Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 372 of 462) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28971) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28972-30494) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30495-46134) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | hlatexchb1 37101 | A version of hlexchb1 37092 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | hlatexchb2 37102 | A version of hlexchb2 37093 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch1 37103 | Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch2 37104 | Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | hlatmstcOLDN 37105* | An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 30415 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | hlatle 37106* | The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 30424 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | hlateq 37107* | The equality of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat4i 30426 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat1 37108* | An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 30416, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat5N 37109* | An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic, using the definition in Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat 37110* | A Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 30417 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat2 37111* | A consequence of relative atomicity. (chrelat2i 30418 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | exatleN 37112 | A condition for an atom to be less than or equal to a lattice element. Part of proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑅 = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | hl2at 37113* | A Hilbert lattice has at least 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) | ||
Theorem | atex 37114 | At least one atom exists. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | intnatN 37115 | If the intersection with a non-majorizing element is an atom, the intersecting element is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 2llnne2N 37116 | Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | 2llnneN 37117 | Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cvr1 37118 | A Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 30408 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | cvr2N 37119 | Less-than and covers equivalence in a Hilbert lattice. (chcv2 30409 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat3 37120* | The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Stronger version of hlrelat 37110. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | cvrval3 37121* | Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvrval4N 37122* | Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvrval5 37123* | Binary relation expressing 𝑋 covers 𝑋 ∧ 𝑌. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑋 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | cvrp 37124 | A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 30428 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | atcvr1 37125 | An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | atcvr2 37126 | An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | cvrexchlem 37127 | Lemma for cvrexch 37128. (cvexchlem 30421 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvrexch 37128 | A Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (cvexchi 30422 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvratlem 37129 | Lemma for cvrat 37130. (atcvatlem 30438 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (¬ 𝑃(le‘𝐾)𝑋 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cvrat 37130 | A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (atcvati 30439 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | ltltncvr 37131 | A chained strong ordering is not a covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | ltcvrntr 37132 | Non-transitive condition for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | cvrntr 37133 | The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 30345 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | atcvr0eq 37134 | The covers relation is not transitive. (atcv0eq 30432 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ( 0 𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | lnnat 37135 | A line (the join of two distinct atoms) is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj0 37136 | Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (atcv1 30433 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 = 0 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cvrat2 37137 | A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (atcvat2i 30440 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | atcvrneN 37138 | Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj1 37139 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj2b 37140 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj2 37141 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | atleneN 37142 | Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | atltcvr 37143 | An equivalence of less-than ordering and covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | atle 37144* | Any nonzero element has an atom under it. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | atlt 37145 | Two atoms are unequal iff their join is greater than one of them. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.) |
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | atlelt 37146 | Transfer less-than relation from one atom to another. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 < 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | 2atlt 37147* | Given an atom less than an element, there is another atom less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 < 𝑋) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑞 < 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | atexchcvrN 37148 | Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 37104 with covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | atexchltN 37149 | Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 37104 with less-than ordering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | cvrat3 37150 | A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (atcvat3i 30449 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cvrat4 37151* | A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 in [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Also Lemma 9.2(delta) in [MaedaMaeda] p. 41. (atcvat4i 30450 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) | ||
Theorem | cvrat42 37152* | Commuted version of cvrat4 37151. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑄)))) | ||
Theorem | 2atjm 37153 | The meet of a line (expressed with 2 atoms) and a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | atbtwn 37154 | Property of a 3rd atom 𝑅 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ↔ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | atbtwnexOLDN 37155* | There exists a 3rd atom 𝑟 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃, such that 𝑟 is different from 𝑄 and not in 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | atbtwnex 37156* | Given atoms 𝑃 in 𝑋 and 𝑄 not in 𝑋, there exists an atom 𝑟 not in 𝑋 such that the line 𝑄 ∨ 𝑟 intersects 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3noncolr2 37157 | Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3noncolr1N 37158 | Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | hlatcon3 37159 | Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | hlatcon2 37160 | Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | 4noncolr3 37161 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 3 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | 4noncolr2 37162 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | 4noncolr1 37163 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑆 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | athgt 37164* | A Hilbert lattice, whose height is at least 4, has a chain of 4 successively covering atom joins. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝𝐶(𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)𝐶(((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∨ 𝑠)))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim0 37165* | There exists a 3-dimensional (height-4) element i.e. a volume. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem1 37166 | Lemma for 3dim1 37175. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem2 37167 | Lemma for 3dim1 37175. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem3a 37168 | Lemma for 3dim3 37177. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem3 37169 | Lemma for 3dim1 37175. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem3OLDN 37170 | Lemma for 3dim1 37175. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem4a 37171 | Lemma for 3dim3 37177. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem4 37172 | Lemma for 3dim1 37175. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem4OLDN 37173 | Lemma for 3dim1 37175. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim1lem5 37174* | Lemma for 3dim1 37175. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ ¬ 𝑤 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∨ 𝑣))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim1 37175* | Construct a 3-dimensional volume (height-4 element) on top of a given atom 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim2 37176* | Construct 2 new layers on top of 2 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim3 37177* | Construct a new layer on top of 3 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 2dim 37178* | Generate a height-3 element (2-dimensional plane) from an atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 1dimN 37179* | An atom is covered by a height-2 element (1-dimensional line). (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)) | ||
Theorem | 1cvrco 37180 | The orthocomplement of an element covered by 1 is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶 1 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | 1cvratex 37181* | There exists an atom less than an element covered by 1. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 < 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | 1cvratlt 37182 | An atom less than or equal to an element covered by 1 is less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | 1cvrjat 37183 | An element covered by the lattice unit, when joined with an atom not under it, equals the lattice unit. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = 1 ) | ||
Theorem | 1cvrat 37184 | Create an atom under an element covered by the lattice unit. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ps-1 37185 | The join of two atoms 𝑅 ∨ 𝑆 (specifying a projective geometry line) is determined uniquely by any two atoms (specifying two points) less than or equal to that join. Part of Lemma 16.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 69, showing projective space postulate PS1 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | ps-2 37186* | Lattice analogue for the projective geometry axiom, "if a line intersects two sides of a triangle at different points then it also intersects the third side." Projective space condition PS2 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 68 and part of Theorem 16.4 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇))) | ||
Theorem | 2atjlej 37187 | Two atoms are different if their join majorizes the join of two different atoms. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch3N 37188 | Rearrange join of atoms in an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch4 37189 | Exchange 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | ps-2b 37190 | Variation of projective geometry axiom ps-2 37186. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem1 37191 | Lemma for 3at 37198. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem2 37192 | Lemma for 3at 37198. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem3 37193 | Lemma for 3at 37198. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem4 37194 | Lemma for 3at 37198. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem5 37195 | Lemma for 3at 37198. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem6 37196 | Lemma for 3at 37198. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem7 37197 | Lemma for 3at 37198. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3at 37198 | Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 37185 for lines and 4at 37321 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))) | ||
Syntax | clln 37199 | Extend class notation with set of all "lattice lines" (lattice elements which cover an atom) in a Hilbert lattice. |
class LLines | ||
Syntax | clpl 37200 | Extend class notation with set of all "lattice planes" (lattice elements which cover a line) in a Hilbert lattice. |
class LPlanes |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |