Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 95 of 450) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28698) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28699-30221) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30222-44913) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | cardsn 9401 | A singleton has cardinality one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (card‘{𝐴}) = 1o) | ||
Theorem | carddomi2 9402 | Two sets have the dominance relationship if their cardinalities have the subset relationship and one is numerable. See also carddom 9979, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sdomsdomcardi 9403 | A set strictly dominates if its cardinal strictly dominates. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cardlim 9404 | An infinite cardinal is a limit ordinal. Equivalent to Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (ω ⊆ (card‘𝐴) ↔ Lim (card‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cardsdomelir 9405 | A cardinal strictly dominates its members. Equivalent to Proposition 10.37 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. This is half of the assertion cardsdomel 9406 and can be proven without the AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cardsdomel 9406 | A cardinal strictly dominates its members. Equivalent to Proposition 10.37 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (card‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | iscard 9407* | Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | iscard2 9408* | Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. Definition 8 of [Suppes] p. 225. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | carddom2 9409 | Two numerable sets have the dominance relationship iff their cardinalities have the subset relationship. See also carddom 9979, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | harcard 9410 | The class of ordinal numbers dominated by a set is a cardinal number. Theorem 59 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
⊢ (card‘(har‘𝐴)) = (har‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cardprclem 9411* | Lemma for cardprc 9412. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥} ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | cardprc 9412 | The class of all cardinal numbers is not a set (i.e. is a proper class). Theorem 19.8 of [Eisenberg] p. 310. In this proof (which does not use AC), we cannot use Cantor's construction canth3 9986 to ensure that there is always a cardinal larger than a given cardinal, but we can use Hartogs' construction hartogs 9011 to construct (effectively) (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) from (ℵ‘𝐴), which achieves the same thing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥} ∉ V | ||
Theorem | carduni 9413* | The union of a set of cardinals is a cardinal. Theorem 18.14 of [Monk1] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥 → (card‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cardiun 9414* | The indexed union of a set of cardinals is a cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (card‘𝐵) = 𝐵 → (card‘∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cardennn 9415 | If 𝐴 is equinumerous to a natural number, then that number is its cardinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (card‘𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cardsucinf 9416 | The cardinality of the successor of an infinite ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (card‘suc 𝐴) = (card‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cardsucnn 9417 | The cardinality of the successor of a finite ordinal (natural number). This theorem does not hold for infinite ordinals; see cardsucinf 9416. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (card‘suc 𝐴) = suc (card‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cardom 9418 | The set of natural numbers is a cardinal number. Theorem 18.11 of [Monk1] p. 133. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (card‘ω) = ω | ||
Theorem | carden2 9419 | Two numerable sets are equinumerous iff their cardinal numbers are equal. Unlike carden 9976, the Axiom of Choice is not required. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cardsdom2 9420 | A numerable set is strictly dominated by another iff their cardinalities are strictly ordered. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ∈ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | domtri2 9421 | Trichotomy of dominance for numerable sets (does not use AC). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | nnsdomel 9422 | Strict dominance and elementhood are the same for finite ordinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cardval2 9423* | An alternate version of the value of the cardinal number of a set. Compare cardval 9971. This theorem could be used to give a simpler definition of card in place of df-card 9371. It apparently does not occur in the literature. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | isinffi 9424* | An infinite set contains subsets equinumerous to every finite set. Extension of isinf 8734 from finite ordinals to all finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐵–1-1→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fidomtri 9425 | Trichotomy of dominance without AC when one set is finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fidomtri2 9426 | Trichotomy of dominance without AC when one set is finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | harsdom 9427 | The Hartogs number of a well-orderable set strictly dominates the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → 𝐴 ≺ (har‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | onsdom 9428* | Any well-orderable set is strictly dominated by an ordinal number. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | harval2 9429* | An alternate expression for the Hartogs number of a well-orderable set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (har‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | cardmin2 9430* | The smallest ordinal that strictly dominates a set is a cardinal, if it exists. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥 ↔ (card‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥}) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | pm54.43lem 9431* | In Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360, the number 1 is defined as the collection of all sets with cardinality 1 (i.e. all singletons; see card1 9400), so that their 𝐴 ∈ 1 means, in our notation, 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o}. Here we show that this is equivalent to 𝐴 ≈ 1o so that we can use the latter more convenient notation in pm54.43 9432. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o}) | ||
Theorem | pm54.43 9432 |
Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 360. "From this proposition it
will follow, when arithmetical addition has been defined, that
1+1=2."
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principia_Mathematica#Quotations.
This theorem states that two sets of cardinality 1 are disjoint iff
their union has cardinality 2.
Whitehead and Russell define 1 as the collection of all sets with cardinality 1 (i.e. all singletons; see card1 9400), so that their 𝐴 ∈ 1 means, in our notation, 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o} which is the same as 𝐴 ≈ 1o by pm54.43lem 9431. We do not have several of their earlier lemmas available (which would otherwise be unused by our different approach to arithmetic), so our proof is longer. (It is also longer because we must show every detail.) Theorem dju1p1e2 9602 shows the derivation of 1+1=2 for cardinal numbers from this theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 1o ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 1o) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≈ 2o)) | ||
Theorem | pr2nelem 9433 | Lemma for pr2ne 9434. (Contributed by FL, 17-Aug-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o) | ||
Theorem | pr2ne 9434 | If an unordered pair has two elements they are different. (Contributed by FL, 14-Feb-2010.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | prdom2 9435 | An unordered pair has at most two elements. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≼ 2o) | ||
Theorem | en2eqpr 9436 | Building a set with two elements. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ≈ 2o ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | en2eleq 9437 | Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → 𝑃 = {𝑋, ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})}) | ||
Theorem | en2other2 9438 | Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})}) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | dif1card 9439 | The cardinality of a nonempty finite set is one greater than the cardinality of the set with one element removed. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (card‘𝐴) = suc (card‘(𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}))) | ||
Theorem | leweon 9440* | Lexicographical order is a well-ordering of On × On. Proposition 7.56(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 54. Note that unlike r0weon 9441, this order is not set-like, as the preimage of 〈1o, ∅〉 is the proper class ({∅} × On). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐿 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐿 We (On × On) | ||
Theorem | r0weon 9441* | A set-like well-ordering of the class of ordinal pairs. Proposition 7.58(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 54. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐿 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))} & ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∣ ((𝑧 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) ∈ ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∨ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑧𝐿𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 We (On × On) ∧ 𝑅 Se (On × On)) | ||
Theorem | infxpenlem 9442* | Lemma for infxpen 9443. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐿 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))} & ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∣ ((𝑧 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) ∈ ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∨ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑧𝐿𝑤)))} & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑅 ∩ ((𝑎 × 𝑎) × (𝑎 × 𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑎 (ω ⊆ 𝑚 → (𝑚 × 𝑚) ≈ 𝑚)) ∧ (ω ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑎 𝑚 ≺ 𝑎))) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = OrdIso(𝑄, (𝑎 × 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | infxpen 9443 | Every infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its Cartesian square. Proposition 10.39 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 94, whose proof we follow closely. The key idea is to show that the relation 𝑅 is a well-ordering of (On × On) with the additional property that 𝑅-initial segments of (𝑥 × 𝑥) (where 𝑥 is a limit ordinal) are of cardinality at most 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | xpomen 9444 | The Cartesian product of omega (the set of ordinal natural numbers) with itself is equinumerous to omega. Exercise 1 of [Enderton] p. 133. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ (ω × ω) ≈ ω | ||
Theorem | xpct 9445 | The cartesian product of two countable sets is countable. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ ω ∧ 𝐵 ≼ ω) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≼ ω) | ||
Theorem | infxpidm2 9446 | The Cartesian product of an infinite set with itself is idempotent. This theorem provides the basis for infinite cardinal arithmetic. Proposition 10.40 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95. See also infxpidm 9987. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | infxpenc 9447* | A canonical version of infxpen 9443, by a completely different approach (although it uses infxpen 9443 via xpomen 9444). Using Cantor's normal form, we can show that 𝐴 ↑o 𝐵 respects equinumerosity (oef1o 9164), so that all the steps of (ω↑𝑊) · (ω↑𝑊) ≈ ω↑(2𝑊) ≈ (ω↑2)↑𝑊 ≈ ω↑𝑊 can be verified using bijections to do the ordinal commutations. (The assumption on 𝑁 can be satisfied using cnfcom3c 9172.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐴–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋)))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 〈(𝑁‘𝑥), (𝑁‘𝑦)〉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡𝑁 ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | infxpenc2lem1 9448* | Lemma for infxpenc2 9451. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ω ⊆ 𝑏)) → (𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ∧ (𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | infxpenc2lem2 9449* | Lemma for infxpenc2 9451. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋)))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ 〈((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑥), ((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑦)〉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡(𝑛‘𝑏) ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏)) | ||
Theorem | infxpenc2lem3 9450* | Lemma for infxpenc2 9451. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏)) | ||
Theorem | infxpenc2 9451* | Existence form of infxpenc 9447. A "uniform" or "canonical" version of infxpen 9443, asserting the existence of a single function 𝑔 that simultaneously demonstrates product idempotence of all ordinals below a given bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏)) | ||
Theorem | iunmapdisj 9452* | The union ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐶(𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) is a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ ∃*𝑛 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) | ||
Theorem | fseqenlem1 9453* | Lemma for fseqen 9456. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {〈∅, 𝐵〉}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ω) → (𝐺‘𝐶):(𝐴 ↑m 𝐶)–1-1→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fseqenlem2 9454* | Lemma for fseqen 9456. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {〈∅, 𝐵〉}) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘) ↦ 〈dom 𝑦, ((𝐺‘dom 𝑦)‘𝑦)〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘)–1-1→(ω × 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fseqdom 9455* | One half of fseqen 9456. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (ω × 𝐴) ≼ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛)) | ||
Theorem | fseqen 9456* | A set that is equinumerous to its Cartesian product is equinumerous to the set of finite sequences on it. (This can be proven more easily using some choice but this proof avoids it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) ≈ (ω × 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | infpwfidom 9457 | The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V because this theorem also implies that 𝐴 is a set if 𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V → 𝐴 ≼ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) | ||
Theorem | dfac8alem 9458* | Lemma for dfac8a 9459. If the power set of a set has a choice function, then the set is numerable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (∃𝑔∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝑔‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card)) | ||
Theorem | dfac8a 9459* | Numeration theorem: every set with a choice function on its power set is numerable. With AC, this reduces to the statement that every set is numerable. Similar to Theorem 10.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 84. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃ℎ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (ℎ‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card)) | ||
Theorem | dfac8b 9460* | The well-ordering theorem: every numerable set is well-orderable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | dfac8clem 9461* | Lemma for dfac8c 9462. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ↦ (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ¬ 𝑏𝑟𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | dfac8c 9462* | If the union of a set is well-orderable, then the set has a choice function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | ac10ct 9463* | A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 9920, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ween 9464* | A set is numerable iff it can be well-ordered. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card ↔ ∃𝑟 𝑟 We 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ac5num 9465* | A version of ac5b 9903 with the choice as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((∪ 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | ondomen 9466 | If a set is dominated by an ordinal, then it is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | numdom 9467 | A set dominated by a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | ssnum 9468 | A subset of a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | onssnum 9469 | All subsets of the ordinals are numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ On) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | indcardi 9470* | Indirect strong induction on the cardinality of a finite or numerable set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ dom card) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 ≼ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑆 ≺ 𝑅 → 𝜒)) → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | acnrcl 9471 | Reverse closure for the choice set predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | acneq 9472 | Equality theorem for the choice set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | isacn 9473* | The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}) ↑m 𝐴)∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | acni 9474* | The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | acni2 9475* | The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | acni3 9476* | The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑔‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝜑) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | acnlem 9477* | Construct a mapping satisfying the consequent of isacn 9473. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | numacn 9478 | A well-orderable set has choice sequences of every length. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ dom card → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | finacn 9479 | Every set has finite choice sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → AC 𝐴 = V) | ||
Theorem | acndom 9480 | A set with long choice sequences also has shorter choice sequences, where "shorter" here means the new index set is dominated by the old index set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | acnnum 9481 | A set 𝑋 which has choice sequences on it of length 𝒫 𝑋 is well-orderable (and hence has choice sequences of every length). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝒫 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | acnen 9482 | The class of choice sets of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | acndom2 9483 | A set smaller than one with choice sequences of length 𝐴 also has choice sequences of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → (𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | acnen2 9484 | The class of sets with choice sequences of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ≈ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fodomacn 9485 | A version of fodom 9947 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 9884. If 𝐴 has choice sequences of length 𝐵, then any surjection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 can be inverted to an injection the other way. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ AC 𝐵 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fodomnum 9486 | A version of fodom 9947 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 9884. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fonum 9487 | A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | numwdom 9488 | A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼* 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | fodomfi2 9489 | Onto functions define dominance when a finite number of choices need to be made. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | wdomfil 9490 | Weak dominance agrees with normal for finite left sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ Fin → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ≼ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | infpwfien 9491 | Any infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to its set of finite subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | inffien 9492 | The set of finite intersections of an infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to the set itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (fi‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | wdomnumr 9493 | Weak dominance agrees with normal for numerable right sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom card → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | alephfnon 9494 | The aleph function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ ℵ Fn On | ||
Theorem | aleph0 9495 | The first infinite cardinal number, discovered by Georg Cantor in 1873, has the same size as the set of natural numbers ω (and under our particular definition is also equal to it). In the literature, the argument of the aleph function is often written as a subscript, and the first aleph is written ℵ0. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. Also Definition 12(i) of [Suppes] p. 228. From Moshé Machover, Set Theory, Logic, and Their Limitations, p. 95: "Aleph...the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet...is also the first letter of the Hebrew word...(einsoph, meaning infinity), which is a cabbalistic appellation of the deity. The notation is due to Cantor, who was deeply interested in mysticism." (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω | ||
Theorem | alephlim 9496* | Value of the aleph function at a limit ordinal. Definition 12(iii) of [Suppes] p. 91. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (ℵ‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (ℵ‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | alephsuc 9497 | Value of the aleph function at a successor ordinal. Definition 12(ii) of [Suppes] p. 91. Here we express the successor aleph in terms of the Hartogs function df-har 9025, which gives the smallest ordinal that strictly dominates its argument (or the supremum of all ordinals that are dominated by the argument). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = (har‘(ℵ‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | alephon 9498 | An aleph is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ On | ||
Theorem | alephcard 9499 | Every aleph is a cardinal number. Theorem 65 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ (card‘(ℵ‘𝐴)) = (ℵ‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | alephnbtwn 9500 | No cardinal can be sandwiched between an aleph and its successor aleph. Theorem 67 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((card‘𝐵) = 𝐵 → ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |