1-1→𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ ∪ ran 𝑡 ⊆ 𝐺) → ∪ ran 𝑍 ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑡)
Theorem	fin23lem32 10109*	Lemma for fin23 10154. Wrap the previous construction into a function to hide the hypotheses. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑈 = seqω((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ if(((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢) = ∅, 𝑢, ((𝑡‘𝑖) ∩ 𝑢))), ∪ ran 𝑡)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = {𝑣 ∈ ω ∣ ∩ ran 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑡‘𝑣)}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑃) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑤 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (ω ∖ 𝑃)(𝑥 ∩ (ω ∖ 𝑃)) ≈ 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = if(𝑃 ∈ Fin, (𝑡 ∘ 𝑅), ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ ((𝑡‘𝑧) ∖ ∩ ran 𝑈)) ∘ 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 → ∃𝑓∀𝑏((𝑏:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran 𝑏 ⊆ 𝐺) → ((𝑓‘𝑏):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑓‘𝑏) ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑏)))
Theorem	fin23lem33 10110*	Lemma for fin23 10154. Discharge hypotheses. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 → ∃𝑓∀𝑏((𝑏:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran 𝑏 ⊆ 𝐺) → ((𝑓‘𝑏):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑓‘𝑏) ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑏)))
Theorem	fin23lem34 10111*	Lemma for fin23 10154. Establish induction invariants on 𝑌 which parameterizes our contradictory chain of subsets. In this section, ℎ is the hypothetically assumed family of subsets, 𝑔 is the ground set, and 𝑖 is the induction function constructed in the previous section. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℎ:ω–1-1→V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ ran ℎ ⊆ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗((𝑗:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran 𝑗 ⊆ 𝐺) → ((𝑖‘𝑗):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑖‘𝑗) ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (rec(𝑖, ℎ) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → ((𝑌‘𝐴):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑌‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐺))
Theorem	fin23lem35 10112*	Lemma for fin23 10154. Strict order property of 𝑌. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℎ:ω–1-1→V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ ran ℎ ⊆ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗((𝑗:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran 𝑗 ⊆ 𝐺) → ((𝑖‘𝑗):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑖‘𝑗) ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (rec(𝑖, ℎ) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → ∪ ran (𝑌‘suc 𝐴) ⊊ ∪ ran (𝑌‘𝐴))
Theorem	fin23lem36 10113*	Lemma for fin23 10154. Weak order property of 𝑌. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℎ:ω–1-1→V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ ran ℎ ⊆ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗((𝑗:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran 𝑗 ⊆ 𝐺) → ((𝑖‘𝑗):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑖‘𝑗) ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (rec(𝑖, ℎ) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → ∪ ran (𝑌‘𝐴) ⊆ ∪ ran (𝑌‘𝐵))
Theorem	fin23lem38 10114*	Lemma for fin23 10154. The contradictory chain has no minimum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℎ:ω–1-1→V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ ran ℎ ⊆ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗((𝑗:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran 𝑗 ⊆ 𝐺) → ((𝑖‘𝑗):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑖‘𝑗) ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (rec(𝑖, ℎ) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran (𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ∪ ran (𝑌‘𝑏)) ∈ ran (𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ∪ ran (𝑌‘𝑏)))
Theorem	fin23lem39 10115*	Lemma for fin23 10154. Thus, we have that 𝑔 could not have been in 𝐹 after all. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℎ:ω–1-1→V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ ran ℎ ⊆ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗((𝑗:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran 𝑗 ⊆ 𝐺) → ((𝑖‘𝑗):ω–1-1→V ∧ ∪ ran (𝑖‘𝑗) ⊊ ∪ ran 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (rec(𝑖, ℎ) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)
Theorem	fin23lem40 10116*	Lemma for fin23 10154. FinII sets satisfy the descending chain condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinII → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐹)
Theorem	fin23lem41 10117*	Lemma for fin23 10154. A set which satisfies the descending sequence condition must be III-finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 → 𝐴 ∈ FinIII)
Theorem	isf32lem1 10118*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Derive weak ordering property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	isf32lem2 10119*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Non-minimum implies that there is always another decrease. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ω (𝐴 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝐹‘suc 𝑎) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝑎)))
Theorem	isf32lem3 10120*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Being a chain, difference sets are disjoint (one case). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅)
Theorem	isf32lem4 10121*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Being a chain, difference sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅)
Theorem	isf32lem5 10122*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. There are infinite decrease points. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ ω ∣ (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	isf32lem6 10123*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Each K value is nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ ω ∣ (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑢 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑆) ≈ 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑤) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝑤))) ∘ 𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → (𝐾‘𝐴) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	isf32lem7 10124*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Different K values are disjoint. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ ω ∣ (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑢 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑆) ≈ 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑤) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝑤))) ∘ 𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω)) → ((𝐾‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐾‘𝐵)) = ∅)
Theorem	isf32lem8 10125*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. K sets are subsets of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ ω ∣ (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑢 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑆) ≈ 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑤) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝑤))) ∘ 𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → (𝐾‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐺)
Theorem	isf32lem9 10126*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Construction of the onto function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ ω ∣ (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑢 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑆) ≈ 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑤) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝑤))) ∘ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (℩𝑠(𝑠 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐾‘𝑠))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:𝐺–onto→ω)
Theorem	isf32lem10 10127*	Lemma for isfin3-2 . Write in terms of weak dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ ω ∣ (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑢 ∈ ω ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑆) ≈ 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑤) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝑤))) ∘ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (℩𝑠(𝑠 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐾‘𝑠))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → ω ≼* 𝐺))
Theorem	isf32lem11 10128*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. Remove hypotheses from isf32lem10 10127. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏) ∧ ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)) → ω ≼* 𝐺)
Theorem	isf32lem12 10129*	Lemma for isfin3-2 10132. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (¬ ω ≼* 𝐺 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	isfin32i 10130	One half of isfin3-2 10132. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinIII → ¬ ω ≼* 𝐴)
Theorem	isf33lem 10131*	Lemma for isfin3-3 10133. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ FinIII = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝒫 𝑔 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑎‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎)}
Theorem	isfin3-2 10132	Weakly Dedekind-infinite sets are exactly those which can be mapped onto ω. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIII ↔ ¬ ω ≼* 𝐴))
Theorem	isfin3-3 10133*	Weakly Dedekind-infinite sets are exactly those with an ω-indexed descending chain of subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIII ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑓‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑥) → ∩ ran 𝑓 ∈ ran 𝑓)))
Theorem	fin33i 10134*	Inference from isfin3-3 10133. (This is actually a bit stronger than isfin3-3 10133 because it does not assume 𝐹 is a set and does not use the Axiom of Infinity either.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ FinIII ∧ 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) → ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	compsscnvlem 10135*	Lemma for compsscnv 10136. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦)))
Theorem	compsscnv 10136*	Complementation on a power set lattice is an involution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹
Theorem	isf34lem1 10137*	Lemma for isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋))
Theorem	isf34lem2 10138*	Lemma for isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐴⟶𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	compssiso 10139*	Complementation is an antiautomorphism on power set lattices. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 Isom [⊊] , ◡ [⊊] (𝒫 𝐴, 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	isf34lem3 10140*	Lemma for isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) → (𝐹 “ (𝐹 “ 𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	compss 10141*	Express image under of the complementation isomorphism. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐺) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐺}
Theorem	isf34lem4 10142*	Lemma for isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑋) = ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
Theorem	isf34lem5 10143*	Lemma for isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝐹‘∩ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
Theorem	isf34lem7 10144*	Lemma for isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ FinIII ∧ 𝐺:ω⟶𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝐺‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐺‘suc 𝑦)) → ∪ ran 𝐺 ∈ ran 𝐺)
Theorem	isf34lem6 10145*	Lemma for isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIII ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ↑m ω)(∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝑓‘suc 𝑦) → ∪ ran 𝑓 ∈ ran 𝑓)))
Theorem	fin34i 10146*	Inference from isfin3-4 10147. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ FinIII ∧ 𝐺:ω⟶𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐺‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐺‘suc 𝑥)) → ∪ ran 𝐺 ∈ ran 𝐺)
Theorem	isfin3-4 10147*	Weakly Dedekind-infinite sets are exactly those with an ω-indexed ascending chain of subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIII ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ↑m ω)(∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘suc 𝑥) → ∪ ran 𝑓 ∈ ran 𝑓)))
Theorem	fin11a 10148	Every I-finite set is Ia-finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ∈ FinIa)
Theorem	enfin1ai 10149	Ia-finiteness is a cardinal property. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ FinIa → 𝐵 ∈ FinIa))
Theorem	isfin1-2 10150	A set is finite in the usual sense iff the power set of its power set is Dedekind finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ FinIV)
Theorem	isfin1-3 10151	A set is I-finite iff every system of subsets contains a maximal subset. Definition I of [Levy58] p. 2. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ◡ [⊊] Fr 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	isfin1-4 10152	A set is I-finite iff every system of subsets contains a minimal subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ [⊊] Fr 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	dffin1-5 10153	Compact quantifier-free version of the standard definition df-fin 8746. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Fin = ( ≈ “ ω)
Theorem	fin23 10154	Every II-finite set (every chain of subsets has a maximal element) is III-finite (has no denumerable collection of subsets). The proof here is the only one I could find, from http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm6/fm619.pdf p.94 (writeup by Tarski, credited to Kuratowski). Translated into English and modern notation, the proof proceeds as follows (variables renamed for uniqueness): Suppose for a contradiction that 𝐴 is a set which is II-finite but not III-finite. For any countable sequence of distinct subsets 𝑇 of 𝐴, we can form a decreasing sequence of nonempty subsets (𝑈‘𝑇) by taking finite intersections of initial segments of 𝑇 while skipping over any element of 𝑇 which would cause the intersection to be empty. By II-finiteness (as fin2i2 10083) this sequence contains its intersection, call it 𝑌; since by induction every subset in the sequence 𝑈 is nonempty, the intersection must be nonempty. Suppose that an element 𝑋 of 𝑇 has nonempty intersection with 𝑌. Thus, said element has a nonempty intersection with the corresponding element of 𝑈, therefore it was used in the construction of 𝑈 and all further elements of 𝑈 are subsets of 𝑋, thus 𝑋 contains the 𝑌. That is, all elements of 𝑋 either contain 𝑌 or are disjoint from it. Since there are only two cases, there must exist an infinite subset of 𝑇 which uniformly either contain 𝑌 or are disjoint from it. In the former case we can create an infinite set by subtracting 𝑌 from each element. In either case, call the result 𝑍; this is an infinite set of subsets of 𝐴, each of which is disjoint from 𝑌 and contained in the union of 𝑇; the union of 𝑍 is strictly contained in the union of 𝑇, because only the latter is a superset of the nonempty set 𝑌. The preceding four steps may be iterated a countable number of times starting from the assumed denumerable set of subsets to produce a denumerable sequence 𝐵 of the 𝑇 sets from each stage. Great caution is required to avoid ax-dc 10211 here; in particular an effective version of the pigeonhole principle (for aleph-null pigeons and 2 holes) is required. Since a denumerable set of subsets is assumed to exist, we can conclude ω ∈ V without the axiom. This 𝐵 sequence is strictly decreasing, thus it has no minimum, contradicting the first assumption. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinII → 𝐴 ∈ FinIII)
Theorem	fin34 10155	Every III-finite set is IV-finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinIII → 𝐴 ∈ FinIV)
Theorem	isfin5-2 10156	Alternate definition of V-finite which emphasizes the idempotent behavior of V-infinite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinV ↔ ¬ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐴))))
Theorem	fin45 10157	Every IV-finite set is V-finite: if we can pack two copies of the set into itself, we can certainly leave space. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinIV → 𝐴 ∈ FinV)
Theorem	fin56 10158	Every V-finite set is VI-finite because multiplication dominates addition for cardinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinV → 𝐴 ∈ FinVI)
Theorem	fin17 10159	Every I-finite set is VII-finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ∈ FinVII)
Theorem	fin67 10160	Every VI-finite set is VII-finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinVI → 𝐴 ∈ FinVII)
Theorem	isfin7-2 10161	A set is VII-finite iff it is non-well-orderable or finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ FinVII ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)))
Theorem	fin71num 10162	A well-orderable set is VII-finite iff it is I-finite. Thus, even without choice, on the class of well-orderable sets all eight definitions of finite set coincide. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (𝐴 ∈ FinVII ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	dffin7-2 10163	Class form of isfin7-2 10161. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ FinVII = (Fin ∪ (V ∖ dom card))
Theorem	dfacfin7 10164	Axiom of Choice equivalent: the VII-finite sets are the same as I-finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ FinVII = Fin)
Theorem	fin1a2lem1 10165	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑆‘𝐴) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	fin1a2lem2 10166	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆:On–1-1→On
Theorem	fin1a2lem3 10167	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (2o ·o 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐸‘𝐴) = (2o ·o 𝐴))
Theorem	fin1a2lem4 10168	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (2o ·o 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸:ω–1-1→ω
Theorem	fin1a2lem5 10169	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (2o ·o 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐸 ↔ ¬ suc 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐸))
Theorem	fin1a2lem6 10170	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. Establish that ω can be broken into two equipollent pieces. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (2o ·o 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ↾ ran 𝐸):ran 𝐸–1-1-onto→(ω ∖ ran 𝐸)
Theorem	fin1a2lem7 10171*	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. Split a III-infinite set in two pieces. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (2o ·o 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ∈ FinIII ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦) ∈ FinIII)) → 𝐴 ∈ FinIII)
Theorem	fin1a2lem8 10172*	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. Split a III-infinite set in two pieces. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ FinIII ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ FinIII)) → 𝐴 ∈ FinIII)
Theorem	fin1a2lem9 10173*	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. In a chain of finite sets, initial segments are finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → {𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ 𝑏 ≼ 𝐴} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fin1a2lem10 10174	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. A nonempty finite union of members of a chain is a member of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ [⊊] Or 𝐴) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	fin1a2lem11 10175*	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → ran (𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑐 ≼ 𝑏}) = (𝐴 ∪ {∅}))
Theorem	fin1a2lem12 10176	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ FinIII)
Theorem	fin1a2lem13 10177	Lemma for fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝐶 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ∈ FinII)
Theorem	fin12 10178	Weak theorem which skips Ia but has a trivial proof, needed to prove fin1a2 10180. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ∈ FinII)
Theorem	fin1a2s 10179*	An II-infinite set can have an I-infinite part broken off and remain II-infinite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ Fin ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ FinII)) → 𝐴 ∈ FinII)
Theorem	fin1a2 10180	Every Ia-finite set is II-finite. Theorem 1 of [Levy58], p. 3. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ FinIa → 𝐴 ∈ FinII)
2.6.17  Hereditarily size-limited sets without Choice
Theorem	itunifval 10181*	Function value of iterated unions. EDITORIAL: The iterated unions and order types of ordered sets are split out here because they could conceivably be independently useful. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈‘𝐴) = (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝐴) ↾ ω))
Theorem	itunifn 10182*	Functionality of the iterated union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈‘𝐴) Fn ω)
Theorem	ituni0 10183*	A zero-fold iterated union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑈‘𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	itunisuc 10184*	Successor iterated union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈‘𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = ∪ ((𝑈‘𝐴)‘𝐵)
Theorem	itunitc1 10185*	Each union iterate is a member of the transitive closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ⊆ (TC‘𝐴)
Theorem	itunitc 10186*	The union of all union iterates creates the transitive closure; compare trcl 9495. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    ⇒   ⊢ (TC‘𝐴) = ∪ ran (𝑈‘𝐴)
Theorem	ituniiun 10187*	Unwrap an iterated union from the "other end". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑈‘𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑈‘𝑎)‘𝐵))
Theorem	hsmexlem7 10188*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. Properties of the recurrent sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (har‘𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑧))), (har‘𝒫 𝑋)) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻‘∅) = (har‘𝒫 𝑋)
Theorem	hsmexlem8 10189*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. Properties of the recurrent sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (har‘𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑧))), (har‘𝒫 𝑋)) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ω → (𝐻‘suc 𝑎) = (har‘𝒫 (𝑋 × (𝐻‘𝑎))))
Theorem	hsmexlem9 10190*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. Properties of the recurrent sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (har‘𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑧))), (har‘𝒫 𝑋)) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ω → (𝐻‘𝑎) ∈ On)
Theorem	hsmexlem1 10191	Lemma for hsmex 10197. Bound the order type of a limited-cardinality set of ordinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≼* 𝐵) → dom 𝑂 ∈ (har‘𝒫 𝐵))
Theorem	hsmexlem2 10192*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. Bound the order type of a union of sets of ordinals, each of limited order type. Vaguely reminiscent of unictb 10340 but use of order types allows to canonically choose the sub-bijections, removing the choice requirement. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso( E , 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , ∪ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 On ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶)) → dom 𝐺 ∈ (har‘𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	hsmexlem3 10193*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. Clear 𝐼 hypothesis and extend previous result by dominance. Note that this could be substantially strengthened, e.g., using the weak Hartogs function, but all we need here is that there be *some* dominating ordinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso( E , 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , ∪ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ≼* 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 On ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶)) → dom 𝐺 ∈ (har‘𝒫 (𝐷 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	hsmexlem4 10194*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. The core induction, establishing bounds on the order types of iterated unions of the initial set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (har‘𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑧))), (har‘𝒫 𝑋)) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑎 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (TC‘{𝑎})𝑏 ≼ 𝑋}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (rank “ ((𝑈‘𝑑)‘𝑐)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑐 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑆) → dom 𝑂 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑐))
Theorem	hsmexlem5 10195*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. Combining the above constraints, along with itunitc 10186 and tcrank 9651, gives an effective constraint on the rank of 𝑆. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (har‘𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑧))), (har‘𝒫 𝑋)) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑎 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (TC‘{𝑎})𝑏 ≼ 𝑋}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (rank “ ((𝑈‘𝑑)‘𝑐)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑑 ∈ 𝑆 → (rank‘𝑑) ∈ (har‘𝒫 (ω × ∪ ran 𝐻)))
Theorem	hsmexlem6 10196*	Lemma for hsmex 10197. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (har‘𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑧))), (har‘𝒫 𝑋)) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑦), 𝑥) ↾ ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑎 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (TC‘{𝑎})𝑏 ≼ 𝑋}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (rank “ ((𝑈‘𝑑)‘𝑐)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
Theorem	hsmex 10197*	The collection of hereditarily size-limited well-founded sets comprise a set. The proof is that of Randall Holmes at http://math.boisestate.edu/~holmes/holmes/hereditary.pdf, with modifications to use Hartogs' theorem instead of the weak variant (inconsequentially weakening some intermediate results), and making the well-foundedness condition explicit to avoid a direct dependence on ax-reg 9360. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑠 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (TC‘{𝑠})𝑥 ≼ 𝑋} ∈ V)
Theorem	hsmex2 10198*	The set of hereditary size-limited sets, assuming ax-reg 9360. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑠 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (TC‘{𝑠})𝑥 ≼ 𝑋} ∈ V)
Theorem	hsmex3 10199*	The set of hereditary size-limited sets, assuming ax-reg 9360, using strict comparison (an easy corollary by separation). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑠 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (TC‘{𝑠})𝑥 ≺ 𝑋} ∈ V)
PART 3  ZFC (ZERMELO-FRAENKEL WITH CHOICE) SET THEORY In this section we add the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10224, as well as weaker forms such as the axiom of countable choice ax-cc 10200 and dependent choice ax-dc 10211. We introduce these weaker forms so that theorems that do not need the full power of the axiom of choice, but need more than simple ZF, can use these intermediate axioms instead. The combination of the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms and the axiom of choice is often abbreviated as ZFC. The axiom of choice is widely accepted, and ZFC is the most commonly-accepted fundamental set of axioms for mathematics. However, there have been and still are some lingering controversies about the Axiom of Choice. The axiom of choice does not satisfy those who wish to have a constructive proof (e.g., it will not satisfy intuitionistic logic). Thus, we make it easy to identify which proofs depend on the axiom of choice or its weaker forms.
3.1  ZFC Set Theory - add Countable Choice and Dependent Choice
3.1.1  Introduce the Axiom of Countable Choice
Axiom	ax-cc 10200*	The axiom of countable choice (CC), also known as the axiom of denumerable choice. It is clearly a special case of ac5 10242, but is weak enough that it can be proven using DC (see axcc 10223). It is, however, strictly stronger than ZF and cannot be proven in ZF. It states that any countable collection of nonempty sets must have a choice function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 ≈ ω → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))