| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 372 of 512) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31525) |
(31526-33048) |
(33049-51158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | itgeq2sdv 37101* | Equality theorem for an integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq123dv 37102* | Equality theorem for the directed integral. Deduction form. General version of ditgeq3sdv 37104. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐹 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq12d 37103* | Equality theorem for the directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐸 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq3sdv 37104* | Equality theorem for the directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐶 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐷 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | in-ax8 37105 | A proof of ax-8 2146 that does not rely on ax-8 2146. It employs df-in 4091 to perform alpha-renaming and eliminates disjoint variable conditions using ax-9 2154. Since the nature of this result is unclear, usage of this theorem is discouraged, and this method should not be applied to eliminate axiom dependencies. (Contributed by GG, 1-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | ss-ax8 37106 | A proof of ax-8 2146 that does not rely on ax-8 2146. It employs df-ss 3896 to perform alpha-renaming and eliminates disjoint variable conditions using ax-9 2154. Contrary to in-ax8 37105, this proof does not rely on df-cleq 2752, therefore using fewer axioms . This method should not be applied to eliminate axiom dependencies. (Contributed by GG, 30-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvralvw2 37107* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted universal quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrexvw2 37108* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrmovw2 37109* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted at-most-one quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreuvw2 37110* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted existential uniqueness quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbcvw2 37111* | Change bound variable of a class substitution using implicit substitution. General version of cbvsbcvw 3772. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbvw2 37112* | Change bound variable of a proper substitution into a class using implicit substitution. General version of cbvcsbv 3858. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbviunvw2 37113* | Change bound variable and domain in indexed unions, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbviinvw2 37114* | Change bound variable and domain in an indexed intersection, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvmptvw2 37115* | Change bound variable and domain in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvdisjvw2 37116* | Change bound variable and domain in a disjoint collection, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↔ Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotavw2 37117* | Change bound variable and domain in a restricted description binder, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab1vw 37118* | Change the first bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab2vw 37119* | Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab123vw 37120* | Change all bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑢〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab23vw 37121* | Change the second and third bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab13vw 37122* | Change the first and third bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpovw2 37123* | Change bound variables and domains in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo1vw2 37124* | Change domains and the first bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo2vw2 37125* | Change domains and the second bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cbvixpvw2 37126* | Change bound variable and domain in an indexed Cartesian product, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvsumvw2 37127* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a sum, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvprodvw2 37128* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a product, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvitgvw2 37129* | Change bound variable and domain in an integral, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐷 d𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | cbvditgvw2 37130* | Change bound variable and domain in a directed integral, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐹 d𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | cbvmodavw 37131* | Change bound variable in the at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbveudavw 37132* | Change bound variable in the existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrmodavw 37133* | Change bound variable in the restricted at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreudavw 37134* | Change bound variable in the restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbdavw 37135* | Change bound variable in proper substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbdavw2 37136* | Change bound variable in proper substitution. General version of cbvsbdavw 37135. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑤) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvabdavw 37137* | Change bound variable in class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbcdavw 37138* | Change bound variable of a class substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbcdavw2 37139* | Change bound variable of a class substitution. General version of cbvsbcdavw 37138. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbdavw 37140* | Change bound variable of a proper substitution into a class. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbdavw2 37141* | Change bound variable of a proper substitution into a class. General version of cbvcsbdavw 37140. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrabdavw 37142* | Change bound variable in restricted class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbviundavw 37143* | Change bound variable in indexed unions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbviindavw 37144* | Change bound variable in indexed intersections. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvopab1davw 37145* | Change the first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑧, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvopab2davw 37146* | Change the second bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvopabdavw 37147* | Change bound variables in an ordered-pair class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmptdavw 37148* | Change bound variable in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvdisjdavw 37149* | Change bound variable in a disjoint collection. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cbviotadavw 37150* | Change bound variable in a description binder. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotadavw 37151* | Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab1davw 37152* | Change the first bound variable in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab2davw 37153* | Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab3davw 37154* | Change the third bound variable in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑤〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab123davw 37155* | Change all bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑢〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab12davw 37156* | Change the first and second bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑣〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab23davw 37157* | Change the second and third bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab13davw 37158* | Change the first and third bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvixpdavw 37159* | Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsumdavw 37160* | Change bound variable in a sum. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 = 𝑗) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvproddavw 37161* | Change bound variable in a product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑘) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvitgdavw 37162* | Change bound variable in an integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | cbvditgdavw 37163* | Change bound variable in a directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐶 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐷 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrmodavw2 37164* | Change bound variable and quantifier domain in the restricted at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreudavw2 37165* | Change bound variable and quantifier domain in the restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrabdavw2 37166* | Change bound variable and domain in restricted class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbviundavw2 37167* | Change bound variable and domain in indexed unions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbviindavw2 37168* | Change bound variable and domain in indexed intersections. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmptdavw2 37169* | Change bound variable and domain in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvdisjdavw2 37170* | Change bound variable and domain in a disjoint collection. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↔ Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotadavw2 37171* | Change bound variable and domain in a restricted description binder. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpodavw2 37172* | Change bound variable and domains in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo1davw2 37173* | Change first bound variable and domains in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo2davw2 37174* | Change second bound variable and domains in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvixpdavw2 37175* | Change bound variable and domain in an indexed Cartesian product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsumdavw2 37176* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a sum. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑘) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvproddavw2 37177* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑘) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvitgdavw2 37178* | Change bound variable and domain in an integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐷 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | cbvditgdavw2 37179* | Change bound variable and limits in a directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐹 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | mpomulnzcnf 37180* | Multiplication maps nonzero complex numbers to nonzero complex numbers. Version of mulnzcnf 11965 using maps-to notation, which does not require ax-mulf 11283. (Contributed by GG, 18-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)):((ℂ ∖ {0}) × (ℂ ∖ {0}))⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) | ||
| Theorem | a1i14 37181 | Add two antecedents to a wff. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
| Theorem | a1i24 37182 | Add two antecedents to a wff. Deduction associated with a1i13 28. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
| Theorem | exp5d 37183 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp5g 37184 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp5k 37185 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp56 37186 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp58 37187 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp510 37188 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp511 37189 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp512 37190 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | 3com12d 37191 | Commutation in consequent. Swap 1st and 2nd. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | imp5p 37192 | A triple importation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 8-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | imp5q 37193 | A triple importation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 8-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) | ||
| Theorem | subtr 37194 | Transitivity of implicit substitution. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑌 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑍 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝑋 = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝑌 = 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | subtr2 37195 | Transitivity of implicit substitution into a wff. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 19-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | trer 37196* | A relation intersected with its converse is an equivalence relation if the relation is transitive. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 6-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑎∀𝑏∀𝑐((𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑐) → 𝑎 ≤ 𝑐) → ( ≤ ∩ ◡ ≤ ) Er dom ( ≤ ∩ ◡ ≤ )) | ||
| Theorem | elicc3 37197 | An equivalent membership condition for closed intervals. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 14-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 < 𝐵) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | finminlem 37198* | A useful lemma about finite sets. If a property holds for a finite set, it holds for a minimal set. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Dec-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ Fin 𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | gtinf 37199* | Any number greater than an infimum is greater than some element of the set. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) < 𝐴)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | opnrebl 37200* | A set is open in the standard topology of the reals precisely when every point can be enclosed in an open ball. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 23-Sep-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (topGen‘ran (,)) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ((𝑥 − 𝑦)(,)(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |