Theorem rabbieq 3444

Description: Equivalent wff's correspond to restricted class abstractions which are equal with the same class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabbieq.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
rabbieq.2	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbieq	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Proof of Theorem rabbieq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabbieq.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
2		rabbieq.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
3	2	rabbii 3441	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
4	1, 3	eqtri 2764	1 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1539  {crab 3435

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-rab 3436

This theorem is referenced by:  dfdif3  4116  1arithufd  33577  dfrefrels3  38516  dfcnvrefrels3  38531  dfsymrels3  38548  refsymrels3  38568  dftrrels3  38578  dfeqvrels3  38591  dfdisjs3  38712  dfdisjs4  38713  isubgr0uhgr  47864