Theorem bj-dfom 16068

Description: Alternate definition of om, as the intersection of all the inductive sets. Proposal: make this the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-dfom	|- om = |^| { x | Ind x }

Proof of Theorem bj-dfom

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfom3 4658	. 2 |- om = |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) }
2		df-bj-ind 16062	. . . . 5 |- (Ind x <-> ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) )
3	2	bicomi 132	. . . 4 |- ( ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) <-> Ind x )
4	3	abbii 2323	. . 3 |- { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) } = { x | Ind x }
5	4	inteqi 3903	. 2 |- |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) } = |^| { x | Ind x }
6	1, 5	eqtri 2228	1 |- om = |^| { x | Ind x }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2178   {cab 2193   A.wral 2486   (/)c0 3468   |^|cint 3899   suc csuc 4430   omcom 4656  Ind wind 16061

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-ext 2189

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-int 3900  df-iom 4657  df-bj-ind 16062

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omind  16069  bj-omssind  16070  bj-ssom  16071