Theorem rabeqbidva 3411

Description: Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqbidva.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
rabeqbidva.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabeqbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqbidva.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rabbidva 3402	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
3		rabeqbidva.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
4	3	rabeqdv 3409	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
5	2, 4	eqtrd 2778	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3067

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-rab 3072

This theorem is referenced by:  natpropd  17610  gsumpropd2lem  18278  elntg  27255  rmfsupp2  31394  poimirlem28  35732  scotteqd  41744  domnmsuppn0  45593  eenglngeehlnm  45973