Theorem 2exsb 1933

Description: An equivalent expression for double existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2exsb	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑦,𝑤,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2exsb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exsb 1932	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))
2	1	exbii 1541	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑤∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))
3		excom 1599	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑤∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))
4	2, 3	bitri 182	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))
5		exsb 1932	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
6		impexp 259	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
7	6	albii 1404	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
8		19.21v 1801	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
9	7, 8	bitr2i 183	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
10	9	albii 1404	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
11	10	exbii 1541	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
12	5, 11	bitri 182	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
13	12	exbii 1541	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑧∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
14		excom 1599	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∃𝑧∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
15	4, 13, 14	3bitri 204	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103  ∀wal 1287  ∃wex 1426

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-11 1442  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-sb 1693

This theorem is referenced by: (None)