![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabeqbidva | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) Remove DV conditions. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqbidva.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
rabeqbidva.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqbidva | ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rabeqbidva.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
2 | 1 | rabbidva 3450 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒}) |
3 | rabeqbidva.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | |
4 | 3 | eleq2d 2830 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
5 | 4 | anbi1d 630 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))) |
6 | 5 | rabbidva2 3445 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}) |
7 | 2, 6 | eqtrd 2780 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2108 {crab 3443 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2711 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1778 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-rab 3444 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabeqbidv 3462 natpropd 18046 gsumpropd2lem 18717 elntg 29017 rmfsupp2 33218 poimirlem28 37608 scotteqd 44206 uspgrlimlem1 47812 domnmsuppn0 48094 eenglngeehlnm 48473 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |