ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  reu7 Unicode version

Theorem reu7 2850
Description: Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
rmo4.1  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  ps ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
reu7  |-  ( E! x  e.  A  ph  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
Distinct variable groups:    x, y, A    ph, y    ps, x
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x)    ps( y)

Proof of Theorem reu7
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 reu3 2845 . 2  |-  ( E! x  e.  A  ph  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z ) ) )
2 rmo4.1 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  ps ) )
3 equequ1 1671 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  =  z  <->  y  =  z ) )
4 equcom 1665 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( y  =  z  <->  z  =  y )
53, 4syl6bb 195 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  =  z  <->  z  =  y ) )
62, 5imbi12d 233 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  ( ps  ->  z  =  y ) ) )
76cbvralv 2629 . . . . 5  |-  ( A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y ) )
87rexbii 2417 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  E. z  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y ) )
9 equequ1 1671 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  (
z  =  y  <->  x  =  y ) )
109imbi2d 229 . . . . . 6  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  (
( ps  ->  z  =  y )  <->  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
1110ralbidv 2412 . . . . 5  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  ( A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y )  <->  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
1211cbvrexv 2630 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y )  <->  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) )
138, 12bitri 183 . . 3  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) )
1413anbi2i 450 . 2  |-  ( ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z ) )  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph  /\  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
151, 14bitri 183 1  |-  ( E! x  e.  A  ph  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 103    <-> wb 104   A.wral 2391   E.wrex 2392   E!wreu 2393
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1317  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-eu 1978  df-mo 1979  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-nfc 2245  df-ral 2396  df-rex 2397  df-reu 2398  df-rmo 2399
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator