Theorem elabgf 2919

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
elabgf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
elabgf.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem elabgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfab1 2351	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3	1, 2	nfel 2358	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
4		elabgf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5	3, 4	nfbi 1613	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)
6		eleq1 2269	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
7		elabgf.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	6, 7	bibi12d 235	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)))
9		abid 2194	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
10	1, 5, 8, 9	vtoclgf 2833	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1373  Ⅎwnf 1484   ∈ wcel 2177  {cab 2192  Ⅎwnfc 2336

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-ext 2188

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-v 2775

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf  2920  elabg  2923  elab3gf  2927  elrabf  2931  bj-intabssel  15864