Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ralnralall Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ralnralall 4416
 Description: A contradiction concerning restricted generalization for a nonempty set implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ralnralall (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ralnralall
StepHypRef Expression
1 r19.26 3137 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 ¬ 𝜑))
2 pm3.24 406 . . . . 5 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
32bifal 1554 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ⊥)
43ralbii 3133 . . 3 (∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴 ⊥)
5 r19.3rzv 4402 . . . 4 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⊥ ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴 ⊥))
6 falim 1555 . . . 4 (⊥ → 𝜓)
75, 6syl6bir 257 . . 3 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥𝐴 ⊥ → 𝜓))
84, 7syl5bi 245 . 2 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
91, 8syl5bir 246 1 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399  ⊥wfal 1550   ≠ wne 2987  ∀wral 3106  ∅c0 4243 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-tru 1541  df-fal 1551  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-dif 3884  df-nul 4244 This theorem is referenced by: (None)
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator