Theorem rp-fakeuninass 44270

Description: A special case where a mixture of union and intersection appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rp-fakeuninass	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem rp-fakeuninass

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rp-fakeinunass 44269	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)))
2		eqcom 2769	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴))
3		incom 4161	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐶)
4		uncom 4111	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
5	4	ineq1i 4168	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)
6	3, 5	eqtri 2785	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)
7		uncom 4111	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))
8		incom 4161	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)
9	8	uneq2i 4118	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
10	7, 9	eqtri 2785	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
11	6, 10	eqeq12i 2780	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
12	1, 2, 11	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∪ cun 3902   ∩ cin 3903   ⊆ wss 3904

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921

This theorem is used by: (None)