Theorem dfsucon 44063

Description: 𝐴 is called a successor ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal and not the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsucon	⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem dfsucon

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3ancomb 1110	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴))
2		df-3an 1099	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴))
3		df-ne 2957	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)
4	3	anbi2i 632	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅))
5	4	imbi1i 351	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
6		pm5.6 1014	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) ↔ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
7		iman 405	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)) ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
8	5, 6, 7	3bitrri 300	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
9		dflim3 7823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
10	8, 9	xchnxbir 335	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ Lim 𝐴 ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
11	10	anbi2i 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
12	1, 2, 11	3bitri 299	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
13		pm3.35 812	. . 3 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
14	12, 13	sylbi 219	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
15		eloni 6352	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord 𝑥)
16		ordsuc 7790	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ord 𝑥 ↔ Ord suc 𝑥)
17	15, 16	sylib 220	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord suc 𝑥)
18		nlimsuc 43981	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ¬ Lim suc 𝑥)
19		nsuceq0 6427	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅
20	19	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅)
21	17, 18, 20	3jca 1140	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (Ord suc 𝑥 ∧ ¬ Lim suc 𝑥 ∧ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅))
22		ordeq 6349	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord suc 𝑥))
23		limeq 6354	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Lim 𝐴 ↔ Lim suc 𝑥))
24	23	notbid 320	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (¬ Lim 𝐴 ↔ ¬ Lim suc 𝑥))
25		neeq1 3018	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅))
26	22, 24, 25	3anbi123d 1456	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ (Ord suc 𝑥 ∧ ¬ Lim suc 𝑥 ∧ suc 𝑥 ≠ ∅)))
27	21, 26	syl5ibrcom 249	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)))
28	27	rexlimiv 3155	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
29	14, 28	impbii 211	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 858   ∧ w3a 1097   = wceq 1559   ∈ wcel 2141   ≠ wne 2956  ∃wrex 3085  ∅c0 4285  Ord word 6341  Oncon0 6342  Lim wlim 6343  suc csuc 6344

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5245  ax-nul 5255  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3or 1098  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-tr 5207  df-eprel 5545  df-po 5553  df-so 5554  df-fr 5598  df-we 5600  df-ord 6345  df-on 6346  df-lim 6347  df-suc 6348

This theorem is referenced by: (None)