Theorem notabw 4265

Description: A class abstraction defined by a negation. Version of notab 4266 using implicit substitution, which does not require ax-10 2174, ax-12 2211. (Contributed by GG, 15-Oct-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
notabw.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notabw	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = (V ∖ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem notabw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3457	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2	1	biantrur 538	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}))
3		df-clab 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜓)
4		notabw.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	4	bicomd 225	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
6	5	equcoms 2039	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
7	6	sbievw 2126	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)
8	3, 7	bitri 277	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜑)
9	2, 8	xchnxbi 334	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}))
10	9	abbii 2828	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})}
11		df-dif 3907	. 2 ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})}
12	10, 11	eqtr4i 2787	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = (V ∖ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559  [wsb 2089   ∈ wcel 2141  {cab 2739  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3901

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-tru 1562  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907

This theorem is referenced by:  dfif3  4494