Theorem pm5.6 999

Description: Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent. Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm5.6	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem pm5.6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		impexp 451	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
2		df-or 845	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	imbi2i 336	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	bitr4i 277	1 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 844

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845

This theorem is referenced by:  ssundif  4418  brdom3  10284  grothprim  10590  eliccelico  31098  elicoelioo  31099  ballotlemfc0  32459  ballotlemfcc  32460  elicc3  34506  ifpidg  41098  dfsucon  41130  icccncfext  43428