Theorem ssdisjdr 48540

Description: Subset preserves disjointness. Deduction form of ssdisj 4483. Alternatively this could be proved with ineqcom 4231 in tandem with ssdisjd 48539. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ssdisjd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
ssdisjdr.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssdisjdr	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)

Proof of Theorem ssdisjdr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssdisjd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
2		sslin 4264	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))
4		ssdisjdr.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)
5		sseq0 4426	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
6	3, 4, 5	syl2anc 583	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1537   ∩ cin 3975   ⊆ wss 3976  ∅c0 4352

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353

This theorem is referenced by:  predisj  48542  seposep  48605