Theorem supeq2 9394

Description: Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supeq2	⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem supeq2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeq 3428	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
2		raleq 3317	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
3	2	anbi2d 639	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
4	3	rabbidv 3421	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
5	1, 4	eqtrd 2797	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
6	5	unieqd 4878	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
7		df-sup 9388	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
8		df-sup 9388	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
9	6, 7, 8	3eqtr4g 2822	1 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1560  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086  {crab 3414  ∪ cuni 4865   class class class wbr 5100  supcsup 9386

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-tru 1563  df-ex 1800  df-sb 2091  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-ss 3921  df-uni 4866  df-sup 9388

This theorem is referenced by:  infeq2  9426