Theorem r19.37zv 4500

Description: Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 8-Oct-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r19.37zv	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem r19.37zv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.35 3106	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
2		r19.3rzv 4497	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
3	2	imbi1d 340	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
4	1, 3	bitr4id 289	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ≠ wne 2938  ∀wral 3059  ∃wrex 3068  ∅c0 4321

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-9 2114  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2701

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2722  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-dif 3950  df-nul 4322

This theorem is referenced by:  ishlat3N  38527  hlsupr2  38561