P. 372 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 37101-37200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	ctopmgmhom 37101	Syntax for the set of topological magma morphisms.
class TopMgm⟶
Definition	df-bj-topmgmhom 37102*	Define the set of topological magma morphisms (continuous magma morphisms) between two topological magmas. If domain and codomain are topological semigroups, monoids, or groups, then one obtains the set of morphisms of these structures. This definition is currently stated with topological monoid domain and codomain, since topological magmas are currently not defined in set.mm. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Feb-2022.)
⊢ TopMgm⟶ = (𝑥 ∈ TopMnd, 𝑦 ∈ TopMnd ↦ ((𝑥 Top⟶ 𝑦) ∩ (𝑥 Mgm⟶ 𝑦)))
Syntax	ccur- 37103	Syntax for the parameterized currying function.
class curry_
Definition	df-bj-cur 37104*	Define currying. See also df-cur 8207. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ curry_ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((𝑥 × 𝑦) Set⟶ 𝑧) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ (𝑓‘⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)))))
Syntax	cunc- 37105	Notation for the parameterized uncurrying function.
class uncurry_
Definition	df-bj-unc 37106*	Define uncurrying. See also df-unc 8208. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ uncurry_ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥 Set⟶ (𝑦 Set⟶ 𝑧)) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑥, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑎)‘𝑏))))
21.19.5.25  Setting components of extensible structures Groundwork for changing the definition, syntax and token for component-setting in extensible structures. See https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2401
Syntax	cstrset 37107	Syntax for component-setting in extensible structures.
class [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆
Definition	df-strset 37108	Component-setting in extensible structures. Define the extensible structure [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆, which is like the extensible structure 𝑆 except that the value 𝐵 has been put in the slot 𝐴 (replacing the current value if there was already one). In such expressions, 𝐴 is generally substituted for slot mnemonics like Base or +g or dist. The V in this definition was chosen to be closer to df-sets 17093, but since extensible structures are functions on ℕ, it will be more natural to replace it with ℕ when df-strset 37108 becomes the main definition. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆 = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {(𝐴‘ndx)})) ∪ {⟨(𝐴‘ndx), 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	setsstrset 37109	Relation between df-sets 17093 and df-strset 37108. Temporary theorem kept during the transition from the former to the latter. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨(𝐴‘ndx), 𝐵⟩))
21.19.6  Extended real and complex numbers, real and complex projective lines In this section, we indroduce several supersets of the set ℝ of real numbers and the set ℂ of complex numbers. Once they are given their usual topologies, which are locally compact, both topological spaces have a one-point compactification. They are denoted by ℝ̂ and ℂ̂ respectively, defined in df-bj-cchat 37206 and df-bj-rrhat 37208, and the point at infinity is denoted by ∞, defined in df-bj-infty 37204. Both ℝ and ℂ also have "directional compactifications", denoted respectively by ℝ̅, defined in df-bj-rrbar 37202 (already defined as ℝ*, see df-xr 11172) and ℂ̅, defined in df-bj-ccbar 37189. Since ℂ̅ does not seem to be standard, we describe it in some detail. It is obtained by adding to ℂ a "point at infinity at the end of each ray with origin at 0". Although ℂ̅ is not an important object in itself, the motivation for introducing it is to provide a common superset to both ℝ̅ and ℂ and to define algebraic operations (addition, opposite, multiplication, inverse) as widely as reasonably possible. Mathematically, ℂ̅ is the quotient of ((ℂ × ℝ≥0) ∖ {⟨0, 0⟩}) by the diagonal multiplicative action of ℝ>0 (think of the closed "northern hemisphere" in ℝ^3 identified with (ℂ × ℝ), that each open ray from 0 included in the closed northern half-space intersects exactly once). Since in set.mm, we want to have a genuine inclusion ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅, we instead define ℂ̅ as the (disjoint) union of ℂ with a circle at infinity denoted by ℂ∞. To have a genuine inclusion ℝ̅ ⊆ ℂ̅, we define +∞ and -∞ as certain points in ℂ∞. Thanks to this framework, one has the genuine inclusions ℝ ⊆ ℝ̅ and ℝ ⊆ ℝ̂ and similarly ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅ and ℂ ⊆ ℂ̂. Furthermore, one has ℝ ⊆ ℂ as well as ℝ̅ ⊆ ℂ̅ and ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂. Furthermore, we define the main algebraic operations on (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂), which is not very mathematical, but "overloads" the operations, so that one can use the same notation in all cases.
21.19.6.1  Complements on class abstractions of ordered pairs and binary relations
Theorem	bj-nfald 37110	Variant of nfald 2327. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	bj-nfexd 37111	Variant of nfexd 2328. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	copsex2d 37112*	Implicit substitution deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	copsex2b 37113*	Biconditional form of copsex2d 37112. TODO: prove a relative version, that is, with ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊...(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	opelopabd 37114*	Membership of an ordere pair in a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	opelopabb 37115*	Membership of an ordered pair in a class abstraction of ordered pairs, biconditional form. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	opelopabbv 37116*	Membership of an ordered pair in a class abstraction of ordered pairs, biconditional form. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	bj-opelrelex 37117	The coordinates of an ordered pair that belongs to a relation are sets. TODO: Slightly shorter than brrelex12 5675, which could be proved from it. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-opelresdm 37118	If an ordered pair is in a restricted binary relation, then its first component is an element of the restricting class. See also opelres 5940. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝑅 ↾ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	bj-brresdm 37119	If two classes are related by a restricted binary relation, then the first class is an element of the restricting class. See also brres 5941 and brrelex1 5676. Remark: there are many pairs like bj-opelresdm 37118 / bj-brresdm 37119, where one uses membership of ordered pairs and the other, related classes (for instance, bj-opelresdm 37118 / brrelex12 5675 or the opelopabg 5485 / brabg 5486 family). They are straightforwardly equivalent by df-br 5096. The latter is indeed a very direct definition, introducing a "shorthand", and barely necessary, were it not for the frequency of the expression 𝐴𝑅𝐵. Therefore, in the spirit of "definitions are here to be used", most theorems, apart from the most elementary ones, should only have the "br" version, not the "opel" one. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ↾ 𝑋)𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	brabd0 37120*	Expressing that two sets are related by a binary relation which is expressed as a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	brabd 37121*	Expressing that two sets are related by a binary relation which is expressed as a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	bj-brab2a1 37122*	"Unbounded" version of brab2a 5716. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜓))
21.19.6.2  Identity relation (complements) Complements on the identity relation.
Theorem	bj-opabssvv 37123*	A variant of relopabiv 5767 (which could be proved from it, similarly to relxp 5641 from xpss 5639). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Dec-2023.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ (V × V)
Theorem	bj-funidres 37124	The restricted identity relation is a function. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) TODO: relabel funi 6518 to funid.
⊢ Fun ( I ↾ 𝑉)
Theorem	bj-opelidb 37125	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation. Remark: in deduction-style proofs, one could save a few syntactic steps by using another antecedent than ⊤ which already appears in the proof. Here for instance this could be the definition I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦} but this would make the proof less easy to read. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelidb1 37126	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation. Variant of bj-opelidb 37125 where only the sethood of the first component is expressed. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-inexeqex 37127	Lemma for bj-opelid 37129 (but not specific to the identity relation): if the intersection of two classes is a set and the two classes are equal, then both are sets (all three classes are equal, so they all belong to 𝑉, but it is more convenient to have V in the consequent for theorems using it). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-elsn0 37128	If the intersection of two classes is a set, then these classes are equal if and only if one is an element of the singleton formed on the other. Stronger form of elsng 4593 and elsn2g 4618 (which could be proved from it). (Contributed by BJ, 20-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelid 37129	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation when the intersection of their components are sets. Note that the antecedent is more general than either component being a set. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg 37130	Characterization of the classes related by the identity relation when their intersection is a set. Note that the antecedent is more general than either class being a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) Weaken the antecedent to sethood of the intersection. (Revised by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.) TODO: replace ideqg 5798, or at least prove ideqg 5798 from it.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqgALT 37131	Alternate proof of bj-ideqg 37130 from brabga 5481 instead of bj-opelid 37129 itself proved from bj-opelidb 37125. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqb 37132	Characterization of classes related by the identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idres 37133	Alternate expression for the restricted identity relation. The advantage of that expression is to expose it as a "bounded" class, being included in the Cartesian square of the restricting class. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) This is an alternate of idinxpresid 6003 (see idinxpres 6002). See also elrid 6001 and elidinxp 5999. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-opelidres 37134	Characterization of the ordered pairs in the restricted identity relation when the intersection of their component belongs to the restricting class. TODO: prove bj-idreseq 37135 from it. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑉) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idreseq 37135	Sufficient condition for the restricted identity relation to agree with equality. Note that the instance of bj-ideqg 37130 with V substituted for 𝑉 is a direct consequence of bj-idreseq 37135. This is a strengthening of resieq 5945 which should be proved from it (note that currently, resieq 5945 relies on ideq 5799). Note that the intersection in the antecedent is not very meaningful, but is a device to prove versions with either class assumed to be a set. It could be enough to prove the version with a disjunctive antecedent: ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ...). (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idreseqb 37136	Characterization for two classes to be related under the restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg1 37137	For sets, the identity relation is the same thing as equality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalize to a disjunctive antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.) TODO: delete once bj-ideqg 37130 is in the main section.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg1ALT 37138	Alternate proof of bj-ideqg1 using brabga 5481 instead of the "unbounded" version bj-brab2a1 37122 or brab2a 5716. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) TODO: delete once bj-ideqg 37130 is in the main section.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelidb1ALT 37139	Characterization of the couples in I. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-elid3 37140	Characterization of the couples in I whose first component is a setvar. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝐴⟩ ∈ I ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-elid4 37141	Characterization of the elements of I. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-elid5 37142	Characterization of the elements of I. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (1st ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-elid6 37143	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (1st ‘𝐵) = (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-elid7 37144	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
21.19.6.3  Functionalized identity (diagonal in a Cartesian square) This subsection defines a functionalized version of the identity relation, that can also be seen as the diagonal in a Cartesian square). As explained in df-bj-diag 37146, it will probably be deleted.
Syntax	cdiag2 37145	Syntax for the diagonal of the Cartesian square of a set.
class Id
Definition	df-bj-diag 37146	Define the functionalized identity, which can also be seen as the diagonal function. Its value is given in bj-diagval 37147 when it is viewed as the functionalized identity, and in bj-diagval2 37148 when it is viewed as the diagonal function. Indeed, Definition df-br 5096 identifies a binary relation with the class of couples that are related by that binary relation (see eqrel2 38272 for the extensionality property of binary relations). As a consequence, the identity relation, or identity function (see funi 6518), on any class, can alternatively be seen as the diagonal of the cartesian square of that class. The identity relation on the universal class, I, is an "identity relation generator", since its restriction to any class is the identity relation on that class. It may be useful to consider a functionalized version of that fact, and that is the purpose of df-bj-diag 37146. Note: most proofs will only use its values (Id‘𝐴), in which case it may be enough to use ( I ↾ 𝐴) everywhere and dispense with this definition. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Id = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ( I ↾ 𝑥))
Theorem	bj-diagval 37147	Value of the functionalized identity, or equivalently of the diagonal function. This expression views it as the functionalized identity, whereas bj-diagval2 37148 views it as the diagonal function. See df-bj-diag 37146 for the terminology. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Id‘𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-diagval2 37148	Value of the functionalized identity, or equivalently of the diagonal function. This expression views it as the diagonal function, whereas bj-diagval 37147 views it as the functionalized identity. See df-bj-diag 37146 for the terminology. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Id‘𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-eldiag 37149	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. Subsumed by bj-elid6 37143. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (Id‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (1st ‘𝐵) = (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	bj-eldiag2 37150	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. Subsumed by bj-elid7 37144. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ (Id‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
21.19.6.4  Direct image and inverse image Definitions of the functionalized direct image and inverse image. The functionalized direct (resp. inverse) image is the morphism component of the covariant (resp. contravariant) powerset endofunctor of the category of sets and relations (and, up to restriction, of its subcategory of sets and functions). Its object component is the powerset operation 𝒫 defined in df-pw 4555.
Syntax	cimdir 37151	Syntax for the functionalized direct image.
class 𝒫*
Definition	df-imdir 37152*	Definition of the functionalized direct image, which maps a binary relation between two given sets to its associated direct image relation. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝒫* = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ (𝑟 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirvallem 37153*	Lemma for bj-imdirval 37154 and bj-iminvval 37166. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ 𝜓)}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐶𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirval 37154*	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝒫*𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑟 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirval2lem 37155*	Lemma for bj-imdirval2 37156 and bj-iminvval2 37167. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-imdirval2 37156*	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)})
Theorem	bj-imdirval3 37157	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅 “ 𝑋) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	bj-imdiridlem 37158*	Lemma for bj-imdirid 37159 and bj-iminvid 37168. (Contributed by BJ, 26-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)} = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-imdirid 37159	Functorial property of the direct image: the direct image by the identity on a set is the identity on the powerset. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐴)‘( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-opelopabid 37160*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction. One can remove the DV condition on 𝑥, 𝑦 by using opabid 5472 in place of opabidw 5471. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	bj-opabco 37161*	Composition of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∘ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	bj-xpcossxp 37162	The composition of two Cartesian products is included in the expected Cartesian product. There is equality if (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅, see xpcogend 14899. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐷)
Theorem	bj-imdirco 37163	Functorial property of the direct image: the direct image by a composition is the composition of the direct images. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐶)‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑅)) = (((𝐵𝒫*𝐶)‘𝑆) ∘ ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅)))
Syntax	ciminv 37164	Syntax for the functionalized inverse image.
class 𝒫*
Definition	df-iminv 37165*	Definition of the functionalized inverse image, which maps a binary relation between two given sets to its associated inverse image relation. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝒫* = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))}))
Theorem	bj-iminvval 37166*	Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝒫*𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))}))
Theorem	bj-iminvval2 37167*	Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑅 “ 𝑦))})
Theorem	bj-iminvid 37168	Functorial property of the inverse image: the inverse image by the identity on a set is the identity on the powerset. (Contributed by BJ, 26-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐴)‘( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴))
21.19.6.5  Extended numbers and projective lines as sets We parameterize the set of infinite extended complex numbers ℂ∞ (df-bj-ccinfty 37185) using the real numbers ℝ (df-r 11038) via the function +∞eiτ. Since at that point, we have only defined the set of real numbers but no operations on it, we define a temporary "fractional part" function, which is more convenient to define on the temporary reals R (df-nr 10969) since we can use operations on the latter. We also define the temporary real "one-half" in order to define minus infinity (df-bj-minfty 37197) and then we can define the sets of extended real numbers and of extended complex numbers, and the projective real and complex lines, as well as addition and negation on these, and also the order relation on the extended reals (which bypasses the intermediate definition of a temporary order on the real numbers and then a superseding one on the extended real numbers).
Syntax	cfractemp 37169	Syntax for the fractional part of a temporary real.
class {R
Definition	df-bj-fractemp 37170*	Temporary definition: fractional part of a temporary real. To understand this definition, recall the canonical injection ω⟶R, 𝑛 ↦ [{𝑥 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑥 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P] ~R where we successively take the successor of 𝑛 to land in positive integers, then take the couple with 1o as second component to land in positive rationals, then take the Dedekind cut that positive rational forms, and finally take the equivalence class of the couple with 1P as second component. Adding one at the beginning and subtracting it at the end is necessary since the constructions used in set.mm use the positive integers, positive rationals, and positive reals as intermediate number systems. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. One could even inline it. The definitive fractional part of an extended or projective complex number will be defined later. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {R = (𝑥 ∈ R ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ R ((𝑦 = 0R ∨ (0R <R 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 <R 1R)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ([⟨{𝑧 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑧 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P⟩] ~R +R 𝑦) = 𝑥)))
Syntax	cinftyexpitau 37171	Syntax for the function +∞eiτ parameterizing ℂ∞.
class +∞eiτ
Definition	df-bj-inftyexpitau 37172	Definition of the auxiliary function +∞eiτ parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with {R} to simplify the proof of bj-inftyexpitaudisj 37178. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. TODO: prove only the necessary lemmas to prove ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((+∞eiτ‘𝐴) = (+∞eiτ‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ)). (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞eiτ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⟨({R‘(1st ‘𝑥)), {R}⟩)
Syntax	cccinftyN 37173	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞N.
class ℂ∞N
Definition	df-bj-ccinftyN 37174	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞N. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞N = ran +∞eiτ
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaufo 37175	The function +∞eiτ written as a surjection with domain and range. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ +∞eiτ:ℝ–onto→ℂ∞N
Syntax	chalf 37176	Syntax for the temporary one-half.
class 1/2
Definition	df-bj-onehalf 37177	Define the temporary real "one-half". Once the machinery is developed, the real number "one-half" is commonly denoted by (1 / 2). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) TODO: $p |- 1/2 e. R. $= ? $. (riotacl 7327) $p |- -. 0R = 1/2 $= ? $. (since -. ( 0R +R 0R ) = 1R ) $p |- 0R <R 1/2 $= ? $. $p |- 1/2 <R 1R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 0R ) = 0R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 1/2 ) = 1/2 $= ? $. df-minfty $a |- minfty = ( inftyexpitau ` <. 1/2 , 0R >. ) $.
⊢ 1/2 = (℩𝑥 ∈ R (𝑥 +R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaudisj 37178	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞eiτ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cinftyexpi 37179	Syntax for the function +∞ei parameterizing ℂ∞.
class +∞ei
Definition	df-bj-inftyexpi 37180	Definition of the auxiliary function +∞ei parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with ℂ to simplify the proof of bj-ccinftydisj 37186. It could seem more natural to define +∞ei on all of ℝ, but we want to use only basic functions in the definition of ℂ̅. TODO: transition to df-bj-inftyexpitau 37172 instead. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞ei = (𝑥 ∈ (-π(,]π) ↦ ⟨𝑥, ℂ⟩)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinv 37181	Utility theorem for the inverse of +∞ei. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (1st ‘(+∞ei‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinj 37182	Injectivity of the parameterization +∞ei. Remark: a more conceptual proof would use bj-inftyexpiinv 37181 and the fact that a function with a retraction is injective. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (-π(,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (+∞ei‘𝐴) = (+∞ei‘𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-inftyexpidisj 37183	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cccinfty 37184	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞.
class ℂ∞
Definition	df-bj-ccinfty 37185	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞ = ran +∞ei
Theorem	bj-ccinftydisj 37186	The circle at infinity is disjoint from the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (ℂ ∩ ℂ∞) = ∅
Theorem	bj-elccinfty 37187	A lemma for infinite extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ∞)
Syntax	cccbar 37188	Syntax for the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅.
class ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-ccbar 37189	Definition of the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̅ = (ℂ ∪ ℂ∞)
Theorem	bj-ccssccbar 37190	Complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-ccinftyssccbar 37191	Infinite extended complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ∞ ⊆ ℂ̅
Syntax	cpinfty 37192	Syntax for "plus infinity".
class +∞
Definition	df-bj-pinfty 37193	Definition of "plus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ = (+∞ei‘0)
Theorem	bj-pinftyccb 37194	The class +∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-pinftynrr 37195	The extended complex number +∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cminfty 37196	Syntax for "minus infinity".
class -∞
Definition	df-bj-minfty 37197	Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π)
Theorem	bj-minftyccb 37198	The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-minftynrr 37199	The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	bj-pinftynminfty 37200	The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞