Theorem nalset 4263

Description: No set contains all sets. Theorem 41 of [Suppes] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nalset	⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem nalset

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		alexnim 1701	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
2		ax-sep 4249	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧))
3		elequ1 2213	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))
4		elequ1 2213	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
5		elequ1 2213	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))
6		elequ2 2214	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))
7	5, 6	bitrd 188	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))
8	7	notbid 677	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))
9	4, 8	anbi12d 477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)))
10	3, 9	bibi12d 235	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))))
11	10	spv 1913	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)))
12		pclem6 1423	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)) → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
13	11, 12	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧)) → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
14	2, 13	eximii 1655	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
15	1, 14	mpg 1504	1 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1400  ∃wex 1545

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-5 1500  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-13 2211  ax-14 2212  ax-sep 4249

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514

This theorem is used by:  vnex  4264