Theorem dfsucon 40231

Description: 𝐴 is called a successor ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal and not the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsucon	⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem dfsucon

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3ancomb 1096	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴))
2		df-3an 1086	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴))
3		df-ne 2988	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)
4	3	anbi2i 625	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅))
5	4	imbi1i 353	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
6		pm5.6 999	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) ↔ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
7		iman 405	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)) ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
8	5, 6, 7	3bitrri 301	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
9		dflim3 7542	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
10	8, 9	xchnxbir 336	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ Lim 𝐴 ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
11	10	anbi2i 625	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
12	1, 2, 11	3bitri 300	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
13		pm3.35 802	. . 3 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
14	12, 13	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
15		eloni 6169	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord 𝑥)
16		ordsuc 7509	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ord 𝑥 ↔ Ord suc 𝑥)
17	15, 16	sylib 221	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord suc 𝑥)
18		nlimsucg 7537	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ¬ Lim suc 𝑥)
19		nsuceq0 6239	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅
20	19	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅)
21	17, 18, 20	3jca 1125	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (Ord suc 𝑥 ∧ ¬ Lim suc 𝑥 ∧ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅))
22		ordeq 6166	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord suc 𝑥))
23		limeq 6171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Lim 𝐴 ↔ Lim suc 𝑥))
24	23	notbid 321	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (¬ Lim 𝐴 ↔ ¬ Lim suc 𝑥))
25		neeq1 3049	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅))
26	22, 24, 25	3anbi123d 1433	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ (Ord suc 𝑥 ∧ ¬ Lim suc 𝑥 ∧ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅)))
27	21, 26	syl5ibrcom 250	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)))
28	27	rexlimiv 3239	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
29	14, 28	impbii 212	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 844   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2987  ∃wrex 3107  ∅c0 4243  Ord word 6158  Oncon0 6159  Lim wlim 6160  suc csuc 6161

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295  ax-un 7441

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-pss 3900  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-tp 4530  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-tr 5137  df-eprel 5430  df-po 5438  df-so 5439  df-fr 5478  df-we 5480  df-ord 6162  df-on 6163  df-lim 6164  df-suc 6165

This theorem is referenced by: (None)