Theorem bj-dfom 16873

Description: Alternate definition of om, as the intersection of all the inductive sets. Proposal: make this the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-dfom	|- om = |^| { x | Ind x }

Proof of Theorem bj-dfom

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfom3 4734	. 2 |- om = |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) }
2		df-bj-ind 16867	. . . . 5 |- (Ind x <-> ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) )
3	2	bicomi 132	. . . 4 |- ( ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) <-> Ind x )
4	3	abbii 2354	. . 3 |- { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) } = { x | Ind x }
5	4	inteqi 3969	. 2 |- |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) } = |^| { x | Ind x }
6	1, 5	eqtri 2259	1 |- om = |^| { x | Ind x }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   {cab 2224   A.wral 2528   (/)c0 3520   |^|cint 3965   suc csuc 4505   omcom 4732  Ind wind 16866

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-int 3966  df-iom 4733  df-bj-ind 16867

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omind  16874  bj-omssind  16875  bj-ssom  16876