P. 21 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2001-2100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sbcom2v 2001*	Lemma for proving sbcom2 2003. It is the same as sbcom2 2003 but with additional distinct variable constraints on 𝑥 and 𝑦, and on 𝑤 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑧]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcom2v2 2002*	Lemma for proving sbcom2 2003. It is the same as sbcom2v 2001 but removes the distinct variable constraint on 𝑥 and 𝑦. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑧]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcom2 2003*	Commutativity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.) (Proof modified to be intuitionistic by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑧]𝜑)
Theorem	sb6a 2004*	Equivalence for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	2sb5rf 2005*	Reversed double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	2sb6rf 2006*	Reversed double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	dfsb7 2007*	An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1774. By introducing a dummy variable 𝑧 in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝜑 of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because 𝑧 effectively insulates 𝑥 from 𝑦. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 1899, first 𝑧 for 𝑥 then 𝑦 for 𝑧. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17. Theorem sb7f 2008 provides a version where 𝜑 and 𝑧 don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sb7f 2008*	This version of dfsb7 2007 does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be disjoint. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 1537, i.e., that does not have the concept of a variable not occurring in a formula. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sb7af 2009*	An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1774. Similar to dfsb7a 2010 but does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. Similar to sb7f 2008 in that it involves a dummy variable 𝑧, but expressed in terms of ∀ rather than ∃. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	dfsb7a 2010*	An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1774. Similar to dfsb7 2007 in that it involves a dummy variable 𝑧, but expressed in terms of ∀ rather than ∃. For a version which only requires Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 rather than 𝑧 and 𝜑 being distinct, see sb7af 2009. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	sb10f 2011*	Hao Wang's identity axiom P6 in Irving Copi, Symbolic Logic (5th ed., 1979), p. 328. In traditional predicate calculus, this is a sole axiom for identity from which the usual ones can be derived. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	sbid2v 2012*	An identity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	sbelx 2013*	Elimination of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	sbel2x 2014*	Elimination of double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	sbalyz 2015*	Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution. Identical to sbal 2016 except that it has an additional distinct variable constraint on 𝑦 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbal 2016*	Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbal1yz 2017*	Lemma for proving sbal1 2018. Same as sbal1 2018 but with an additional disjoint variable condition on 𝑦, 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	sbal1 2018*	A theorem used in elimination of disjoint variable conditions on 𝑥, 𝑦 by replacing it with a distinctor ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑧. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewitten by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	sbexyz 2019*	Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. Identical to sbex 2020 except that it has an additional disjoint variable condition on 𝑦, 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbex 2020*	Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbalv 2021*	Quantify with new variable inside substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧𝜓)
Theorem	sbco4lem 2022*	Lemma for sbco4 2023. It replaces the temporary variable 𝑣 with another temporary variable 𝑤. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑣][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑤][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbco4 2023*	Two ways of exchanging two variables. Both sides of the biconditional exchange 𝑥 and 𝑦, either via two temporary variables 𝑢 and 𝑣, or a single temporary 𝑤. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑢][𝑥 / 𝑣][𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑤][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	exsb 2024*	An equivalent expression for existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	2exsb 2025*	An equivalent expression for double existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	dvelimALT 2026*	Version of dvelim 2033 that doesn't use ax-10 1516. Because it has different distinct variable constraints than dvelim 2033 and is used in important proofs, it would be better if it had a name which does not end in ALT (ideally more close to set.mm naming). (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	dvelimfv 2027*	Like dvelimf 2031 but with a distinct variable constraint on 𝑥 and 𝑧. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	hbsb4 2028	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	hbsb4t 2029	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 2028). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	nfsb4t 2030	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 2028). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	dvelimf 2031	Version of dvelim 2033 without any variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2002.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	dvelimdf 2032	Deduction form of dvelimf 2031. This version may be useful if we want to avoid ax-17 1537 and use ax-16 1825 instead. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	dvelim 2033*	This theorem can be used to eliminate a distinct variable restriction on 𝑥 and 𝑧 and replace it with the "distinctor" ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 as an antecedent. 𝜑 normally has 𝑧 free and can be read 𝜑(𝑧), and 𝜓 substitutes 𝑦 for 𝑧 and can be read 𝜑(𝑦). We don't require that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct: if they aren't, the distinctor will become false (in multiple-element domains of discourse) and "protect" the consequent. To obtain a closed-theorem form of this inference, prefix the hypotheses with ∀𝑥∀𝑧, conjoin them, and apply dvelimdf 2032. Other variants of this theorem are dvelimf 2031 (with no distinct variable restrictions) and dvelimALT 2026 (that avoids ax-10 1516). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	dvelimor 2034*	Disjunctive distinct variable constraint elimination. A user of this theorem starts with a formula 𝜑 (containing 𝑧) and a distinct variable constraint between 𝑥 and 𝑧. The theorem makes it possible to replace the distinct variable constraint with the disjunct ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 (𝜓 is just a version of 𝜑 with 𝑦 substituted for 𝑧). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	dveeq1 2035*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	sbal2 2036*	Move quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	nfsb4or 2037	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	nfd2 2038	Deduce that 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓 in a context. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	hbe1a 2039	Dual statement of hbe1 1506. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nf5-1 2040	One direction of nf5 . (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nf5d 2041	Deduce that 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓 in a context. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
1.4.6  Existential uniqueness
Syntax	weu 2042	Extend wff definition to include existential uniqueness ("there exists a unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑").
wff ∃!𝑥𝜑
Syntax	wmo 2043	Extend wff definition to include uniqueness ("there exists at most one 𝑥 such that 𝜑").
wff ∃*𝑥𝜑
Theorem	eujust 2044*	A soundness justification theorem for df-eu 2045, showing that the definition is equivalent to itself with its dummy variable renamed. Note that 𝑦 and 𝑧 needn't be distinct variables. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Definition	df-eu 2045*	Define existential uniqueness, i.e., "there exists exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑". Definition 10.1 of [BellMachover] p. 97; also Definition *14.02 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 175. Other possible definitions are given by eu1 2067, eu2 2086, eu3 2088, and eu5 2089 (which in some cases we show with a hypothesis 𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑 in place of a distinct variable condition on 𝑦 and 𝜑). Double uniqueness is tricky: ∃!𝑥∃!𝑦𝜑 does not mean "exactly one 𝑥 and one 𝑦 " (see 2eu4 2135). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Definition	df-mo 2046	Define "there exists at most one 𝑥 such that 𝜑". Here we define it in terms of existential uniqueness. Notation of [BellMachover] p. 460, whose definition we show as mo3 2096. For another possible definition see mo4 2103. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	euf 2047*	A version of the existential uniqueness definition with a hypothesis instead of a distinct variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	eubidh 2048	Formula-building rule for unique existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	eubid 2049	Formula-building rule for unique existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	eubidv 2050*	Formula-building rule for unique existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	eubii 2051	Introduce unique existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	hbeu1 2052	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nfeu1 2053	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑥𝜑
Theorem	nfmo1 2054	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑
Theorem	sb8eu 2055	Variable substitution in unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sb8mo 2056	Variable substitution for "at most one". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	nfeudv 2057*	Deduction version of nfeu 2061. Similar to nfeud 2058 but has the additional constraint that 𝑥 and 𝑦 must be distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfeud 2058	Deduction version of nfeu 2061. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfmod 2059	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfeuv 2060*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for existential uniqueness. This is similar to nfeu 2061 but has the additional condition that 𝑥 and 𝑦 must be distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜑
Theorem	nfeu 2061	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for existential uniqueness. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 needn't be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜑
Theorem	nfmo 2062	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑
Theorem	hbeu 2063	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for uniqueness. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 needn't be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃!𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	hbeud 2064	Deduction version of hbeu 2063. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑦𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃!𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	sb8euh 2065	Variable substitution in unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	cbveu 2066	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	eu1 2067*	An alternate way to express uniqueness used by some authors. Exercise 2(b) of [Margaris] p. 110. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	euor 2068	Introduce a disjunct into a unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜓) → ∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	euorv 2069*	Introduce a disjunct into a unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜓) → ∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	mo2n 2070*	There is at most one of something which does not exist. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	mon 2071	There is at most one of something which does not exist. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	euex 2072	Existential uniqueness implies existence. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eumo0 2073*	Existential uniqueness implies "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	eumo 2074	Existential uniqueness implies "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2018.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eumoi 2075	"At most one" inferred from existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1995.)
⊢ ∃!𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∃*𝑥𝜑
Theorem	mobidh 2076	Formula-building rule for "at most one" quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	mobid 2077	Formula-building rule for "at most one" quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	mobidv 2078*	Formula-building rule for "at most one" quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	mobii 2079	Formula-building rule for "at most one" quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝜒)
Theorem	hbmo1 2080	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	hbmo 2081	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	cbvmo 2082	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	mo23 2083*	An implication between two definitions of "there exists at most one." (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	mor 2084*	Converse of mo23 2083 with an additional ∃𝑥𝜑 condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	modc 2085*	Equivalent definitions of "there exists at most one," given decidable existence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	eu2 2086*	An alternate way of defining existential uniqueness. Definition 6.10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-1994.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	eu3h 2087*	An alternate way to express existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-1994.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	eu3 2088*	An alternate way to express existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-1994.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	eu5 2089	Uniqueness in terms of "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2018.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	exmoeu2 2090	Existence implies "at most one" is equivalent to uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	moabs 2091	Absorption of existence condition by "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	exmodc 2092	If existence is decidable, something exists or at most one exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃*𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	exmonim 2093	There is at most one of something which does not exist. Unlike exmodc 2092 there is no decidability condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	mo2r 2094*	A condition which implies "at most one". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	mo3h 2095*	Alternate definition of "at most one". Definition of [BellMachover] p. 460, except that definition has the side condition that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑 in place of our hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	mo3 2096*	Alternate definition of "at most one". Definition of [BellMachover] p. 460, except that definition has the side condition that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑 in place of our hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	mo2dc 2097*	Alternate definition of "at most one" where existence is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	euan 2098	Introduction of a conjunct into unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	euanv 2099*	Introduction of a conjunct into unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	euor2 2100	Introduce or eliminate a disjunct in a unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜓))