| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 431 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31307) |
(31308-32830) |
(32831-50694) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | indstrd 43001* | Strong induction, deduction version. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 13-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜒)) → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | grpods 43002* | Relate sums of elements of orders and roots of unity. (Contributed by metakunt, 14-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ 𝑚 ∥ 𝑁} (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ((od‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = 𝑘}) = (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑁 ↑ 𝑥) = (0g‘𝐺)})) | ||
| Theorem | unitscyglem1 43003* | Lemma for unitscyg . (Contributed by metakunt, 13-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑛 ↑ 𝑥) = (0g‘𝐺)}) ≤ 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (((od‘𝐺)‘𝐴) ↑ 𝑥) = (0g‘𝐺)}) = ((od‘𝐺)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | unitscyglem2 43004* | Lemma for unitscyg . (Contributed by metakunt, 13-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑛 ↑ 𝑥) = (0g‘𝐺)}) ≤ 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∥ (♯‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((od‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑐 ∈ ℕ (𝑐 < 𝐷 → ((𝑐 ∥ (♯‘𝐵) ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ((od‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = 𝑐} ≠ ∅) → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ((od‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = 𝑐}) = (ϕ‘𝑐)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ((od‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = 𝐷}) = (ϕ‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | unitscyglem3 43005* | Lemma for unitscyg . (Contributed by metakunt, 14-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑛 ↑ 𝑥) = (0g‘𝐺)}) ≤ 𝑛) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑑 ∈ ℕ ((𝑑 ∥ (♯‘𝐵) ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ((od‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = 𝑑} ≠ ∅) → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ((od‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = 𝑑}) = (ϕ‘𝑑))) | ||
| Theorem | unitscyglem4 43006* | Lemma for unitscyg . (Contributed by metakunt, 14-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑛 ↑ 𝑥) = (0g‘𝐺)}) ≤ 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∥ (♯‘𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ((od‘𝐺)‘𝑦) = 𝐷}) = (ϕ‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | unitscyglem5 43007 | Lemma for unitscyg . (Contributed by metakunt, 9-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = ((mulGrp‘𝑅) ↾s (Unit‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝑅) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∥ (♯‘(Base‘𝐺))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((mulGrp‘𝑅) PrimRoots 𝐷) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | aks5lem7 43008* | Lemma for aks5. We clean up the hypotheses compared to aks5lem6 43000. (Contributed by metakunt, 9-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(Base‘𝐾)) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (chr‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 1) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (⌊‘((√‘(ϕ‘𝑅)) · (2 logb 𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 logb 𝑁)↑2) < ((odℤ‘𝑅)‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∥ ((♯‘(Base‘𝐾)) − 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ (1...𝐴)[(𝑁(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))(𝑋(+g‘𝑆)((ℤRHom‘𝑆)‘𝑎)))](𝑆 ~QG 𝐿) = [((𝑁(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))𝑋)(+g‘𝑆)((ℤRHom‘𝑆)‘𝑎))](𝑆 ~QG 𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...𝐴)(𝑏 gcd 𝑁) = 1) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Poly1‘(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((RSpan‘𝑆)‘{((𝑅(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))𝑋)(-g‘𝑆)(1r‘𝑆))}) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | aks5lem8 43009* | Lemma for aks5. Clean up the conclusion. (Contributed by metakunt, 9-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(Base‘𝐾)) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (chr‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 1) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (⌊‘((√‘(ϕ‘𝑅)) · (2 logb 𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 logb 𝑁)↑2) < ((odℤ‘𝑅)‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∥ ((♯‘(Base‘𝐾)) − 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ (1...𝐴)[(𝑁(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))(𝑋(+g‘𝑆)((ℤRHom‘𝑆)‘𝑎)))](𝑆 ~QG 𝐿) = [((𝑁(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))𝑋)(+g‘𝑆)((ℤRHom‘𝑆)‘𝑎))](𝑆 ~QG 𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...𝐴)(𝑏 gcd 𝑁) = 1) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Poly1‘(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((RSpan‘𝑆)‘{((𝑅(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))𝑋)(-g‘𝑆)(1r‘𝑆))}) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑁 = (𝑝↑𝑛)) | ||
| Axiom | ax-exfinfld 43010* | Existence axiom for finite fields, eventually we want to construct them. (Contributed by metakunt, 13-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑘 ∈ Field ((♯‘(Base‘𝑘)) = (𝑝↑𝑛) ∧ (chr‘𝑘) = 𝑝) | ||
| Theorem | exfinfldd 43011* | For any prime 𝑃 and any positive integer 𝑁 there exists a field 𝑘 such that 𝑘 contains 𝑃↑𝑁 elements. (Contributed by metakunt, 13-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ Field ((♯‘(Base‘𝑘)) = (𝑃↑𝑁) ∧ (chr‘𝑘) = 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | aks5 43012* | The AKS Primality test, given an integer 𝑁 greater than or equal to 3, find a coprime 𝑅 such that 𝑅 is big enough. Then, if a bunch of polynomial equalities in the residue ring hold then 𝑁 is a prime power. Currently depends on the axiom ax-exfinfld 43010, since we currently do not have the existence of finite fields in the database. (Contributed by metakunt, 16-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (⌊‘((√‘(ϕ‘𝑅)) · (2 logb 𝑁))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Poly1‘(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((RSpan‘𝑆)‘{((𝑅(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))𝑋)(-g‘𝑆)(1r‘𝑆))}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 logb 𝑁)↑2) < ((odℤ‘𝑅)‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ (1...𝐴)[(𝑁(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))(𝑋(+g‘𝑆)((ℤRHom‘𝑆)‘𝑎)))](𝑆 ~QG 𝐿) = [((𝑁(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))𝑋)(+g‘𝑆)((ℤRHom‘𝑆)‘𝑎))](𝑆 ~QG 𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ (1...𝐴)(𝑎 gcd 𝑁) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑁 = (𝑝↑𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | quadfac 43013 | The solution of a quadratic equation via factoring. (Contributed by Luke Murphy, 10-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 + 𝑁) = -(𝐵 / 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑁) = (𝐶 / 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 · (𝑋↑2)) + ((𝐵 · 𝑋) + 𝐶)) = 0 ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | 25or6to4 43014 | Question 67 of 68 from a lecture Prof. Loof Lirpa held last Saturday in Lincoln Park. When asked why the smaller root wasn't reduced to 3/2, Lirpa responded "It really doesn't matter anyhow." (Contributed by Luke Murphy, 10-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = -(;53 / 2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (;75 / 2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 · (𝑋↑2)) + ((𝐵 · 𝑋) + 𝐶)) = 0 ↔ (𝑋 = ;25 ∨ 𝑋 = (6 / 4)))) | ||
| Theorem | jarrii 43015 | Inference associated with jarri 108. A consequence of ax-mp 5 and ax-1 6. (Contributed by SN, 14-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | intnanrt 43016 | Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. Would be used in elfvov1 7465. (Contributed by SN, 18-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ioin9i8 43017 | Miscellaneous inference creating a biconditional from an implied converse implication. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 17-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → ¬ 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | jaodd 43018 | Double deduction form of jaoi 871. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 17-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an12 43019 | A double syllogism inference. (Contributed by SN, 15-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | exbiii 43020 | Inference associated with exbii 1881. Weaker version of eximii 1870. (Contributed by SN, 14-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | sbtd 43021* | A true statement is true upon substitution (deduction). A similar proof is possible for icht 48242. (Contributed by SN, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sbor2 43022 | One direction of sbor 2344, using fewer axioms. Compare 19.33 1917. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 18-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜓) → [𝑡 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbalexi 43023* | Inference form of sbalex 2281, avoiding ax-10 2179 by using ax-gen 1828. (Contributed by SN, 12-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfalh 43024 | Version of nfal 2359 with an 'h' hypothesis, avoiding ax-12 2216. (Contributed by SN, 11-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | nfe2 43025 | An inner existential quantifier's variable is bound. (Contributed by SN, 11-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | nfale2 43026 | An inner existential quantifier's variable is bound. (Contributed by SN, 11-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | 19.9dev 43027* | 19.9d 2242 in the case of an existential quantifier, avoiding the ax-10 2179 from nfex 2360 that would be used for the hypothesis of 19.9d 2242, at the cost of an additional DV condition on 𝑦, 𝜑. (Contributed by SN, 26-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 3rspcedvd 43028* | Triple application of rspcedvd 3586. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sn-axrep5v 43029* | A condensed form of axrep5 5251. (Contributed by SN, 21-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∃*𝑧𝜑 → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sn-axprlem3 43030* | axprlem3 5401 using only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes and ax-rep 5243. (Contributed by SN, 22-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 if-(𝜑, 𝑧 = 𝑎, 𝑧 = 𝑏)) | ||
| Theorem | sn-exelALT 43031* | Alternate proof of exel 5420, avoiding ax-pr 5409 but requiring ax-5 1943, ax-9 2156, and ax-pow 5341. This is similar to how elALT2 5345 uses ax-pow 5341 instead of ax-pr 5409 compared to el 5424. (Contributed by SN, 18-Sep-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | ssabdv 43032* | Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by SN, 22-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | sn-iotalem 43033* | An unused lemma showing that many equivalences involving df-iota 6499 are potentially provable without ax-10 2179, ax-11 2195, ax-12 2216. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = {𝑧 ∣ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = {𝑧}} | ||
| Theorem | sn-iotalemcor 43034* | Corollary of sn-iotalem 43033. Compare sb8iota 6510. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | abbi1sn 43035* | Originally part of uniabio 6513. Convert a theorem about df-iota 6499 to one about dfiota2 6500, without ax-10 2179, ax-11 2195, ax-12 2216. Although, eu6 2605 uses ax-10 2179 and ax-12 2216. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | brif2 43036 | Move a relation inside and outside the conditional operator. (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶𝑅if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝐶𝑅𝐴, 𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | brif12 43037 | Move a relation inside and outside the conditional operator. (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵)𝑅if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐷) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝐴𝑅𝐶, 𝐵𝑅𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pssexg 43038 | The proper subset of a set is also a set. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 17-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | pssn0 43039 | A proper superset is nonempty. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 17-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | psspwb 43040 | Classes are proper subclasses if and only if their power classes are proper subclasses. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 17-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊊ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xppss12 43041 | Proper subset theorem for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 17-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ⊊ (𝐵 × 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | elpwbi 43042 | Membership in a power set, biconditional. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 17-Jul-2022.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imaopab 43043* | The image of a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | eqresfnbd 43044 | Property of being the restriction of a function. Note that this is closer to funssres 6587 than fnssres 6665. (Contributed by SN, 11-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑅 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | fmpocos 43045* | Composition of two functions. Variation of fmpoco 8099 with more context in the substitution hypothesis for 𝑇. (Contributed by SN, 14-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑧⦌𝑆 = 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpogad 43046* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. Deduction form of ovmpoga 7577. (Contributed by SN, 14-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ofun 43047 | A function operation of unions of disjoint functions is a union of function operations. (Contributed by SN, 16-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 Fn 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 Fn 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 Fn 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 Fn 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∩ 𝑁) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ∘f 𝑅(𝐵 ∪ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∘f 𝑅𝐵) ∪ (𝐶 ∘f 𝑅𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | dfqs3 43048* | Alternate definition of quotient set. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 / 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {[𝑥]𝑅} | ||
| Theorem | qseq12d 43049 | Equality theorem for quotient set, deduction form. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 / 𝐶) = (𝐵 / 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | qsalrel 43050* | The quotient set is equal to the singleton of 𝐴 when all elements are related and 𝐴 is nonempty. (Contributed by SN, 8-Jun-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∼ 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 / ∼ ) = {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | supinf 43051* | The supremum is the infimum of the upper bounds. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, < ) = inf({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑤}, 𝐴, < )) | ||
| Theorem | mapcod 43052 | Compose two mappings. (Contributed by SN, 11-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fisdomnn 43053 | A finite set is dominated by the set of natural numbers. (Contributed by SN, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≺ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | ltex 43054 | The less-than relation is a set. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ < ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | leex 43055 | The less-than-or-equal-to relation is a set. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ ≤ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | subex 43056 | The subtraction operation is a set. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ − ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | absex 43057 | The absolute value function is a set. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ abs ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | cjex 43058 | The conjugate function is a set. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∗ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | fzosumm1 43059* | Separate out the last term in a finite sum. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑁 − 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)𝐴 = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀..^(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ccatcan2d 43060 | Cancellation law for concatenation. (Contributed by SN, 6-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Word 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Word 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Word 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ++ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ++ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Towards the start of this section are several proofs regarding the different complex number axioms that could be used to prove some results. For example, ax-1rid 11188 is used in mulrid 11224 related theorems, so one could trade off the extra axioms in mulrid 11224 for the axioms needed to prove that something is a real number. Another example is avoiding complex number closure laws by using real number closure laws and then using ax-resscn 11175; in the other direction, real number closure laws can be avoided by using ax-resscn 11175 and then the complex number closure laws. (This only works if the result of (𝐴 + 𝐵) only needs to be a complex number). The natural numbers are especially amenable to axiom reductions, as the set ℕ is the recursive set {1, (1 + 1), ((1 + 1) + 1)}, etc., i.e. the set of numbers formed by only additions of 1. The digits 2 through 9 are defined so that they expand into additions of 1. This conveniently allows for adding natural numbers by rearranging parentheses, as shown below: (4 + 3) = 7 ((3 + 1) + (2 + 1)) = (6 + 1) ((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + ((1 + 1) + 1)) = ((((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) This only requires ax-addass 11183, ax-1cn 11176, and ax-addcl 11178. (And in practice, the expression isn't fully expanded into ones.) Multiplication by 1 requires either mullidi 11232 or (ax-1rid 11188 and 1re 11226) as seen in 1t1e1 12420 and 1t1e1ALT 12309. Multiplying with greater natural numbers uses ax-distr 11185. Still, this takes fewer axioms than adding zero, which is often implicit in theorems such as (9 + 1) = ;10. Adding zero uses almost every complex number axiom, though notably not ax-mulcom 11182 (see readdrid 43212 and readdlid 43205). | ||
| Theorem | c0exALT 43061 | Alternate proof of c0ex 11218 using more set theory axioms but fewer complex number axioms (add ax-10 2179, ax-11 2195, ax-13 2407, ax-nul 5274, and remove ax-1cn 11176, ax-icn 11177, ax-addcl 11178, and ax-mulcl 11180). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | 0cnALT3 43062 | Alternate proof of 0cn 11216 using ax-resscn 11175, ax-addrcl 11179, ax-rnegex 11189, ax-cnre 11191 instead of ax-icn 11177, ax-addcl 11178, ax-mulcl 11180, ax-i2m1 11186. Version of 0cnALT 11463 using ax-1cn 11176 instead of ax-icn 11177. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | elre0re 43063 | Specialized version of 0red 11229 without using ax-1cn 11176 and ax-cnre 11191. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | lttrii 43064 | 'Less than' is transitive. (Contributed by SN, 26-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐵 < 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | remulcan2d 43065 | mulcan2d 11866 for real numbers using fewer axioms. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 15-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | readdridaddlidd 43066 | Given some real number 𝐵 where 𝐴 acts like a right additive identity, derive that 𝐴 is a left additive identity. Note that the hypothesis is weaker than proving that 𝐴 is a right additive identity (for all numbers). Although, if there is a right additive identity, then by readdcan 11402, 𝐴 is the right additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | 1p3e4 43067 | 1 + 3 = 4. (Contributed by SN, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (1 + 3) = 4 | ||
| Theorem | 5ne0 43068 | The number 5 is nonzero. (Contributed by SN, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 5 ≠ 0 | ||
| Theorem | 6ne0 43069 | The number 6 is nonzero. (Contributed by SN, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 6 ≠ 0 | ||
| Theorem | 7ne0 43070 | The number 7 is nonzero. (Contributed by SN, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 7 ≠ 0 | ||
| Theorem | 8ne0 43071 | The number 8 is nonzero. (Contributed by SN, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 8 ≠ 0 | ||
| Theorem | 9ne0 43072 | The number 9 is nonzero. (Contributed by SN, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 9 ≠ 0 | ||
| Theorem | sn-1ne2 43073 | A proof of 1ne2 12469 without using ax-mulcom 11182, ax-mulass 11184, ax-pre-mulgt0 11195. Based on mul02lem2 11405. (Contributed by SN, 13-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ 1 ≠ 2 | ||
| Theorem | nnn1suc 43074* | A positive integer that is not 1 is a successor of some other positive integer. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 19-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝑥 + 1) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | readdrcl2d 43075 | Reverse closure for addition: the second addend is real if the first addend is real and the sum is real. (Contributed by SN, 25-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | mvrrsubd 43076 |
Move a subtraction in the RHS to a right-addition in the LHS. Converse
of mvlraddd 11642.
EDITORIAL: Do not move until it would have 7 uses: current additional uses: (none). (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | laddrotrd 43077 |
Rotate the variables right in an equation with addition on the left,
converting it into a subtraction. Version of mvlladdd 11643 with a commuted
consequent, and of mvrladdd 11645 with a commuted hypothesis.
EDITORIAL: The label for this theorem is questionable. Do not move until it would have 7 uses: current additional uses: ply1dg3rt0irred 33905. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | raddswap12d 43078 |
Swap the first two variables in an equation with addition on the right,
converting it into a subtraction. Version of mvrraddd 11644 with a commuted
consequent, and of mvlraddd 11642 with a commuted hypothesis.
EDITORIAL: The label for this theorem is questionable. Do not move until it would have 7 uses: current additional uses: (none). (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 − 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | lsubrotld 43079 |
Rotate the variables left in an equation with subtraction on the left,
converting it into an addition.
EDITORIAL: The label for this theorem is questionable. Do not move until it would have 7 uses: current additional uses: (none). (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | rsubrotld 43080 |
Rotate the variables left in an equation with subtraction on the right,
converting it into an addition.
EDITORIAL: The label for this theorem is questionable. Do not move until it would have 7 uses: current additional uses: (none). (Contributed by SN, 4-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐶 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | lsubswap23d 43081 |
Swap the second and third variables in an equation with subtraction on
the left, converting it into an addition.
EDITORIAL: The label for this theorem is questionable. Do not move until it would have 7 uses: current additional uses: (none). (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | addsubeq4com 43082 | Relation between sums and differences. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | sqsumi 43083 | A sum squared. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · (𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)) + (2 · (𝐴 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | negn0nposznnd 43084 | Lemma for dffltz 43407. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 0 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | sqmid3api 43085 | Value of the square of the middle term of a 3-term arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 20-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝑁) = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝑁) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝑁 · 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | decaddcom 43086 | Commute ones place in addition. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 + 𝐶) = (;𝐴𝐶 + 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sqn5i 43087 | The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;(𝐴 · (𝐴 + 1))25 | ||
| Theorem | sqn5ii 43088 | The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;𝐶25 | ||
| Theorem | decpmulnc 43089 | Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication, no carry. Compare muladdi 11683. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;;𝐸𝐹𝐺 | ||
| Theorem | decpmul 43090 | Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = ;𝐺𝐻 & ⊢ (;𝐸𝐺 + 𝐹) = 𝐼 & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;𝐼𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | sqdeccom12 43091 | The square of a number in terms of its digits switched. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (;𝐵𝐴 · ;𝐵𝐴)) = (;99 · ((𝐴 · 𝐴) − (𝐵 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | sq3deccom12 43092 | Variant of sqdeccom12 43091 with a three digit square. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ ((;;𝐴𝐵𝐶 · ;;𝐴𝐵𝐶) − (;𝐷𝐵 · ;𝐷𝐵)) = (;99 · ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (𝐶 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | 4t5e20 43093 | 4 times 5 equals 20. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (4 · 5) = ;20 | ||
| Theorem | 3rdpwhole 43094 | A third of a number plus the number is four thirds of the number. (Contributed by SN, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((𝐴 / 3) + 𝐴) = (4 · (𝐴 / 3))) | ||
| Theorem | sq4 43095 | The square of 4 is 16. (Contributed by SN, 26-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (4↑2) = ;16 | ||
| Theorem | sq5 43096 | The square of 5 is 25. (Contributed by SN, 26-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (5↑2) = ;25 | ||
| Theorem | sq6 43097 | The square of 6 is 36. (Contributed by SN, 26-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (6↑2) = ;36 | ||
| Theorem | sq7 43098 | The square of 7 is 49. (Contributed by SN, 26-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (7↑2) = ;49 | ||
| Theorem | sq8 43099 | The square of 8 is 64. (Contributed by SN, 26-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (8↑2) = ;64 | ||
| Theorem | sq9 43100 | The square of 9 is 81. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (9↑2) = ;81 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |