| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 95 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30900) |
(30901-32423) |
(32424-49930) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | infiso 9401* | Image of an infimum under an isomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑧𝑅𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘inf(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Syntax | coi 9402 | Extend class definition to include the canonical order isomorphism to an ordinal. |
| class OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) | ||
| Definition | df-oi 9403* | Define the canonical order isomorphism from the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 to an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) = if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dfoi 9404* | Rewrite df-oi 9403 with abbreviations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) = if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (𝐹 ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅) | ||
| Theorem | oieq1 9405 | Equality theorem for ordinal isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) = OrdIso(𝑆, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | oieq2 9406 | Equality theorem for ordinal isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nfoi 9407 | Hypothesis builder for ordinal isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ordiso2 9408 | Generalize ordiso 9409 to proper classes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ordiso 9409* | Order-isomorphic ordinal numbers are equal. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 16-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypecbv 9410* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) = 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem1 9411* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem2 9412* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ord 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem3 9413* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (𝑇 ∩ dom 𝐹)) → (𝐹‘𝑀) ∈ {𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑀)𝑗𝑅𝑤} ∣ ∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑀)𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣}) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem4 9414* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂:(𝑇 ∩ dom 𝐹)⟶𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem5 9415* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ord dom 𝑂 ∧ 𝑂:dom 𝑂⟶𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem6 9416* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ dom 𝑂) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝑂‘𝑁)𝑅(𝑂‘𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem7 9417* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. ran 𝑂 is an initial segment of 𝐴 under the well-order 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ dom 𝑂) → ((𝑂‘𝑀)𝑅𝑁 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ ran 𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem8 9418* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝑂, ran 𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem9 9419* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. Either the function OrdIso is an isomorphism onto all of 𝐴, or OrdIso is not a set, which by oif 9423 implies that either ran 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐴 is a proper class or dom 𝑂 = On. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝑂, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ordtypelem10 9420* | Lemma for ordtype 9425. Using ax-rep 5219, exclude the possibility that 𝑂 is a proper class and does not enumerate all of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝑂, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | oi0 9421 | Definition of the ordinal isomorphism when its arguments are not meaningful. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | oicl 9422 | The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ Ord dom 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | oif 9423 | The order isomorphism of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | oiiso2 9424 | The order isomorphism of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an isomorphism onto ran 𝑂 (which is a subset of 𝐴 by oif 9423). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, ran 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ordtype 9425 | For any set-like well-ordered class, there is an isomorphic ordinal number called its order type. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | oiiniseg 9426 | ran 𝐹 is an initial segment of 𝐴 under the well-order 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ dom 𝐹)) → ((𝐹‘𝑀)𝑅𝑁 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ ran 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ordtype2 9427 | For any set-like well-ordered class, if the order isomorphism exists (is a set), then it maps some ordinal onto 𝐴 isomorphically. Otherwise, 𝐹 is a proper class, which implies that either ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 is a proper class or dom 𝐹 = On. This weak version of ordtype 9425 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | oiexg 9428 | The order isomorphism on a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | oion 9429 | The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | oiiso 9430 | The order isomorphism of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | oien 9431 | The order type of a well-ordered set is equinumerous to the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | oieu 9432 | Uniqueness of the unique ordinal isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 Isom E , 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) ↔ (𝐵 = dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 = 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | oismo 9433 | When 𝐴 is a subclass of On, 𝐹 is a strictly monotone ordinal functions, and it is also complete (it is an isomorphism onto all of 𝐴). The proof avoids ax-rep 5219 (the second statement is trivial under ax-rep 5219). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso( E , 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (Smo 𝐹 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | oiid 9434 | The order type of an ordinal under the ∈ order is itself, and the order isomorphism is the identity function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → OrdIso( E , 𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | hartogslem1 9435* | Lemma for hartogs 9437. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑟, 𝑦〉 ∣ (((dom 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟)) ∧ (𝑟 ∖ I ) We dom 𝑟) ∧ 𝑦 = dom OrdIso((𝑟 ∖ I ), dom 𝑟))} & ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑠, 𝑡〉 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑠 = (𝑓‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑡 = (𝑓‘𝑧)) ∧ 𝑤 E 𝑧)} ⇒ ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ 𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | hartogslem2 9436* | Lemma for hartogs 9437. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑟, 𝑦〉 ∣ (((dom 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟)) ∧ (𝑟 ∖ I ) We dom 𝑟) ∧ 𝑦 = dom OrdIso((𝑟 ∖ I ), dom 𝑟))} & ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑠, 𝑡〉 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑠 = (𝑓‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑡 = (𝑓‘𝑧)) ∧ 𝑤 E 𝑧)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ 𝐴} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | hartogs 9437* | The class of ordinals dominated by a given set is an ordinal. A shorter (when taking into account lemmas hartogslem1 9435 and hartogslem2 9436) proof can be given using the axiom of choice, see ondomon 10461. As its label indicates, this result is used to justify the definition of the Hartogs function df-har 9450. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ 𝐴} ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | wofib 9438 | The only sets which are well-ordered forwards and backwards are finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ↔ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝑅 We 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | wemaplem1 9439* | Value of the lexicographic order on a sequence space. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑃𝑇𝑄 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑃‘𝑎)𝑆(𝑄‘𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑏𝑅𝑎 → (𝑃‘𝑏) = (𝑄‘𝑏))))) | ||
| Theorem | wemaplem2 9440* | Lemma for wemapso 9444. Transitivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑎)𝑆(𝑋‘𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐𝑅𝑎 → (𝑃‘𝑐) = (𝑋‘𝑐))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋‘𝑏)𝑆(𝑄‘𝑏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐𝑅𝑏 → (𝑋‘𝑐) = (𝑄‘𝑐))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃𝑇𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | wemaplem3 9441* | Lemma for wemapso 9444. Transitivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃𝑇𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑇𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃𝑇𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | wemappo 9442* |
Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a
well-ordering of the indices and a total ordering of the values.
Without totality on the values or least differing indices, the best we can prove here is a partial order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | wemapsolem 9443* | Lemma for wemapso 9444. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Or 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏)) → ∃𝑐 ∈ dom (𝑎 ∖ 𝑏)∀𝑑 ∈ dom (𝑎 ∖ 𝑏) ¬ 𝑑𝑅𝑐) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Or 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | wemapso 9444* | Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a well-ordering of the indices and a total ordering of the values. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) → 𝑇 Or (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | wemapso2lem 9445* | Lemma for wemapso2 9446. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑇 Or 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | wemapso2 9446* | An alternative to having a well-order on 𝑅 in wemapso 9444 is to restrict the function set to finitely-supported functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) → 𝑇 Or 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | card2on 9447* | The alternate definition of the cardinal of a set given in cardval2 9891 always gives a set, and indeed an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴} ∈ On | ||
| Theorem | card2inf 9448* | The alternate definition of the cardinal of a set given in cardval2 9891 has the curious property that for non-numerable sets (for which ndmfv 6860 yields ∅), it still evaluates to a nonempty set, and indeed it contains ω. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑦 ≈ 𝐴 → ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴}) | ||
| Syntax | char 9449 | Class symbol for the Hartogs function. |
| class har | ||
| Definition | df-har 9450* |
Define the Hartogs function as mapping a set to the class of ordinals it
dominates. That class is an ordinal by hartogs 9437, which is used in
harf 9451.
The Hartogs number of a set is the least ordinal not dominated by that set. Theorem harval2 9897 proves that the Hartogs function actually gives the Hartogs number for well-orderable sets. The Hartogs number of an ordinal is its cardinal successor. This is proved for finite ordinal in harsucnn 9898. Traditionally, the Hartogs number of a set 𝑋 is written ℵ(𝑋), and its cardinal successor, 𝑋 +; we use functional notation for this, and cannot use the aleph symbol because it is taken for the enumerating function of the infinite initial ordinals df-aleph 9840. Some authors define the Hartogs number of a set to be the least *infinite* ordinal which does not inject into it, thus causing the range to consist only of alephs. We use the simpler definition where the value can be any successor cardinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ har = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | harf 9451 | Functionality of the Hartogs function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ har:V⟶On | ||
| Theorem | harcl 9452 | Values of the Hartogs function are ordinals (closure of the Hartogs function in the ordinals). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (har‘𝑋) ∈ On | ||
| Theorem | harval 9453* | Function value of the Hartogs function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (har‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | elharval 9454 | The Hartogs number of a set contains exactly the ordinals that set dominates. Combined with harcl 9452, this implies that the Hartogs number of a set is greater than all ordinals that set dominates. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (har‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ On ∧ 𝑌 ≼ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | harndom 9455 | The Hartogs number of a set does not inject into that set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (har‘𝑋) ≼ 𝑋 | ||
| Theorem | harword 9456 | Weak ordering property of the Hartogs function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → (har‘𝑋) ⊆ (har‘𝑌)) | ||
| Syntax | cwdom 9457 | Class symbol for the weak dominance relation. |
| class ≼* | ||
| Definition | df-wdom 9458* | A set is weakly dominated by a "larger" set if the "larger" set can be mapped onto the "smaller" set or the smaller set is empty, or equivalently, if the smaller set can be placed into bijection with some partition of the larger set. Dominance (df-dom 8877) implies weak dominance (over ZF). The principle asserting the converse is known as the partition principle and is independent of ZF. Theorem fodom 10421 proves that the axiom of choice implies the partition principle (over ZF). It is not known whether the partition principle is equivalent to the axiom of choice (over ZF), although it is know to imply dependent choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ≼* = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑦–onto→𝑥)} | ||
| Theorem | relwdom 9459 | Weak dominance is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel ≼* | ||
| Theorem | brwdom 9460* | Property of weak dominance (definitional form). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑌–onto→𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | brwdomi 9461* | Property of weak dominance, forward direction only. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 → (𝑋 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑌–onto→𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | brwdomn0 9462* | Weak dominance over nonempty sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑌–onto→𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | 0wdom 9463 | Any set weakly dominates the empty set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼* 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | fowdom 9464 | An onto function implies weak dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑌–onto→𝑋) → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | wdomref 9465 | Reflexivity of weak dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | brwdom2 9466* | Alternate characterization of the weak dominance predicate which does not require special treatment of the empty set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑌∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑦–onto→𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | domwdom 9467 | Weak dominance is implied by dominance in the usual sense. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | wdomtr 9468 | Transitivity of weak dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≼* 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | wdomen1 9469 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and weak dominance. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≼* 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | wdomen2 9470 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and weak dominance. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≼* 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≼* 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | wdompwdom 9471 | Weak dominance strengthens to usual dominance on the power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 → 𝒫 𝑋 ≼ 𝒫 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | canthwdom 9472 | Cantor's Theorem, stated using weak dominance (this is actually a stronger statement than canth2 9050, equivalent to canth 7306). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | wdom2d 9473* | Deduce weak dominance from an implicit onto function (stated in a way which avoids ax-rep 5219). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | wdomd 9474* | Deduce weak dominance from an implicit onto function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | brwdom3 9475* | Condition for weak dominance with a condition reminiscent of wdomd 9474. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | brwdom3i 9476* | Weak dominance implies existence of a covering function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 → ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | unwdomg 9477 | Weak dominance of a (disjoint) union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≼* 𝐷 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ≼* (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | xpwdomg 9478 | Weak dominance of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≼* 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | wdomima2g 9479 | A set is weakly dominant over its image under any function. This version of wdomimag 9480 is stated so as to avoid ax-rep 5219. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ≼* 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | wdomimag 9480 | A set is weakly dominant over its image under any function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ≼* 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | unxpwdom2 9481 | Lemma for unxpwdom 9482. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | unxpwdom 9482 | If a Cartesian product is dominated by a union, then the base set is either weakly dominated by one factor of the union or dominated by the other. Extracted from Lemma 2.3 of [KanamoriPincus] p. 420. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ixpiunwdom 9483* | Describe an onto function from the indexed cartesian product to the indexed union. Together with ixpssmapg 8858 this shows that ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵 and X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵 have closely linked cardinalities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≼* (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 × 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | harwdom 9484 | The value of the Hartogs function at a set 𝑋 is weakly dominated by 𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑋). This follows from a more precise analysis of the bound used in hartogs 9437 to prove that (har‘𝑋) is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (har‘𝑋) ≼* 𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑋)) | ||
| Axiom | ax-reg 9485* | Axiom of Regularity. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Also called the Axiom of Foundation. A rather non-intuitive axiom that denies more than it asserts, it states (in the form of zfreg 9489) that every nonempty set contains a set disjoint from itself. One consequence is that it denies the existence of a set containing itself (elirrv 9490). A stronger version that works for proper classes is proved as zfregs 9629. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | axreg2 9486* | Axiom of Regularity expressed more compactly. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | zfregcl 9487* | The Axiom of Regularity with class variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1994.) Replace sethood hypothesis with sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.) Avoid ax-10 2146 and ax-12 2182. (Revised by TM, 31-Dec-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | zfregclOLD 9488* | Obsolete version of zfregcl 9487 as of 31-Dec-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1994.) Replace sethood hypothesis with sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | zfreg 9489* | The Axiom of Regularity using abbreviations. Axiom 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. This is called the "weak form". Axiom Reg of [BellMachover] p. 480. There is also a "strong form", not requiring that 𝐴 be a set, that can be proved with more difficulty (see zfregs 9629). (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1995.) Replace sethood hypothesis with sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | elirrv 9490 | The membership relation is irreflexive: no set is a member of itself. Theorem 105 of [Suppes] p. 54. This is trivial to prove from zfregfr 9501 and efrirr 5599 (see elirrvALT 9502), but this proof is direct from ax-reg 9485. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) Reduce axiom dependencies and make use of ax-reg 9485 directly. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 27-Dec-2025.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | elirrvOLD 9491 | Obsolete version of elirrv 9490 as of 27-Dec-2025. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | elirr 9492 | No class is a member of itself. Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Theorem 1.9(i) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | elneq 9493 | A class is not equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nelaneq 9494 | A class is not an element of and equal to a class at the same time. Variant of elneq 9493 analogously to elnotel 9507 and en2lp 9503. (Proposed by BJ, 18-Jun-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2022.) (Proof shortened by TM, 31-Dec-2025.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nelaneqOLD 9495 | Obsolete version of nelaneq 9494 as of 31-Dec-2025. (Proposed by BJ, 18-Jun-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | epinid0 9496 | The membership relation and the identity relation are disjoint. Variable-free version of nelaneq 9494. (Proposed by BJ, 18-Jun-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( E ∩ I ) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | sucprcreg 9497 | A class is equal to its successor iff it is a proper class (assuming the Axiom of Regularity). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ↔ suc 𝐴 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ruv 9498 | The Russell class is equal to the universe V. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Oct-2008.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} = V | ||
| Theorem | ruALT 9499 | Alternate proof of ru 3735, simplified using (indirectly) the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9485. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Oct-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} ∉ V | ||
| Theorem | disjcsn 9500 | A class is disjoint from its singleton. A consequence of regularity. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by BJ, 4-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅ | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |