P. 10 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 901-1000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	orel1 901	Elimination of disjunction by denial of a disjunct. Theorem *2.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.25 902	Theorem *2.25 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	orel2 903	Elimination of disjunction by denial of a disjunct. Theorem *2.56 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.67-2 904	Slight generalization of Theorem *2.67 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.67 905	Theorem *2.67 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	curryax 906	A non-intuitionistic positive statement, sometimes called a paradox of material implication. Sometimes called Curry's axiom. Similar to exmid 907 (obtained by substituting ⊥ for 𝜓) but positive. For another non-intuitionistic positive statement, see peirce 205. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	exmid 907	Law of excluded middle, also called the principle of tertium non datur. Theorem *2.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. It says that something is either true or not true; there are no in-between values of truth. This is an essential distinction of our classical logic and is not a theorem of intuitionistic logic. In intuitionistic logic, if this statement is true for some 𝜑, then 𝜑 is decidable. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1992.)
⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	exmidd 908	Law of excluded middle in a context. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.1 909	Theorem *2.1 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm2.13 910	Theorem *2.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm2.621 911	Theorem *2.621 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.62 912	Theorem *2.62 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.68 913	Theorem *2.68 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	dfor2 914	Logical 'or' expressed in terms of implication only. Theorem *5.25 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.07 915	Theorem *2.07 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	pm1.2 916	Axiom *1.2 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 96, which they call "Taut". (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	oridm 917	Idempotent law for disjunction. Theorem *4.25 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 16-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm4.25 918	Theorem *4.25 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.4 919	Theorem *2.4 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.41 920	Theorem *2.41 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	orim12i 921	Disjoin antecedents and consequents of two premises. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))
Theorem	orim1i 922	Introduce disjunct to both sides of an implication. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	orim2i 923	Introduce disjunct to both sides of an implication. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	orim12dALT 924	Alternate proof of orim12d 979 which does not depend on df-an 401. This is an illustration of the conservativity of definitions (definitions do not permit to prove additional theorems whose statements do not contain the defined symbol). (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Aug-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)))
Theorem	orbi2i 925	Inference adding a left disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	orbi1i 926	Inference adding a right disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	orbi12i 927	Infer the disjunction of two equivalences. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))
Theorem	orbi2d 928	Deduction adding a left disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orbi1d 929	Deduction adding a right disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	orbi1 930	Theorem *4.37 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orbi12d 931	Deduction joining two equivalences to form equivalence of disjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)))
Theorem	pm1.5 932	Axiom *1.5 (Assoc) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	or12 933	Swap two disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orass 934	Associative law for disjunction. Theorem *4.33 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.31 935	Theorem *2.31 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm2.32 936	Theorem *2.32 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.3 937	Theorem *2.3 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	or32 938	A rearrangement of disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	or4 939	Rearrangement of 4 disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	or42 940	Rearrangement of 4 disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	orordi 941	Distribution of disjunction over disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1995.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orordir 942	Distribution of disjunction over disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orimdi 943	Disjunction distributes over implication. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.76 944	Theorem *2.76 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.85 945	Theorem *2.85 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.75 946	Theorem *2.75 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm4.78 947	Implication distributes over disjunction. Theorem *4.78 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	biort 948	A disjunction with a true formula is equivalent to that true formula. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	biorf 949	A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood. Theorem *4.74 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	biortn 950	A wff is equivalent to its negated disjunction with falsehood. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	biorfi 951	The dual of biorf 949 is not biantr 817 but iba 536 (and ibar 537). So there should also be a "biorfr". (Note that these four statements can actually be strengthened to biconditionals.) (Contributed by BJ, 26-Oct-2019.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	biorfri 952	A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Jul-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	biorfriOLD 953	Obsolete version of biorfri 952 as of 10-Aug-2025. A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.26 954	Theorem *2.26 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. See pm2.27 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.63 955	Theorem *2.63 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.64 956	Theorem *2.64 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.42 957	Theorem *2.42 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm5.11g 958	A general instance of Theorem *5.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.11 959	Theorem *5.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm5.12 960	Theorem *5.12 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm5.14 961	Theorem *5.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.13 962	Theorem *5.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	pm5.55 963	Theorem *5.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜑) ∨ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm4.72 964	Implication in terms of biconditional and disjunction. Theorem *4.72 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	imimorb 965	Simplify an implication between implications. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	oibabs 966	Absorption of disjunction into equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	orbidi 967	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional. An axiom of system DS in Vladimir Lifschitz, "On calculational proofs" (1998), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.25.3384. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm5.7 968	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional. Theorem *5.7 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. This theorem is similar to orbidi 967. (Contributed by Roy F. Longton, 21-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
1.2.8  Mixed connectives This section gathers theorems of propositional calculus which use (either in their statement or proof) mixed connectives (at least conjunction and disjunction). As noted in the "note on definitions" in the section comment for logical equivalence, some theorem statements may contain for instance only conjunction or only disjunction, but both definitions are used in their proofs to make them shorter (this is exemplified in orim12d 979 versus orim12dALT 924). These theorems are mostly grouped at the beginning of this section. The family of theorems starting with animorl 993 focus on the relation between conjunction and disjunction and can be seen as the starting point of mixed connectives in statements. This sectioning is not rigorously true, since for instance the section begins with jaao 969 and related theorems.
Theorem	jaao 969	Inference conjoining and disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜒))
Theorem	jaoa 970	Inference disjoining and conjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 1-Nov-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒))
Theorem	jaoian 971	Inference disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	jaodan 972	Deduction disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜒)
Theorem	mpjaodan 973	Eliminate a disjunction in a deduction. A translation of natural deduction rule ∨ E (∨ elimination), see natded 30663. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	pm3.44 974	Theorem *3.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜑)) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜑))
Theorem	jao 975	Disjunction of antecedents. Compare Theorem *3.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	jaob 976	Disjunction of antecedents. Compare Theorem *4.77 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.77 977	Theorem *4.77 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜑))
Theorem	pm3.48 978	Theorem *3.48 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	orim12d 979	Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. See orim12dALT 924 for a proof which does not depend on df-an 401. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)))
Theorem	orim12da 980	Deduce a disjunction from another one. Variation on orim12d 979. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))
Theorem	orim1d 981	Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	orim2d 982	Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orim2 983	Axiom *1.6 (Sum) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.38 984	Theorem *2.38 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)))
Theorem	pm2.36 985	Theorem *2.36 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)))
Theorem	pm2.37 986	Theorem *2.37 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜑) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.81 987	Theorem *2.81 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃))))
Theorem	pm2.8 988	Theorem *2.8 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.73 989	Theorem *2.73 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.74 990	Theorem *2.74 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.82 991	Theorem *2.82 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) → (((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	pm4.39 992	Theorem *4.39 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	animorl 993	Conjunction implies disjunction with one common formula (1/4). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	animorr 994	Conjunction implies disjunction with one common formula (2/4). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	animorlr 995	Conjunction implies disjunction with one common formula (3/4). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	animorrl 996	Conjunction implies disjunction with one common formula (4/4). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	ianor 997	Negated conjunction in terms of disjunction (De Morgan's law). Theorem *4.51 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	anor 998	Conjunction in terms of disjunction (De Morgan's law). Theorem *4.5 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ioran 999	Negated disjunction in terms of conjunction (De Morgan's law). Compare Theorem *4.56 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm4.52 1000	Theorem *4.52 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))