Theorem elabgf 2914

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
elabgf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
elabgf.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem elabgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfab1 2349	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3	1, 2	nfel 2356	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
4		elabgf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5	3, 4	nfbi 1611	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)
6		eleq1 2267	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
7		elabgf.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	6, 7	bibi12d 235	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)))
9		abid 2192	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
10	1, 5, 8, 9	vtoclgf 2830	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1372  Ⅎwnf 1482   ∈ wcel 2175  {cab 2190  Ⅎwnfc 2334

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-ext 2186

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1375  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-v 2773

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf  2915  elabg  2918  elab3gf  2922  elrabf  2926  bj-intabssel  15589