Theorem bj-dfom 15663

Description: Alternate definition of ω, as the intersection of all the inductive sets. Proposal: make this the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-dfom	⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}

Proof of Theorem bj-dfom

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfom3 4629	. 2 ⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)}
2		df-bj-ind 15657	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ind 𝑥 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
3	2	bicomi 132	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Ind 𝑥)
4	3	abbii 2312	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}
5	4	inteqi 3879	. 2 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}
6	1, 5	eqtri 2217	1 ⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167  {cab 2182  ∀wral 2475  ∅c0 3451  ∩ cint 3875  suc csuc 4401  ωcom 4627  Ind wind 15656

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-int 3876  df-iom 4628  df-bj-ind 15657

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omind  15664  bj-omssind  15665  bj-ssom  15666