| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 21 of 169) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | nfsbv 2001* | If 𝑧 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 when 𝑧 is distinct from 𝑥 and 𝑦. Version of nfsb 2000 requiring more disjoint variables. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.) Remove disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 13-Aug-2023.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | sbco2v 2002* | Version of sbco2 2019 with disjoint variable conditions. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | hbsb 2003* | If 𝑧 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 when 𝑦 and 𝑧 are distinct. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | equsb3lem 2004* | Lemma for equsb3 2005. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | equsb3 2005* | Substitution applied to an atomic wff. (Contributed by Raph Levien and FL, 4-Dec-2005.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | sbn 2006 | Negation inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbim 2007 | Implication inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbor 2008 | Logical OR inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sban 2009 | Conjunction inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbrim 2010 | Substitution with a variable not free in antecedent affects only the consequent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sblim 2011 | Substitution with a variable not free in consequent affects only the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sb3an 2012 | Conjunction inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbbi 2013 | Equivalence inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sblbis 2014 | Introduce left biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbrbis 2015 | Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbrbif 2016 | Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbco2yz 2017* | This is a version of sbco2 2019 where 𝑧 is distinct from 𝑦. It is a lemma on the way to proving sbco2 2019 which has no distinct variable constraints. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbco2h 2018 | A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbco2 2019 | A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbco2d 2020 | A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbco2vd 2021* | Version of sbco2d 2020 with a distinct variable constraint between 𝑥 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbco 2022 | A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbco3v 2023* | Version of sbco3 2028 with a distinct variable constraint between 𝑥 and 𝑦. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcocom 2024 | Relationship between composition and commutativity for substitution. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcomv 2025* | Version of sbcom 2029 with a distinct variable constraint between 𝑥 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcomxyyz 2026* | Version of sbcom 2029 with distinct variable constraints between 𝑥 and 𝑦, and 𝑦 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbco3xzyz 2027* | Version of sbco3 2028 with distinct variable constraints between 𝑥 and 𝑧, and 𝑦 and 𝑧. Lemma for proving sbco3 2028. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbco3 2028 | A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcom 2029 | A commutativity law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfsbt 2030* | Closed form of nfsb 2000. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfsbd 2031* | Deduction version of nfsb 2000. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sb9v 2032* | Like sb9 2033 but with a distinct variable constraint between 𝑥 and 𝑦. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥[𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sb9 2033 | Commutation of quantification and substitution variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥[𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sb9i 2034 | Commutation of quantification and substitution variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥[𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbnf2 2035* | Two ways of expressing "𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝜑." (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | hbsbd 2036* | Deduction version of hbsb 2003. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sb5 2037* | Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sb6 2038* | Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcom2v 2039* | Lemma for proving sbcom2 2041. It is the same as sbcom2 2041 but with additional distinct variable constraints on 𝑥 and 𝑦, and on 𝑤 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑧]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcom2v2 2040* | Lemma for proving sbcom2 2041. It is the same as sbcom2v 2039 but removes the distinct variable constraint on 𝑥 and 𝑦. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑧]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcom2 2041* | Commutativity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.) (Proof modified to be intuitionistic by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑧]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sb6a 2042* | Equivalence for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sb5rf 2043* | Reversed double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sb6rf 2044* | Reversed double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | dfsb7 2045* | An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1812. By introducing a dummy variable 𝑧 in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝜑 of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because 𝑧 effectively insulates 𝑥 from 𝑦. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 1937, first 𝑧 for 𝑥 then 𝑦 for 𝑧. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17. Theorem sb7f 2046 provides a version where 𝜑 and 𝑧 don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | sb7f 2046* | This version of dfsb7 2045 does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be disjoint. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 1575, i.e., that does not have the concept of a variable not occurring in a formula. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | sb7af 2047* | An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1812. Similar to dfsb7a 2048 but does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. Similar to sb7f 2046 in that it involves a dummy variable 𝑧, but expressed in terms of ∀ rather than ∃. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | dfsb7a 2048* | An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1812. Similar to dfsb7 2045 in that it involves a dummy variable 𝑧, but expressed in terms of ∀ rather than ∃. For a version which only requires Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 rather than 𝑧 and 𝜑 being distinct, see sb7af 2047. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | sb10f 2049* | Hao Wang's identity axiom P6 in Irving Copi, Symbolic Logic (5th ed., 1979), p. 328. In traditional predicate calculus, this is a sole axiom for identity from which the usual ones can be derived. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbid2v 2050* | An identity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbelx 2051* | Elimination of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbel2x 2052* | Elimination of double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbalyz 2053* | Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution. Identical to sbal 2054 except that it has an additional distinct variable constraint on 𝑦 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbal 2054* | Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbal1yz 2055* | Lemma for proving sbal1 2056. Same as sbal1 2056 but with an additional disjoint variable condition on 𝑦, 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbal1 2056* | A theorem used in elimination of disjoint variable conditions on 𝑥, 𝑦 by replacing it with a distinctor ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑧. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewitten by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbexyz 2057* | Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. Identical to sbex 2058 except that it has an additional disjoint variable condition on 𝑦, 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbex 2058* | Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbalv 2059* | Quantify with new variable inside substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sbco4lem 2060* | Lemma for sbco4 2061. It replaces the temporary variable 𝑣 with another temporary variable 𝑤. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑣][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑤][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbco4 2061* | Two ways of exchanging two variables. Both sides of the biconditional exchange 𝑥 and 𝑦, either via two temporary variables 𝑢 and 𝑣, or a single temporary 𝑤. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑢][𝑥 / 𝑣][𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑤][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | exsb 2062* | An equivalent expression for existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2exsb 2063* | An equivalent expression for double existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimALT 2064* | Version of dvelim 2071 that doesn't use ax-10 1554. Because it has different distinct variable constraints than dvelim 2071 and is used in important proofs, it would be better if it had a name which does not end in ALT (ideally more close to set.mm naming). (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimfv 2065* | Like dvelimf 2069 but with a distinct variable constraint on 𝑥 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | hbsb4 2066 | A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | hbsb4t 2067 | A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 2066). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | nfsb4t 2068 | A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 2066). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimf 2069 | Version of dvelim 2071 without any variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimdf 2070 | Deduction form of dvelimf 2069. This version may be useful if we want to avoid ax-17 1575 and use ax-16 1863 instead. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | dvelim 2071* |
This theorem can be used to eliminate a distinct variable restriction on
𝑥 and 𝑧 and replace it with the
"distinctor" ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
as an antecedent. 𝜑 normally has 𝑧 free and can be read
𝜑(𝑧), and 𝜓 substitutes 𝑦 for
𝑧
and can be read
𝜑(𝑦). We don't require that 𝑥 and
𝑦
be distinct: if
they aren't, the distinctor will become false (in multiple-element
domains of discourse) and "protect" the consequent.
To obtain a closed-theorem form of this inference, prefix the hypotheses with ∀𝑥∀𝑧, conjoin them, and apply dvelimdf 2070. Other variants of this theorem are dvelimf 2069 (with no distinct variable restrictions) and dvelimALT 2064 (that avoids ax-10 1554). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimor 2072* | Disjunctive distinct variable constraint elimination. A user of this theorem starts with a formula 𝜑 (containing 𝑧) and a distinct variable constraint between 𝑥 and 𝑧. The theorem makes it possible to replace the distinct variable constraint with the disjunct ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 (𝜓 is just a version of 𝜑 with 𝑦 substituted for 𝑧). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | dveeq1 2073* | Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | sbal2 2074* | Move quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | nfsb4or 2075 | A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfd2 2076 | Deduce that 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓 in a context. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | hbe1a 2077 | Dual statement of hbe1 1544. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 15-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nf5-1 2078 | One direction of nf5 . (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nf5d 2079 | Deduce that 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓 in a context. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Syntax | weu 2080 | Extend wff definition to include existential uniqueness ("there exists a unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑"). |
| wff ∃!𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Syntax | wmo 2081 | Extend wff definition to include uniqueness ("there exists at most one 𝑥 such that 𝜑"). |
| wff ∃*𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | eujust 2082* | A soundness justification theorem for df-eu 2083, showing that the definition is equivalent to itself with its dummy variable renamed. Note that 𝑦 and 𝑧 needn't be distinct variables. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)) | ||
| Definition | df-eu 2083* | Define existential uniqueness, i.e., "there exists exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑". Definition 10.1 of [BellMachover] p. 97; also Definition *14.02 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 175. Other possible definitions are given by eu1 2105, eu2 2125, eu3 2127, and eu5 2128 (which in some cases we show with a hypothesis 𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑 in place of a distinct variable condition on 𝑦 and 𝜑). Double uniqueness is tricky: ∃!𝑥∃!𝑦𝜑 does not mean "exactly one 𝑥 and one 𝑦 " (see 2eu4 2174). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Definition | df-mo 2084 | Define "there exists at most one 𝑥 such that 𝜑". Here we define it in terms of existential uniqueness. Notation of [BellMachover] p. 460, whose definition we show as mo3 2135. For another possible definition see mo4 2142. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | euf 2085* | A version of the existential uniqueness definition with a hypothesis instead of a distinct variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | eubidh 2086 | Formula-building rule for unique existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | eubid 2087 | Formula-building rule for unique existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | eubidv 2088* | Formula-building rule for unique existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | eubii 2089 | Introduce unique existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | hbeu1 2090 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃!𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfeu1 2091 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | nfmo1 2092 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | sb8eu 2093 | Variable substitution in unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sb8mo 2094 | Variable substitution for "at most one". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfeudv 2095* | Deduction version of nfeu 2099. Similar to nfeud 2096 but has the additional constraint that 𝑥 and 𝑦 must be distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | nfeud 2096 | Deduction version of nfeu 2099. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | nfmod 2097 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | nfeuv 2098* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for existential uniqueness. This is similar to nfeu 2099 but has the additional condition that 𝑥 and 𝑦 must be distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | nfeu 2099 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for existential uniqueness. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 needn't be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | nfmo 2100 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |