Theorem cbvriota 5884

Description: Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvriota.1	|- F/ y ph
cbvriota.2	|- F/ x ps
cbvriota.3	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvriota	|- ( iota_ x e. A ph ) = ( iota_ y e. A ps )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   y, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)

Proof of Theorem cbvriota

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2256	. . . . 5 |- ( x = z -> ( x e. A <-> z e. A ) )
2		sbequ12 1782	. . . . 5 |- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> [ z / x ] ph ) )
3	1, 2	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 |- ( x = z -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( z e. A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) ) )
4		nfv 1539	. . . 4 |- F/ z ( x e. A /\ ph )
5		nfv 1539	. . . . 5 |- F/ x z e. A
6		nfs1v 1955	. . . . 5 |- F/ x [ z / x ] ph
7	5, 6	nfan 1576	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( z e. A /\ [ z / x ] ph )
8	3, 4, 7	cbviota 5220	. . 3 |- ( iota x ( x e. A /\ ph ) ) = ( iota z ( z e. A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) )
9		eleq1 2256	. . . . 5 |- ( z = y -> ( z e. A <-> y e. A ) )
10		sbequ 1851	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph ) )
11		cbvriota.2	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ x ps
12		cbvriota.3	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
13	11, 12	sbie 1802	. . . . . 6 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )
14	10, 13	bitrdi 196	. . . . 5 |- ( z = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> ps ) )
15	9, 14	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 |- ( z = y -> ( ( z e. A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) <-> ( y e. A /\ ps ) ) )
16		nfv 1539	. . . . 5 |- F/ y z e. A
17		cbvriota.1	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y ph
18	17	nfsb 1962	. . . . 5 |- F/ y [ z / x ] ph
19	16, 18	nfan 1576	. . . 4 |- F/ y ( z e. A /\ [ z / x ] ph )
20		nfv 1539	. . . 4 |- F/ z ( y e. A /\ ps )
21	15, 19, 20	cbviota 5220	. . 3 |- ( iota z ( z e. A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) ) = ( iota y ( y e. A /\ ps ) )
22	8, 21	eqtri 2214	. 2 |- ( iota x ( x e. A /\ ph ) ) = ( iota y ( y e. A /\ ps ) )
23		df-riota 5873	. 2 |- ( iota_ x e. A ph ) = ( iota x ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
24		df-riota 5873	. 2 |- ( iota_ y e. A ps ) = ( iota y ( y e. A /\ ps ) )
25	22, 23, 24	3eqtr4i 2224	1 |- ( iota_ x e. A ph ) = ( iota_ y e. A ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   F/wnf 1471   [wsb 1773   e. wcel 2164   iotacio 5213   iota_crio 5872

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-rex 2478  df-sn 3624  df-uni 3836  df-iota 5215  df-riota 5873

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvriotav  5885