Theorem elabgf 2868

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
elabgf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
elabgf.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem elabgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfab1 2310	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3	1, 2	nfel 2317	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
4		elabgf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5	3, 4	nfbi 1577	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)
6		eleq1 2229	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
7		elabgf.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	6, 7	bibi12d 234	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)))
9		abid 2153	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
10	1, 5, 8, 9	vtoclgf 2784	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1343  Ⅎwnf 1448   ∈ wcel 2136  {cab 2151  Ⅎwnfc 2295

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-v 2728

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf  2869  elabg  2872  elab3gf  2876  elrabf  2880  bj-intabssel  13670