Theorem pm5.6 999

Description: Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent. Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm5.6	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem pm5.6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		impexp 454	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
2		df-or 845	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	imbi2i 339	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	bitr4i 281	1 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 844

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845

This theorem is referenced by:  ssundif  4391  brdom3  9939  grothprim  10245  eliccelico  30526  elicoelioo  30527  ballotlemfc0  31860  ballotlemfcc  31861  elicc3  33778  ifpidg  40199  dfsucon  40231  icccncfext  42529